How Do the Internet Buyers' Decisions Be Affected? - An Experimental Study of Risky Choice Framing Effect

For Net-enhanced organizations (NEOs), business is conducted at a distance and risks are magnified. In effect, Internet buyers can solely rely on information provided by the Web sites to make decisions. Consequently, the way to present information favorable to the Internet business operators is very important. This study aims to understand whether positively and negatively framed messages result in different choices made by the Internet buyers. Further, the effect of subject’s intrinsic self-relevance to the framing effect is also considered in the current study. The research is conducted by using laboratory experiment. The results indicate that the risky choice framing effect partly exists in Internet buyers’ product decisions. Specifically, when the subjects are highly related to the research context, they won’t be affected by the framing of messages because they are eager to obtain the target product. As a result, most subjects are prone to avoid risks. On the other hand, there is significant risky choice framing effect for subjects with low intrinsic self-relevance. In this group, subjects are prone to avoid risks when they were presented with positive information, whereas most people incline to take risks, and thus choose the risky option if the problem are framed negatively.

[1]  Peter Salovey,et al.  The Influence of Message Framing on Intentions to Perform Health Behaviors , 1993 .

[2]  Yoav Ganzach,et al.  Message framing and buying behavior: A field experiment , 1995 .

[3]  I. Levin,et al.  A New Look at Framing Effects: Distribution of Effect Sizes, Individual Differences, and Independence of Types of Effects , 2002 .

[4]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  A Fundamental Prediction Error: Self-Others Discrepancies in Risk Preference , 1997 .

[5]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Associative effects of information framing , 1987 .

[6]  R. Thaler Toward a positive theory of consumer choice , 1980 .

[7]  Scott Highhouse,et al.  Perspectives, Perceptions, and Risk-Taking Behavior , 1996 .

[8]  J. Gotlieb,et al.  The Moderating Effects of Message Framing and Source Credibility on the Price-perceived Risk Relationship , 1994 .

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[10]  I. Levin,et al.  Confidence in judgments based on incomplete information: An investigation using both hypothetical and real gambles , 1988 .

[11]  P. Miller,et al.  The Effect of Framing on Choice , 1990 .

[12]  Richard L. Celsi,et al.  The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes , 1988 .

[13]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Consumer Behavior , 2024 .

[14]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  M. Bazerman,et al.  The Effects of Framing and Negotiator Overconfidence on Bargaining Behaviors and Outcomes , 1985 .

[16]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Measuring e-Commerce in Net-Enabled Organizations: An Introduction to the Special Issue , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Framing effects in judgment tasks with varying amounts of information , 1985 .

[18]  J. Fleishman,et al.  The Effects of Decision Framing and Others' Behavior on Cooperation in a Social Dilemma , 1988 .

[19]  John H. Antil Conceptualization and Operationalization of Involvement , 1984 .

[20]  I. Levin,et al.  How Consumers Are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information Before and After Consuming the Product , 1988 .

[21]  A. Kühberger,et al.  The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions: A Meta-analysis. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[22]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[23]  Schneider,et al.  All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[24]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[25]  E. Blair,et al.  Attribute Framing and Goal Framing Effects in Health Decisions. , 2001, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[26]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  Anton Kühberger,et al.  The Framing of Decisions: A New Look at Old Problems , 1995 .

[28]  W. Bottom,et al.  Negotiator Risk: Sources of Uncertainty and the Impact of Reference Points on Negotiated Agreements. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[29]  S. Schneider,et al.  Framing and conflict: aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risky choice. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.