Assessing evolutionary consequences of size-selective recreational fishing on multiple life-history traits, with an application to northern pike (Esox lucius)

Despite mounting recognition of the importance of fishing-induced evolution, methods for quantifying selection pressures on multiple adaptive traits affected by size-selective harvesting are still scarce. We study selection differentials on three life-history traits—reproductive investment, size at maturation, and growth capacity—under size-selective exploitation of northern pike (Esox lucius L.) with recreational-fishing gear. An age-structured population model is presented that accounts for the eco-evolutionary feedback arising from density-dependent and frequency-dependent selection. By introducing minimum-length limits, maximum-length limits, and combinations of such limits (resulting in harvestable-slot length limits) into the model, we examine the potential of simple management tools for mitigating selection pressures induced by recreational fishing. With regard to annual reproductive investment, we find that size-selective fishing mortality exerts relatively small positive selection differentials. By contrast, selection differentials on size at maturation are large and consistently negative. Selection differentials on growth capacity are often large and positive, but become negative when a certain range of minimum-length limits are applied. In general, the strength of selection is reduced by implementing more stringent management policies, but each life-history trait responds differently to the introduction of specific harvest regulations. Based on a simple genetic inheritance model, we examine mid- and long-term evolutionary changes of the three life-history traits and their impacts on the size spectrum and yield of pike. Fishing-induced evolution often reduces sizes and yields, but details depend on a variety of factors such as the specific regulation in place. We find no regulation that is successful in reducing to zero all selection pressures on life-history traits induced by recreational fishing. Accordingly, we must expect that inducing some degree of evolution through recreational fishing is inevitable.

[1]  M. Heino,et al.  Toward Darwinian fisheries management , 2009, Evolutionary applications.

[2]  D. P. Swain,et al.  Evolutionary response to size-selective mortality in an exploited fish population , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  K. Brander,et al.  Expected rate of fisheries-induced evolution is slow , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  VISUALIZING MULTIVARIATE SELECTION , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  Ø. Fiksen,et al.  Size-selective fishing gear and life history evolution in the Northeast Arctic cod , 2009, Evolutionary applications.

[6]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Implications of fisheries-induced evolution for stock rebuilding and recovery , 2009, Evolutionary applications.

[7]  R. Law,et al.  Evolution of yields from populations with age-specific cropping , 1989, Evolutionary Ecology.

[8]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Propensity of marine reserves to reduce the evolutionary effects of fishing in a migratory species , 2009, Evolutionary applications.

[9]  P. Abrams,et al.  Interpreting the von Bertalanffy model of somatic growth in fishes: the cost of reproduction , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  A. Hendry,et al.  Life history change in commercially exploited fish stocks: an analysis of trends across studies , 2009, Evolutionary applications.

[11]  M. Heino,et al.  Fisheries-Induced Selection Pressures in the Context of Sustainable Fisheries , 2002 .

[12]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  The dawn of Darwinian fishery management , 2009 .

[13]  Kevin Stokes,et al.  The Exploitation of Evolving Resources , 1993 .

[14]  P. Convey,et al.  Life history traits , 2006 .

[15]  T. Thompson.  The behavioral perspective. , 1978, The Hastings Center report.

[16]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  The conservation and fishery benefits of protecting large pike Esox lucius L. by harvest regulations in recreational fishing , 2010 .

[17]  R. Arlinghaus,et al.  Documented and Potential Biological Impacts of Recreational Fishing: Insights for Management and Conservation , 2006 .

[18]  Jonathan Dushoff,et al.  MARINE RESERVE DESIGN AND THE EVOLUTION OF SIZE AT MATURATION IN HARVESTED FISH , 2005 .

[19]  Ian J. Winfield,et al.  Harvest-induced disruptive selection increases variance in fitness-related traits , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Christopher C. Wilmers,et al.  Human predators outpace other agents of trait change in the wild , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  J. Merilä,et al.  Detecting and managing fisheries-induced evolution. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  Joe Hereford,et al.  COMPARING STRENGTHS OF DIRECTIONAL SELECTION: HOW STRONG IS STRONG? , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  A. Raat.  Synopsis of biological data on the Northern pike, Esox lucius Linnaeus, 1758 , 1989 .

[24]  P. Holgate,et al.  Matrix Population Models. , 1990 .

[25]  R. Arlinghaus,et al.  Reconciling traditional inland fisheries management and sustainability in industrialized countries, with emphasis on Europe , 2002 .

[26]  R. Arlinghaus,et al.  Life-history traits and energetic status in relation to vulnerability to angling in an experimentally selected teleost fish , 2009, Evolutionary applications.

[27]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Detecting Fisheries-Induced Life-History Evolution: An Overview of the Reaction-Norm Approach , 2008 .

[28]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1962 .

[29]  C. Kipling.  Changes in the population of pike (Esox lucius) in Windermere from 1944 to 1981 , 1983 .

[30]  Stephan B. Munch,et al.  Sustaining Fisheries Yields Over Evolutionary Time Scales , 2002, Science.

[31]  W. E. Ricker,et al.  Changes in the Average Size and Average Age of Pacific Salmon , 1981 .

