Models and people: An alternative view of the emergent properties of computational models

Computer models can help humans gain insight into the functioning of complex systems. Used for training, they can also help gain insight into the cognitive processes humans use to understand these systems. By influencing humans understanding (and consequent actions) computer models can thus generate an impact on both these actors and the very systems they are designed to simulate. When these systems also include humans, a number of self-referential relations thus emerge which can lead to very complex dynamics. This is particularly true when we explicitly acknowledge and model the existence of multiple conflicting representations of reality among different individuals. Given the increasing availability of computational devices, the use of computer models to support individual and shared decision making could potentially have implications far wider than the ones often discussed within the Information and Communication Technologies community in terms of computational power and network communication. We discuss some theoretical implications and describe some initial numerical simulations. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Complexity, 2015

[1]  Kiel Moe Science in the Age of Computer Simulation , 2015 .

[2]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[3]  David C. Smith,et al.  Human behaviour: the key source of uncertainty in fisheries management , 2011 .

[4]  Wendy S. Parker,et al.  Does matter really matter? Computer simulations, experiments, and materiality , 2009, Synthese.

[5]  K. Beven Towards a coherent philosophy for modelling the environment , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[6]  A. K. Saysel,et al.  Misperceptions of global climate change: information policies , 2009 .

[7]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  Fabio Boschetti,et al.  How Computational Models Predict the Behavior of Complex Systems , 2012, Foundations of Science.

[9]  M. Bedau Weak Emergence * , 1997 .

[10]  Eric Winsberg,et al.  Science in the Age of Computer Simulation , 2010 .

[11]  I. Walker,et al.  Social Cognition: An Integrated Introduction , 1996 .

[12]  J. Jost,et al.  Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  C. Shalizi,et al.  Causal architecture, complexity and self-organization in time series and cellular automata , 2001 .

[14]  Dan M. Kahan,et al.  Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection , 2013, Judgment and Decision Making.

[15]  Fabio Boschetti Causality, emergence, computation and unreasonable expectations , 2011, Synth..

[16]  Young,et al.  Inferring statistical complexity. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[17]  Rachel E. Goldsmith,et al.  System Justification, the Denial of Global Warming, and the Possibility of “System-Sanctioned Change” , 2010, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[18]  R. Bond,et al.  Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. , 1996 .

[19]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Toward a Relational Concept of Uncertainty: about Knowing Too Little, Knowing Too Differently, and Accepting Not to Know , 2008 .

[20]  Fabio Boschetti,et al.  Complexity of a modelling exercise: A discussion of the role of computer simulation in complex system science , 2008 .

[21]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Thinking about systems: student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems , 2007 .

[22]  Erling Moxnes OVEREXPLOITATION OF RENEWABLE RESOURCES : THE ROLE OF MISPERCEPTIONS , 1998 .

[23]  Joshua M. Epstein Agent-based computational models and generative social science , 1999 .

[24]  Beatriz A. Roel,et al.  Management procedures in a fishery based on highly variable stocks and with conflicting objectives: experiences in the South African pelagic fishery , 1998, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[25]  J. Crutchfield The calculi of emergence: computation, dynamics and induction , 1994 .

[26]  Paul Humphreys,et al.  Extending Ourselves: Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method , 2004 .

[27]  Cleotilde González,et al.  Why don ’ t well-educated adults understand accumulation ? A challenge to researchers , educators , and citizens , 2008 .

[28]  J. M. Olson,et al.  Uncertainty orientation and persuasion: Individual differences in the effects of personal relevance on social judgments. , 1988 .

[29]  Fabio Boschetti,et al.  Modelling = conditional prediction , 2011 .

[30]  J. Sterman,et al.  Cloudy Skies: Assessing Public Understanding of Global Warming , 2002 .

[31]  Stuart J. Russell,et al.  Rationality and Intelligence: A Brief Update , 2013, PT-AI.

[32]  David J. Kusterer,et al.  Behavioral Biases and Cognitive Reflection , 2009 .

[33]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Individual differences in rational thought. , 1998 .

[34]  M. V. D. Belt,et al.  Mediated Modeling: A System Dynamics Approach To Environmental Consensus Building , 2004 .

