Teachers as Designers of Technology-Enhanced Outdoor Inquiry

Implementing inquiry in the outdoors introduces many challenges for teachers, some of which can be dealt with using mobile technologies. For productive use of these technologies, teachers should be provided with the opportunity to develop relevant knowledge and practices. In a professional development (PD) program in this design-based research, 24 teachers were involved in adaptation of a learning environment supporting inquiry in the outdoors that included the use of mobile technologies. They first experienced the learning environment as learners, then adapted it for their own use, and finally, enacted the adapted environment with peers. We examined the scope and character of teacher involvement in adaptation, and the consequent professional growth, by analyzing observations, questionnaires, interviews and the adapted learningenvironments. Findings indicate that all teachers demonstrated change processes, including changes in knowledge and practice, but the coherence of the learning environments decreased when substantial adaptations were made. Some teachers demonstrated professional growth, as reflected by their implementation of ideas learned in the PD program in their daily practice, long after the PD program had ended. This study demonstrates how the Teachers as Designers approach can support teacher learning and illustrates productive use of scaffolds for teacher growth and professional development.

[1]  R. Bybee Designing coherent science education: Implications for curriculum, instruction, and policy , 2009 .

[2]  Yael Kali,et al.  Teaching to design educational technologies , 2011, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[3]  Activity and Action: Bridging Environmental Sciences and Environmental Education , 2013 .

[4]  Barbara A. Crawford,et al.  From Inquiry to Scientific Practices in the Science Classroom , 2014 .

[5]  Daniel P. Shepardson,et al.  Teaching and Learning About Inquiry: Insights and Challenges in Professional Development , 2007 .

[6]  Yael Kali,et al.  A fingerprint pattern of supports for teachers’ designing of technology-enhanced learning , 2015 .

[7]  Joke Voogt,et al.  Teacher roles in designing technology-rich learning activities for early literacy: A cross-case analysis , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[8]  K. Squire,et al.  Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground , 2004 .

[9]  Philip Crowther,et al.  Understanding the signature pedagogy of the design studio and the opportunities for its technological enhancement , 2013 .

[10]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come , 2004 .

[11]  Yael Kali,et al.  Technology-Enhanced Support Strategies for Inquiry Learning , 2007 .

[12]  Revital T. Tal Incorporating field trips as science learning environment enrichment – an interpretive study , 2001 .

[13]  David A. Gillam,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2012 .

[14]  Mike Sharples,et al.  A theory of learning for the mobile age: learning through conversation and exploration across contexts , 2010 .

[15]  William A. Sandoval,et al.  Conjecture Mapping: An Approach to Systematic Educational Design Research , 2014 .

[16]  Shoshana Keiny,et al.  Assessing conceptual change of teachers involved in STES education and curriculum devleopment - the STEMS project approach , 2001 .

[17]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  What Good Is Polarizing Research Into Qualitative and Quantitative? , 2006 .

[18]  Y. Dori,et al.  Case‐based Long‐term Professional Development of Science Teachers , 2005 .

[19]  Peter Lonsdale,et al.  Myartspace: Design and evaluation of support for learning with multimedia phones between classrooms and museums , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Lawrence P. Gallagher,et al.  What Makes Professional Development Effective? Strategies That Foster Curriculum Implementation , 2007 .

[21]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Student use of multimodal data and metadata tools during nomadic inquiry , 2011 .

[22]  T. Tal,et al.  Assessing Learning in the Outdoors with the Field Trip in Natural Environments (FiNE) Framework , 2012 .

[23]  J. Krajcik,et al.  Curriculum Coherence and Learning Progressions , 2012 .

[24]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  What Happens When Teachers Design Educational Technology? The Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2005 .

[25]  Alain Breuleux,et al.  Collaborative design as a form of professional development , 2014, Instructional Science.

[26]  Balachander Krishnamurthy,et al.  Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 , 2008, First Monday.

[27]  M. Chi Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data: A Practical Guide , 1997 .

[28]  Hilary Hollingsworth,et al.  Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth , 2002 .

[29]  T. Tal,et al.  Student Self-Reported Learning Outcomes of Field Trips: The pedagogical impact , 2015 .

[30]  Revital T. Tal,et al.  Guided School Visits to Natural History Museums in Israel: Teachers' Roles , 2005 .

[31]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Socio-technical dimensions of an outdoor mobile learning environment: a three-phase design-based research investigation , 2015 .

[32]  Nir Orion,et al.  A Model for the Development and Implementation of Field Trips as an Integral Part of the Science Curriculum. , 1993 .

[33]  Yael Kali,et al.  Assimilating Online Technologies into School Culture , 2009 .

[34]  B. Crawford Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers , 2000 .

[35]  Yael Kali,et al.  The Design Principles Database as a Means for Promoting Design-Based Research , 2008 .

[36]  J. Osborne Scientific Practices and Inquiry in the Science Classroom , 2014 .

[37]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment , 1994 .

[38]  Elliot Soloway,et al.  1: 1 Mobile Inquiry Learning Experience for Primary Science Students: a Study of Learning Effectiveness , 2011, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[39]  Michal Zion,et al.  The Spectrum of Dynamic Inquiry Teaching Practices , 2007 .

[40]  Mathias Beike Designing Professional Development For Teachers Of Science And Mathematics , 2016 .

[41]  Tali Tal,et al.  Exemplary practices in field trips to natural environments , 2014 .

[42]  J. Dillon,et al.  The value of outdoor learning: evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere , 2006 .

[43]  Revital T. Tal,et al.  Characteristics and Difficulties of Teachers Who Mentor Environmental Inquiry Projects , 2005 .

[44]  Mike Sharples,et al.  Creating Personal Meaning through Technology-Supported Science Inquiry Learning across Formal and Informal Settings , 2012 .

[45]  Katerine Bielaczyc,et al.  Designing Social Infrastructure: Critical Issues in Creating Learning Environments With Technology , 2006 .

[46]  L. Shulman Those who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 2013 .

[47]  Adi Kidron,et al.  Technology-Enhanced Learning Communities on a Continuum between Ambient to Designed: What Can We Learn by Synthesizing Multiple Research Perspectives? , 2015, CSCL.

[48]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[49]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Scaffolding , 2014 .

[50]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Second international handbook of science education , 2012 .

[51]  Michele W. Spitulnik,et al.  Teacher Use of Evidence to Customize Inquiry Science Instruction. , 2010 .

[52]  Tsvi Kuflik,et al.  Harnessing Technology for Promoting Undergraduate Art Education: A Novel Model that Streamlines Learning between Classroom, Museum, and Home , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[53]  J. Voogt,et al.  Teacher Learning in Collaborative Curriculum Design. , 2011 .

[54]  Yael Kali,et al.  Teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning , 2015, Instructional Science.