Seismic performance assessment of “hybrid” structures using two-level multy group GIS oriented approach: case studies

In this paper, a two-level multi-group approach to seismic performance assessment of existing building stock is presented and discussed. The first level of assessment is a simple visual screening based on the principles originally developed in FEMA (Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazards: a handbook—FEMA 154 and 155, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, 2002). The second level of assessment is based on an integrated approach (field survey, geotechnical investigations, experimental testing and analytical investigations) with incorporated procedures of different levels of complexity. The acceptance criteria for assessment are founded on demand versus capacity relationships, defined at element and story level. The developed approach was applied in performance assessment of the existing buildings in Karposh, which is one of the largest and oldest municipalities in Skopje, the capital of the Republic of Macedonia. Rapid visual screening (level_1 activity) was performed for 161 existing buildings. For two selected buildings, level_2 assessment was carried out. The results from the assessment were uploaded into the existing geo-referenced building inventory database on the Karposh municipality that represents a practical tool for the decision makers in enforcing decisions on design and construction of seismically resilient building environment.

[1]  Andreas J. Kappos,et al.  A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings , 2006 .

[2]  Andreas J. Kappos,et al.  Earthquake-resistant concrete structures , 1996 .

[3]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  THE N2 METHOD FOR THE SEISMIC DAMAGE ANALYSIS OF RC BUILDINGS , 1996 .

[4]  Predrag Gavrilovic,et al.  Integrated Approach to Repair and Seismic Strengthening of Mustafa Pasha Mosque in Skopje , 2008 .

[5]  Paolo Franchin,et al.  Existing Buildings: The New Italian Provisions for Probabilistic Seismic Assessment , 2014 .

[6]  A. Yakut,et al.  SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING BUILDING STOCK IN ISTANBUL A PILOT APPLICATION IN ZEYTINBURNU DISTRICT , 2005 .

[7]  T. Paulay,et al.  Reinforced Concrete Structures , 1975 .

[8]  M. Fardis,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1998-1 and en 1998-5 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance; general rules, seismic actions, design rules for buildings, foundations and retaining structures/ M.Fardis[et al.] , 2005 .

[9]  Atilla Ansal,et al.  Seismic microzonation and earthquake damage scenarios for urban areas , 2010 .

[10]  Mehul Shah,et al.  A Proposed Rapid Visual Screening Procedure for Seismic Evaluation of RC-Frame Buildings in India , 2010 .

[11]  P. Fajfar,et al.  Assessment of the seismic performance of low-rise RC structures by procedures with different levels of complexity , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[12]  Miha Tomazevic,et al.  Earthquake-Resistant Design of Masonry Buildings , 1999 .

[13]  Y. J. Park,et al.  IDARC: Inelastic Damage Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frame - Shear-Wall Structures , 1987 .

[14]  Alper Ilki,et al.  Rapid Seismic Assessment Procedures for the Turkish Building Stock , 2014 .

[15]  Graham H. Powell,et al.  Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures , 2008 .

[16]  Veronika Shendova,et al.  Implementation of Experimentally Developed Methodology for Seismic Strengthening and Repair of Historic Monuments , 2014 .

[17]  Roberta Apostolska,et al.  Consolidation, rebuilding and strengthening of St. Clement’s church, St. Panteleymon, Plaoshnik, Ohrid , 2008 .

[18]  Ahmet Yakut,et al.  A Screening Procedure for Seismic Risk Assessment in Urban Building Stocks , 2007 .

[19]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  Seismic Evaluation of Existing Reinforced Concrete Building Columns , 1996 .