[35]  D. Kahneman Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[36]  Anjan Chakravartty,et al.  A puzzle about voluntarism about rational epistemic stances , 2009, Synthese.

[37]  Fabio Boschetti,et al.  Attitudes, Ideologies and Self-Organization: Information Load Minimization in Multi-Agent Decision Making , 2013, Adv. Complex Syst..

[38]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[39]  Peter Baumann,et al.  Empiricism, stances, and the problem of voluntarism , 2009, Synthese.

[40]  Fabio Boschetti,et al.  A computational model of a mental model used to reason about climate change , 2012 .

[41]  Fabio Boschetti,et al.  A graphical representation of uncertainty in complex decision making , 2011 .

[42]  F. Boschetti,et al.  Assessing attitudes and cognitive styles of stakeholders in environmental projects involving computer modelling , 2012 .

[43]  Keith Beven,et al.  A manifesto for the equifinality thesis , 2006 .

[44]  Darrell P. Rowbottom,et al.  Stance and rationality: a perspective , 2009, Synthese.

[45]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  Lay Epistemics and Human Knowledge: Cognitive and Motivational Bases , 2013 .

[46]  Colin Camerer,et al.  The process-performance paradox in expert judgment - How can experts know so much and predict so badly? , 1991 .

[47]  Ronald D. Brunner Predictions and policy decisions , 1999 .

[48]  Louis Moresi,et al.  Comparison between interactive (subjective) and traditional (numerical) inversion by genetic algorithms , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC00 (Cat. No.00TH8512).

[49]  Donald A. Sch The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[50]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Agent-based computational models and generative social science , 1999, Complex..

[51]  C. I. Hovland The Order Of Presentation In Persuasion , 1966 .

[52]  William Ascher The ambiguous nature of forecasts in project evaluation: Diagnosing the over-optimism of rate-of-return analysis , 1993 .

[53]  Nicolas Brodu,et al.  A synthesis and a practical approach to complex systems , 2006, Complex..

[54]  Liangxiao Jiang,et al.  Beyond accuracy: Learning selective Bayesian classifiers with minimal test cost , 2016, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[55]  N. Bunnefeld,et al.  Management strategy evaluation: a powerful tool for conservation? , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[56]  Roman Frigg,et al.  The philosophy of simulation: hot new issues or same old stew? , 2009, Synthese.

[57]  Miriana Sporcic,et al.  A multi-model approach to stakeholder engagement in complex environmental problems , 2011 .

[58]  K. Andrew West Mediated Modeling: A Systems Approach to Environmental Consensus Building , 2006 .

[59]  James Ladyman,et al.  The scientistic stance: the empirical and materialist stances reconciled , 2009, Synthese.

[60]  Fabio Boschetti,et al.  A Turing Test for Emergence , 2008, Advances in Applied Self-organizing Systems.

[61]  Erling Moxnes,et al.  Not only the tragedy of the commons: misperceptions of feedback and policies for sustainable development , 2000 .

[62]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  How many singularities are near and how will they disrupt human history , 2011 .

[63]  Dietrich Dörner,et al.  The Logic Of Failure: Recognizing And Avoiding Error In Complex Situations , 1997 .

[64]  J. Bain,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article How Many Variables Can Humans Process? , 2022 .

[65]  Timothy Bates,et al.  Minority Business Access to Mainstream Markets , 2001 .

[66]  J. Goldstein The Singular Nature of Emergent Levels: Suggestions for a Theory of Emergence , 2002 .

[67]  Marcela Brugnach From prediction to learning: the implications of changing the purpose of the modelling activity , 2010 .

[68]  Fabio Boschetti,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Stakeholder Engagement in Management Strategy Evaluation , 2013 .

[69]  Bas C. van Fraassen On stance and rationality , 2009, Synthese.

[70]  Claire Wagner,et al.  The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: testing a dual process model. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[71]  A. Tenbrunsel,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2013 .

[72]  John T. Jost,et al.  Political ideology as motivated social cognition: Behavioral and neuroscientific evidence , 2012 .

