Directional adhesion of superhydrophobic butterfly wings.

We showed directional adhesion on the superhydrophobic wings of the butterfly . A droplet easily rolls off the surface of the wings along the radial outward (RO) direction of the central axis of the body, but is pinned tightly against the RO direction. Interestingly, these two distinct states can be tuned by controlling the posture of the wings (downward or upward) and the direction of airflow across the surface (along or against the RO direction), respectively. Research indicated that these special abilities resulted from the direction-dependent arrangement of nano-tips on ridging nano-stripes and micro-scales overlapped on the wings at the level, where two distinct contact modes of a droplet with orientation-tuneable microstructures occur and thus produce different adhesive forces. We believe that this finding will help the design of smart, fluid-controllable interfaces that may be applied in novel microfluidic devices and directional, easy-cleaning coatings.

[1]  Jin Zhai,et al.  Superhydrophobic Aligned Polystyrene Nanotube Films with High Adhesive Force , 2005 .

[2]  Yang Cheng,et al.  Is the lotus leaf superhydrophobic , 2005 .

[3]  Neelesh A Patankar,et al.  Anisotropy in the wetting of rough surfaces. , 2005, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[4]  Neelesh A. Patankar,et al.  On the Modeling of Hydrophobic Contact Angles on Rough Surfaces , 2003 .

[5]  Lei Jiang,et al.  Bioinspired surfaces with special wettability. , 2005, Accounts of chemical research.

[6]  H. Fuchs,et al.  Anisotropic contact-angle hysteresis of chemically nanostructured surfaces. , 2001, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[7]  Reinhard Lipowsky,et al.  Wetting morphologies at microstructured surfaces. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Neelesh A Patankar,et al.  Transition between superhydrophobic states on rough surfaces. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[9]  Jin Zhai,et al.  Super-hydrophobic surfaces: From natural to artificial , 2002 .

[10]  Wilhelm Barthlott,et al.  Wettability and Contaminability of Insect Wings as a Function of Their Surface Sculptures , 1996 .

[11]  R. N. Wenzel RESISTANCE OF SOLID SURFACES TO WETTING BY WATER , 1936 .

[12]  David Quéré,et al.  Slippy and sticky microtextured solids , 2003 .

[13]  Wei Chen,et al.  Ultrahydrophobic and Ultralyophobic Surfaces: Some Comments and Examples , 1999 .

[14]  Tomohiro Onda,et al.  Super-Water-Repellent Fractal Surfaces , 1995 .

[15]  G. Whitesides The 'right' size in nanobiotechnology , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  A. Cassie,et al.  Wettability of porous surfaces , 1944 .

[17]  C. Extrand,et al.  Criteria for ultralyophobic surfaces. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[18]  Abraham Marmur,et al.  The Lotus effect: superhydrophobicity and metastability. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[19]  Ivan P. Parkin,et al.  Self-cleaning coatings , 2005 .

[20]  Neelesh A. Patankar,et al.  Multiple Equilibrium Droplet Shapes and Design Criterion for Rough Hydrophobic Surfaces , 2003 .

[21]  Kazuhito Hashimoto,et al.  Effects of Surface Structure on the Hydrophobicity and Sliding Behavior of Water Droplets , 2002 .