PCA Based Image Enhancement in Wavelet Domain

This paper demonstrates a methodology of image enhancement that uses principle component analysis (PCA) in wavelet domain. PCA fully de-correlates the original data set so that the energy of the signal will concentrate on the small subset of PCA transformed dataset. The energy of random noise evenly spreads over the whole data set, we can easily distinguish signal from random noise over PCA domain. It consists of two stages: image enhancement by removing the random noise and further refinement of the first stage. The random noise is significantly reduced in the first stage; the Local Pixel Grouping (LPG) accuracy will be much improved in the second stage so that the final enhancement result is visually much better. The LPG-PCA enhance procedure is used to improve the image quality from first stage to second stage with edge preservation. The wavelet thresholding methods used for removing random noise has been researched extensively due to its effectiveness and simplicity. However, not much has been done to make the threshold values adaptive to the spatially changing statistics of images. Such adaptivity can improve the wavelet thresholding performance because it allows additional local information of the image (such as the identification of smooth or edge regions) to be incorporated into the algorithm. We compare this two-stage process with traditional principal component analysis and find that the results of the new structure are closer to the structure of traditional quality of image, its purity and descriptors than traditional principal component analysis. Keywords—Wavelet, Wavelet Transform (WT), Local Pixel Grouping (LPG), Principal Components Analysis.

[1]  Zujun Hou,et al.  Adaptive singular value decomposition in wavelet domain for image denoising , 2003, Pattern Recognit..

[2]  Martin J. Wainwright,et al.  Image denoising using scale mixtures of Gaussians in the wavelet domain , 2003, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[3]  Aleksandra Pizurica,et al.  Estimating the probability of the presence of a signal of interest in multiresolution single- and multiband image denoising , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Multiscale LMMSE-based image denoising with optimal wavelet selection , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[5]  Karen O. Egiazarian,et al.  Pointwise Shape-Adaptive DCT for High-Quality Denoising and Deblocking of Grayscale and Color Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  The curvelet transform for image denoising , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[7]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to statistical pattern recognition (2nd ed.) , 1990 .

[8]  Balázs Kégl,et al.  Image denoising with complex ridgelets , 2007, Pattern Recognit..

[9]  Thomas W. Parks,et al.  Adaptive principal components and image denoising , 2003, Proceedings 2003 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.03CH37429).

[10]  Kannan Ramchandran,et al.  Low-complexity image denoising based on statistical modeling of wavelet coefficients , 1999, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[11]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Spatially adaptive wavelet thresholding with context modeling for image denoising , 1998, Proceedings 1998 International Conference on Image Processing. ICIP98 (Cat. No.98CB36269).

[12]  D. Donoho,et al.  Translation-Invariant DeNoising , 1995 .

[13]  David L. Donoho,et al.  De-noising by soft-thresholding , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.