Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Lopinavir in HIV-Infected Children on Second-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in Asia

Background: Failure rates of second-line boosted protease inhibitor antiretroviral therapy regimens in children rise over time. Therapeutic drug monitoring can contribute to assessments of adherence. The authors assessed the performance characteristics of the US DHHS-recommended lopinavir (LPV) concentration of 1.0 mg/L for predicting virologic failure (VF) and intermediate- to high-level LPV resistance in Asian children. Methods: LPV concentration, HIV RNA level, and adherence data from study participants in Thailand, Vietnam, and Indonesia receiving second-line LPV-based ART and followed for ≥24 weeks were analyzed. Results: A total of 223 children at a median age of 10.4 (interquartile range, 7.9–13.4) years were enrolled, and 61% of them were male. Their mean CD4 was 842 ± 438 cells per cubic millimeter, and the median LPV duration was 2.5 (interquartile range, 1.3–4.2) years. Five of 84 (6%) and 18 of 139 (13%) children had LPV trough and random concentrations <1.0 mg/L at study week 24. Using either of these trough or random LPV concentrations, a cutoff at 1.0 mg/L gave an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.69 in predicting VF with sensitivity of 44% (95% CI 23–66) and specificity of 94% (95% CI 89–97). Seven of 21 with VF and resistance results available had ≥1 major protease inhibitor mutation. Multivariate logistic regression found LPV concentrations <1.0 mg/L (odds ratio, 6.47; 95% CI 2.15–19.50, P = 0.001) and CD4 ⩽20% (odds ratio, 2.83; 95% CI 1.01–7.89, P = 0.05) were independently associated with HIV RNA >1000 copies per milliliter. No factors predicted major LPV resistance mutations. Conclusions: The authors support that the DHHS target LPV concentration of <1.0 mg/L is predictive of VF, but not of the presence of major LPV mutations.

[1]  K. Mcintosh,et al.  Treatment Failure in HIV-Infected Children on Second-line Protease Inhibitor-Based Antiretroviral Therapy. , 2015, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[2]  G. Maartens,et al.  Plasma Lopinavir Concentrations Predict Virological Failure in a Cohort of South African Children Initiating a Protease-Inhibitor-Based Regimen , 2014, Antiviral therapy.

[3]  J. Ananworanich,et al.  High virologic response rate after second-line boosted protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy regimens in children from a resource limited setting , 2012, AIDS Research and Therapy.

[4]  N. Ford,et al.  Treatment outcomes of patients on second-line antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2012, AIDS.

[5]  J. Nachega,et al.  Low Lopinavir Plasma or Hair Concentrations Explain Second-Line Protease Inhibitor Failures in a Resource-Limited Setting , 2011, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[6]  D. Touw,et al.  The International Interlaboratory Quality Control Program for Measurement of Antiretroviral Drugs in Plasma: A Global Proficiency Testing Program , 2011, Therapeutic drug monitoring.

[7]  W. Prasitsuebsai,et al.  Pediatric HIV clinical care resources and management practices in Asia: a regional survey of the TREAT Asia pediatric network. , 2010, AIDS patient care and STDs.

[8]  J. Ananworanich,et al.  Safety and efficacy of a double-boosted protease inhibitor combination, saquinavir and lopinavir/ ritonavir, in pretreated children at 96 weeks , 2009, Antiviral therapy.

[9]  R. Haubrich,et al.  The Correlation between Plasma Concentrations of Protease Inhibitors, Medication Adherence and Virological Outcome in HIV-Infected Patients , 2004, Antiviral therapy.