The Effects of Disinfectants on Dimensional Accuracy and Surface Quality of Impression Materials and Gypsum Casts

Background The study aimed to evaluating the effect of disinfecting impression materials on the dimensional accuracy and surface quality of the resulting casts. Methods Impressions of a steel die constructed according to ANSI/ADA specification No.18 were made with each of alginate, addition cured silicone, condensation cured silicone and zinc oxide eugenol paste, and disinfected consequently by each of 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate, 1% sodium hypochlorite, 2% gluteraldehyde for 5 minutes, and 0.5% sodium hypochlorite for 10 minutes. Dimensions of the disinfected impressions and their resultant casts were measured using a computerized digital caliper, and the dimensional changes were calculated. Reproduction of detail and surface quality of the resultant casts were assessed by grading casts surfaces according to a specific scoring system. Results The 0.5% sodium hypochlorite was found to produce the least dimensional changes in all the impression materials. Corsodyl produced the maximum changes in both alginate and zinc-oxide eugenol while addition-cured silicon was most affected by Gluteraldehyde and condensation-cured silicon was most affected by Hexana. The dimensional changes, however, were minimal and clinically insignificant. Addition-cured silicon showed the best surface quality and dimensional stability followed by condensation-cured silicon. Alginate and zinc-oxide eugenol had poorer surface quality and were affected to a higher extent by the disinfection procedures. Conclusions The results were comparable with the standard specifications for dimensional stability. Recommendations were made for the use of 10 minutes immersion in 0.5% sodium hypochlorite as the most appropriate disinfection protocol to the investigated impression materials. Keywords Disinfectants; Gypsum casts; Impressions; Alginate; Addition-cured silicone; Sodium hypochlorite

[1]  D. Wood,et al.  The effect of disinfecting alginate and addition cured silicone rubber impression materials on the physical properties of impressions and resultant casts. , 1998, The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry.

[2]  P. Wright,et al.  Disinfection procedures: their effect on the dimensional accuracy and surface quality of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials and gypsum casts. , 2002, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[3]  K D Rudd,et al.  Compatibility of alginate impression materials and dental stones. , 1971, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  V A Merchant,et al.  Preliminary investigation of a method for disinfection of dental impressions. , 1984, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  G. Adabo,et al.  Effect of disinfectant agents on dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  L. Fabiani,et al.  Hygiene in dental practices. , 2006, European journal of paediatric dentistry.

[7]  A A Caputo,et al.  Effects of disinfectants on dimensional accuracy of impression materials. , 1990, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  D. Durr,et al.  Dimensional stability of alginate impressions immersed in disinfecting solutions. , 1988, Trends & techniques in the contemporary dental laboratory.

[9]  R. Leung,et al.  Gypsum casts as a potential source of microbial cross-contamination. , 1983, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  Revised American Dental Association Specification no. 19 for Non-aqueous, Elastomeric Dental Impression Materials. , 1977, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[11]  W. Amin,et al.  The relationships of the maxillary central incisors and canines to the incisive papilla in Jordanians. , 2008, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[12]  Equipment,et al.  Infection control recommendations for the dental office and the dental laboratory. , 1988, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[13]  V. Merchant,et al.  Dimensional stability of dental impressions after immersion disinfection. , 1986, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[14]  J. Berg,et al.  Surface characteristics of polyether and addition silicone impression materials after long-term disinfection. , 1995, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[15]  J. Cleveland,et al.  Guidelines for infection control in dental health-care settings--2003. , 2003, MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports.

[16]  J. A. Stackhouse,et al.  Dimensional changes of elastomers during cold sterilization. , 1987, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[17]  Durr Dp,et al.  Dimensional stability of alginate impressions immersed in disinfecting solutions. , 1987 .

[18]  A. Iost,et al.  Dimensional stability of seven elastomeric impression materials immersed in disinfectants. , 1996, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[19]  C. Palenik,et al.  Treating highly infectious patients in the dental office. , 1985, Journal.

[20]  Infection control recommendations for the dental office and the dental laboratory. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs and ADA Council on Dental Practice. , 1996, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[21]  Council adopts American Dental Association Specification no. 18 (alginate impression material). Council on Dental Materials and Devices. , 1968, Journal of the American Dental Association.