Assessing the impact of temporal dynamics on land-use change modeling

Time is a fundamental dimension in dynamic land-use change modeling. An appropriate treatment of time is essential to realistically simulate landscape dynamics. Current land-use models provide little justification of their treatment of time. As a result, little is known about how the time dimension impacts the spatio-temporal patterns produced by land-use simulation models. This paper reports a first exploration on this issue. It examines the impact of the degree of temporal dynamics on the behavior of an urban growth model which is based on a modified Markov random field and probabilistic cellular automata. Experimental results from this case study suggest that the degree of temporal dynamics does have an important impact on the urban morphology produced by the model. Too much or too little dynamics could both lead to unrealistic patterns. However, the impact seems to vary for processes with different levels of change intensity. In the case of a process with moderate changes, the impact of temporal dynamics is also moderate. For a process with high change rate, the degree of temporal dynamics affects the model output significantly. The implication of these findings is discussed in the context of information accessibility and operational land-use modeling.

[1]  B. C. Hazen,et al.  Lucas: a system for modeling land-use change , 1996 .

[2]  H. Schuster Deterministic chaos: An introduction , 1984 .

[3]  Geoffrey C. Fox,et al.  Parallel Computing Works , 1994 .

[4]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  Loose-Coupling a Cellular Automaton Model and GIS: Long-Term Urban Growth Prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[5]  Guy Engelen,et al.  Cellular Automata as the Basis of Integrated Dynamic Regional Modelling , 1997 .

[6]  Michael Batty,et al.  Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function , 1996 .

[7]  Ming Zhang,et al.  The Second Generation of the California Urban Futures Model. Part 2: Specification and Calibration Results of the Land-Use Change Submodel , 1998 .

[8]  G. Langran Time in Geographic Information Systems , 1990 .

[9]  E. Silvaa,et al.  Calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model for Lisbon and Porto, Portugal , 2002 .

[10]  Daniel Z. Sui,et al.  GIS-Based Urban Modelling: Practices, Problem, and Prospects , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[11]  I Rotter Exceptional points and double poles of the S matrix. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  M. Wegener Operational Urban Models State of the Art , 1994 .

[13]  Donna Peuquet,et al.  An Event-Based Spatiotemporal Data Model (ESTDM) for Temporal Analysis of Geographical Data , 1995, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[14]  P. Waddell UrbanSim: Modeling Urban Development for Land Use, Transportation, and Environmental Planning , 2002 .

[15]  S. Resnick Adventures in stochastic processes , 1992 .

[16]  M. Batty,et al.  Advances in urban systems modelling , 1986 .

[17]  Michael Wegener,et al.  THE TIME SCALE OF URBAN CHANGE , 1986 .

[18]  B. Berry,et al.  Central places in Southern Germany , 1967 .

[19]  F. Wu,et al.  Simulation of Land Development through the Integration of Cellular Automata and Multicriteria Evaluation , 1998 .

[20]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  A Self-Modifying Cellular Automaton Model of Historical Urbanization in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1997 .

[21]  Elisabete A. Silva,et al.  Calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model for Lisbon and Porto, Portugal , 2002 .

[22]  Steen Rasmussen,et al.  Urban Settlement Transitions , 2002 .