Motion sensor strategies for automated optimization of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). Optimization of DBS settings can be a challenge due to the number of variables that must be considered, including presence of multiple motor signs, side effects, and battery life. METHODS Nine PD subjects visited the clinic for programming at approximately 1, 2, and 4 months post-surgery. During each session, various stimulation settings were assessed and subjects performed motor tasks while wearing a motion sensor to quantify tremor and bradykinesia. At the end of each session, a clinician determined final stimulation settings using standard practices. Sensor-based ratings of motor symptom severities collected during programming were then used to develop two automated programming algorithms--one to optimize symptom benefit and another to optimize battery life. Therapeutic benefit was compared between the final clinician-determined DBS settings and those calculated by the automated algorithm. RESULTS Settings determined using the symptom optimization algorithm would have reduced motor symptoms by an additional 13 percentage points when compared to clinician settings, typically at the expense of increased stimulation amplitude. By adding a battery life constraint, the algorithm would have been able to decrease stimulation amplitude by an average of 50% while maintaining the level of therapeutic benefit observed using clinician settings for a subset of programming sessions. CONCLUSIONS Objective assessment in DBS programming can identify settings that improve symptoms or obtain similar benefit as clinicians with improvement in battery life. Both options have the potential to improve post-operative patient outcomes.

[1]  M. Okun,et al.  STN vs. GPi Deep Brain Stimulation: Translating the Rematch into Clinical Practice. , 2014, Movement disorders clinical practice.

[2]  G. Deuschl,et al.  A randomized trial of deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  L. Bour,et al.  Subthalamic nucleus versus globus pallidus bilateral deep brain stimulation for advanced Parkinson's disease (NSTAPS study): a randomised controlled trial , 2013, The Lancet Neurology.

[4]  Lessons learned from a large single center cohort of patients referred for DBS management. , 2011, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[5]  Joseph P. Giuffrida,et al.  Kinematic optimization of deep brain stimulation across multiple motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  M. Okun,et al.  Subthalamic Nucleus Versus Globus Pallidus Internus Deep Brain Stimulation: Translating the Rematch Into Clinical Practice , 2014 .

[7]  D. Heldman,et al.  Clinician versus machine: reliability and responsiveness of motor endpoints in Parkinson's disease. , 2014, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[8]  Joohi Jimenez-Shahed,et al.  Rechargeable Deep Brain Stimulation Implantable Pulse Generators in Movement Disorders: Patient Satisfaction and Conversion Parameters , 2014, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[9]  Lars Timmermann,et al.  Multiple source current steering--a novel deep brain stimulation concept for customized programming in a Parkinson's disease patient. , 2014, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[10]  Robert Chen,et al.  The modified bradykinesia rating scale for Parkinson's disease: Reliability and comparison with kinematic measures , 2011, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[11]  R. Kumar,et al.  Methods for programming and patient management with deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus for the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease and dystonia , 2002, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[12]  J. Jankovic,et al.  Movement Disorder Society‐sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS‐UPDRS): Scale presentation and clinimetric testing results , 2008, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[13]  Erwin B. Montgomery,et al.  Deep Brain Stimulation Programming: Principles and Practice , 2010 .

[14]  H. Miwa,et al.  Parkinsonism and Related Disorders , 2011 .

[15]  Joseph P. Giuffrida,et al.  Clinically deployable Kinesia™ technology for automated tremor assessment , 2009, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[16]  Elena Moro,et al.  Subthalamic nucleus stimulation: improvements in outcome with reprogramming. , 2006, Archives of neurology.

[17]  Marwan Hariz,et al.  Deep brain stimulation: new techniques. , 2014, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[18]  M. Okun,et al.  Management of referred deep brain stimulation failures: a retrospective analysis from 2 movement disorders centers. , 2005, Archives of neurology.

[19]  T. Yamamoto,et al.  Subthalamic nucleus stimulation for Parkinson disease: benefits observed in levodopa-intolerant patients. , 2001, Journal of neurosurgery.

[20]  Z. Kiss,et al.  Nursing time to program and assess deep brain stimulators in movement disorder patients. , 2005, The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses.

[21]  W. Oyen,et al.  Pallidal dysfunction drives a cerebellothalamic circuit into Parkinson tremor , 2011, Annals of neurology.

[22]  M. Hallett,et al.  Cerebral causes and consequences of parkinsonian resting tremor: a tale of two circuits? , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  Michael S. Okun,et al.  The temporal pattern of stimulation may be important to the mechanism of deep brain stimulation , 2013, Experimental Neurology.

[24]  J. Volkmann,et al.  Basic algorithms for the programming of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease , 2006, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.