The Effect of Robot Programming Education on Attitudes towards Robots

Background/Objectives: How robot programming education affects the attitude of pre-service teachers toward robots was analyzed, along with how pre-service teachers appreciate robot programming classes. Methods/Statistical Analysis: In this research, the Negative Attitude toward Robots Scale of Nomura et al. was used as a test tool. Research subjects were divided into an experimental group taking robot programming education and a control group taking ordinary classes. Both groups took a test to indicate their attitudes toward robots before and after the experiment; the experimental group also took a test asking their appreciation of robot programming education. Each group's test results were analyzed using paired t-tests and independent t-tests. The attitude toward robot programming education was analyzed through frequency analysis. Findings: Before the experiment, the groups' results did not show statistically significant differences; however, after the experiment, they did. Comparing pre- and post-testing of each group, the control group showed no significant difference; however, the experimental group showed significant difference. This implied that robot programming education affected pre-service teachers' attitudes toward robots, especially in a positive way. When asked their attitude toward robots, pre-service teachers answered that programming education promoted more interest in robots because they could make and realized with their own hand; however, the design and the assembly of robot would be negative. Pre-existing research had only studied attitudes toward robots and compared them by countries or investigated effect elements. This research focused on not only the attitude of pre-service teachers toward robots but also elements that could improve those attitudes. In follow-up studies, researchers could attempt to solve the imbalance of research subjects and add the group taking programming classes. Application/Improvements: The result of this study could be used for the development of robot education programs and basic material for the training of teachers.

[1]  Costas S. Tzafestas,et al.  Virtual and remote robotic laboratory: comparative experimental evaluation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[2]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Prediction of Human Behavior in Human--Robot Interaction Using Psychological Scales for Anxiety and Negative Attitudes Toward Robots , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[3]  Rolf T. Wigand,et al.  Exploring Web users' optimal flow experiences , 2000, Inf. Technol. People.

[4]  Innwoo Park,et al.  Learning Effects of Pedagogical Robots with Programming in Elementary School Environments in Korea , 2015 .

[5]  Ioannis Stamelos,et al.  Evaluating children performance with graphical and tangible robot programming tools , 2014, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[6]  Ghazi Shukur,et al.  The Effect of LEGO Training on Pupils' School Performance in Mathematics, Problem Solving Ability and Attitude: Swedish Data , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[8]  Won Gyu Lee,et al.  Assessing the Usefulness of Object-based Programming Education Using Arduino , 2015 .

[9]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human–robot interaction , 2006, AI & SOCIETY.

[10]  T. Kanda,et al.  Altered Attitudes of People toward Robots : Investigation through the Negative Attitudes toward Robots Scale ∗ , 2006 .

[11]  Ja Mee Kim,et al.  Consideration for the Acquisition of the Concept of Object in the Robot Programming , 2015 .

[12]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Implications on Humanoid Robots in Pedagogical Applications from Cross-Cultural Analysis between Japan, Korea, and the USA , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[13]  David J. Barnes,et al.  Teaching introductory Java through LEGO MINDSTORMS models , 2002, SIGCSE '02.

[14]  D. Freeman.  Teacher Training, Development, and Decision Making: A Model of Teaching and Related Strategies for Language Teacher Education. , 1989 .

[15]  A. Raub.  CORRELATES OF COMPUTER ANXIETY IN COLLEGE STUDENTS , 1981 .

[16]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Measurement of Anxiety toward Robots , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[17]  EunKyoung Lee,et al.  The Effects of Robot Programming on Pre-Service Computer Science Teacher Training , 2008 .

[18]  Douglas S. Blank.  Robots make computer science personal , 2006, CACM.

[19]  A. Muthu Kumaravel,et al.  Effectiveness in Teaching 'Introductory Programming' for the Students of Engineering and Technology: The Need of Hour , 2015 .

[20]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Cultural Differences in Attitudes Towards Robots , 2005 .

[21]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots , 2006, AI & SOCIETY.

[22]  송정범,et al.  An Effect of the Programming Learning using Robot on Attitude toward Computer Learning and Computer in Practical Arts Education , 2009 .

[23]  Toshinori Yamasaki,et al.  Exercise Analysis and Lesson Plan with Robot Behavior in LEGO Programming Contest for Problem Solving Learning , 2006 .