Seeking Common Ground in the Diversity and Diffusion of Action Research and Collaborative Management Research Action Modalities: Toward a General Empirical Method

As the field of action-oriented research becomes increasingly diffuse and diverse, this paper seeks to identify common ground across the multiple modalities of action research and collaborative management research through articulating and exploring a general empirical method that is grounded in the recognizable structure of human knowing. This method is grounded in: attention to observable data (experience), envisaging possible explanations of that data (understanding), and preferring as probable or certain the explanations, which provide the best account for the data (judgment). Engaging this method requires the dispositions to perform the operations of attentiveness, intelligence, and reasonableness, to which responsibility is added when we seek to take action. This paper seeks to provide insight into the multiple modalities of action research and collaborative management research and to illustrate how each modality engages the recognizable operations of human knowing.

[1]  E. Schein.  Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[2]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[3]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Reasons and Rationalizations , 2004 .

[4]  P. Reason.  Choice and Quality in Action Research Practice , 2006 .

[5]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  Handbook of Collaborative Management Research , 2008 .

[6]  Hilary Bradbury,et al.  Learning History and Organizational Praxis , 2001 .

[7]  Morten Levin.  Action research and the research community , 2003 .

[8]  Edgar H. Schein,et al.  Clinical Inquiry/Research , 2008 .

[9]  Judi Marshall,et al.  Quality in research as “taking an attitude of inquiry” , 2007 .

[10]  R. Marshak,et al.  Revisioning Organization Development , 2009 .

[11]  K. Gergen.  Toward Generative Theory , 1978 .

[12]  Karen E. Watkins,et al.  The emerging power of action inquiry technologies , 1994 .

[13]  R. W. Revans,et al.  Developing Effective Managers , 1971 .

[14]  D. Coghlan.  Authenticity as first person practice , 2008 .

[15]  Roderick E. White,et al.  An Organizational Learning Framework : From Intuition to Institution Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[16]  James D. Ludema,et al.  19 The Practice of Appreciative Inquiry , 2008 .

[17]  Paul Coughlan,et al.  Reconciling market requirements and operations resources: an opportunity for action learning , 2009 .

[18]  J. Reed.  Appreciative Inquiry: Research for Change , 2006 .

[19]  Albert David,et al.  Collaborative Research: Alternative Roadmaps , 2004 .

[20]  Victoria J. Marsick,et al.  Understanding Action Learning , 2007 .

[21]  Victor J. Friedman,et al.  17 Action Science: Linking Causal Theory and Meaning Making in Action Research , 2008 .

[22]  P. Docherty,et al.  Organizational development for social sustainability in work systems , 2009 .

[23]  Edgar H. Schein,et al.  Process consultation, action research, and clinical inquiry : are they the same? , 1995 .

[24]  P. Reason.  Co-operative inquiry as a discipline of professional practice , 1998 .

[25]  Participatory Action Research: Principles, Politics, and Possibilities. , 1994 .

[26]  J. Raelin.  Seeking conceptual clarity in the action modalities , 2009 .

[27]  E. Schein.  Process consultation revisited : building the helping relationship , 1999 .

[28]  Donald A. Schön.  Knowing-In-Action: The New Scholarship Requires a New Epistemology , 1995 .

[29]  Judi Marshall,et al.  Living Life as Inquiry , 1999 .

[30]  David Coghlan,et al.  Toward a Philosophy of Clinical Inquiry/Research , 2009 .

[31]  David Braine.  Redirecting Philosophy: Reflections on the Nature of Knowledge from Plato to Lonergan , 2000 .

[32]  J. Dewey,et al.  How We Think , 2009 .

[33]  Paul Coughlan,et al.  Collaborative Research in and by an Interorganizational Network , 2008 .

[34]  W. Torbert,et al.  The Action Turn: toward a transformational social science , 2001 .

[35]  H. Bradbury,et al.  23 Learning History: An Action Research Practice in Support of Actionable Learning , 2008 .

[36]  D. Ladkin.  ‘The enigma of subjectivity’ , 2005 .

[37]  R. W. Revans,et al.  ABC of Action Learning , 1998 .