[73]  James S. Chisholm,et al.  The frames behind the games: Player's perceptions of prisoners dilemma, chicken, dictator, and ultimatum games , 2011 .

[74]  P. Aligica Prediction, Explanation and the Epistemology of Future Studies , 2003 .

[75]  A. Morelli Inverse Problem Theory , 2010 .

[76]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". , 1996, Psychological review.

[77]  Mikhail Prokopenko,et al.  An information-theoretic primer on complexity, self-organization, and emergence , 2009 .

[78]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Memory for Fact, Fiction, and Misinformation , 2005, Psychological science.

[79]  C. Adami What is complexity? , 2002, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[80]  Fabio Boschetti,et al.  Emergence and computability , 2007 .

[81]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Globally networked risks and how to respond , 2013, Nature.

[82]  Roger Bradbury,et al.  What is a model, why people don't trust them, and why they should , 2012 .

[83]  J. Sterman,et al.  Understanding public complacency about climate change: adults’ mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter , 2007 .

[84]  Cosma Rohilla Shalizi,et al.  Blind Construction of Optimal Nonlinear Recursive Predictors for Discrete Sequences , 2004, UAI.

[85]  Matthias Steup,et al.  Empiricism, metaphysics, and voluntarism , 2009, Synthese.

[86]  Joseph Arvai,et al.  When Less is More: How Affect Influences Preferences When Comparing Low and High‐risk Options , 2006 .

[87]  Timothy O'Riordan,et al.  Institutions, climate change and cultural theory: towards a common analytical framework , 1999 .

[88]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[89]  Elizabeth A. Fulton,et al.  Interactive modelling for natural resource management , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[90]  F. Boschetti,et al.  Interactive inversion in geosciences , 2001 .

[91]  Aaron Wildavsky,et al.  Choosing Preferences by Constructing Institutions: A Cultural Theory of Preference Formation , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[92]  Naomi Oreskes Why Believe a Computer? Models, Measures, and Meaning in the Natural World , 2018 .

[93]  Corinna Elsenbroich,et al.  Explanation in Agent-Based Modelling: Functions, Causality or Mechanisms? , 2012, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[94]  Ian Lowe,et al.  Science to inform and models to engage , 2013 .

[95]  Robert Haslinger,et al.  Quantifying self-organization with optimal predictors. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[96]  P. Slovic The Construction of Preference , 1995 .

[97]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Bathtub dynamics: initial results of a systems thinking inventory , 2000 .

[98]  R. Parker Understanding Inverse Theory , 1977 .

[99]  James P. Crutchfield,et al.  Computational Mechanics: Pattern and Prediction, Structure and Simplicity , 1999, ArXiv.

[100]  Karl Dake Myths of Nature: Culture and the Social Construction of Risk , 1992 .

[101]  Keith Beven,et al.  Towards a coherent philosophy for environmental modelling. , 2002 .

[102]  Y. Olesha Dynamics of Growth in a Finite World , 1974 .

[103]  André E. Punt,et al.  Design of operational management strategies for achieving fishery ecosystem objectives , 2000 .

[104]  D. Sornette,et al.  Finite-time singularity in the dynamics of the world population, economic and financial indices , 2000, cond-mat/0002075.

[105]  D. Perkins,et al.  Intelligence in the Wild: A Dispositional View of Intellectual Traits , 2000 .

[106]  J. Sterman Risk Communication on Climate: Mental Models and Mass Balance , 2008, Science.

[107]  Joel Cooper,et al.  Cognitive Dissonance: Fifty Years of a Classic Theory , 2007 .

[108]  Amnon H. Eden,et al.  Singularity Hypotheses: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment , 2013 .

[109]  Fabio Boschetti,et al.  Complexity of a modelling exercise: A discussion of the role of computer simulation in complex system science , 2008, Complex..

[110]  Fabio Boschetti,et al.  Can we learn how complex systems work , 2011 .

[111]  Gordon B. Moskowitz,et al.  Individual differences in social categorization: The influence of personal need for structure on spontaneous trait inferences. , 1993 .

[112]  S. Frederick Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[113]  Fabio Boschetti,et al.  Novel Properties Generated by Interacting Computational Systems , 2011, Complex Syst..