[32]  Julie E. Claussen,et al.  Selection for Vulnerability to Angling in Largemouth Bass , 2009 .

[33]  J. Diana.  Growth, Maturation, and Production of Northern Pike in Three Michigan Lakes , 1983 .

[34]  J. B. James,et al.  Trait changes in a harvested population are driven by a dynamic tug-of-war between natural and harvest selection , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  David W. Willis,et al.  Proposed Standard Length–Weight Equation for Northern Pike , 1989 .

[36]  R. G. Randall,et al.  A model simulating the impact of habitat supply limits on northern pike, Essox lucius, in Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario , 1996 .

[37]  R. Arlinghaus,et al.  Size Selectivity, Injury, Handling Time, and Determinants of Initial Hooking Mortality in Recreational Angling for Northern Pike: The Influence of Type and Size of Bait , 2008 .

[38]  P. Mace,et al.  Relationships between Common Biological Reference Points Used as Thresholds and Targets of Fisheries Management Strategies , 1994 .

[39]  J. B. James,et al.  Antagonistic selection from predators and pathogens alters food-web structure , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  C. Wedekind,et al.  Fishery-induced selection on an Alpine whitefish: quantifying genetic and environmental effects on individual growth rate , 2008, Evolutionary applications.

[41]  C. Kipling,et al.  A Study of the Mortality, Population Numbers, Year Class Strengths, Production and Food Consumption of Pike, Esox lucius L., in Windermere from 1944 to 1962 , 1970 .

[42]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Managing Evolving Fish Stocks , 2007 .

[43]  Mikko Heino,et al.  Management of evolving fish stocks , 1998 .

[44]  C. Kipling.  Changes in the Growth of Pike (Esox lucius) in Windermere , 1983 .

[45]  Maurice I. Muoneke,et al.  Hooking mortality: A review for recreational fisheries , 1994 .

[46]  R. Pierce,et al.  Exploitation of Northern Pike in Seven Small North‐Central Minnesota Lakes , 1995 .

[47]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Mitigating fisheries-induced evolution in lacustrine brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis) in southern Quebec, Canada , 2009, Evolutionary applications.

[48]  C. Quince,et al.  Biphasic growth in fish I: theoretical foundations. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[49]  C. Paukert,et al.  An Overview of Northern Pike Regulations in North America , 2001 .

[50]  J. B. James,et al.  Four decades of opposing natural and human-induced artificial selection acting on Windermere pike (Esox lucius). , 2007, Ecology letters.

[51]  D. Fraser,et al.  The nature of fisheries‐ and farming‐induced evolution , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[52]  M. Kinnison,et al.  Some cautionary notes on fisheries evolutionary impact assessments , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  S. Brotherstone,et al.  Predictions of response to selection caused by angling in a wild population of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) , 2010 .

[54]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Probabilistic maturation reaction norms: their history, strengths, and limitations , 2007 .

[55]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Eco-genetic modeling of contemporary life-history evolution. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[56]  Richard Law,et al.  Fisheries-induced evolution: present status and future directions , 2007 .

[57]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Ecology: Managing Evolving Fish Stocks , 2007, Science.

[58]  J. Post,et al.  Assessment of Alternative Harvest Regulations for Sustaining Recreational Fisheries: Model Development and Application to Bull Trout , 2003 .

[59]  L. Smith,et al.  Early Life History of the Northern Pike, Esox lucius L., with Special Reference to the Factors Influencing the Numerical Strength of Year Classes , 1963 .

[60]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Quantifying selection differentials caused by recreational fishing: development of modeling framework and application to reproductive investment in pike (Esox lucius) , 2009, Evolutionary applications.

[61]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Adaptive changes in harvested populations: plasticity and evolution of age and size at maturation , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[62]  K. Lorenzen,et al.  Density-dependent growth as a key mechanism in the regulation of fish populations: evidence from among-population comparisons , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[63]  R. Frankham.  Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th edn): by Douglas S. Falconer and Trudy F.C. Mackay Longman, 1996. £24.99 pbk (xv and 464 pages) ISBN 0582 24302 5 , 1996 .

[64]  C. Kipling,et al.  Reproduction effort versus the environment; case histories of Windermere perch, Perca fluviatilis L., and pike, Esox lucius L. , 1983 .

[65]  J. B. James,et al.  DENSITY DEPENDENCE AND DENSITY INDEPENDENCE IN THE DEMOGRAPHY AND DISPERSAL OF PIKE OVER FOUR DECADES , 2007 .

[66]  U. H. Thygesen,et al.  How optimal life history changes with the community size-spectrum , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[67]  R. Arlinghaus,et al.  A behavioral perspective on fishing-induced evolution. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[68]  J. Stamps,et al.  Growth-mortality tradeoffs and 'personality traits' in animals. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[69]  Evolutionarily Stable Optimal Harvesting Strategies , 1993 .

[70]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Fisheries-Induced Changes in Growth Rates in Marine Fisheries: Are they Significant? , 2008 .

[71]  Steven J. D. Martell,et al.  Fisheries Ecology and Management , 2004 .

[72]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  The impact of fishing-induced mortality on the evolution of alternative life-history tactics in brook charr , 2008, Evolutionary applications.