Observers for Hybrid Dynamical Systems with Linear Maps and Known Jump Times

This paper proposes a general framework for the state estimation of plants given by hybrid systems with linear flow and jump maps, in the favorable case where their jump events can be detected instantaneously. A candidate observer consists of a copy of the plant's hybrid dynamics with continuous-time and/or discrete-time correction terms adjusted by two constant gains, and with jumps triggered by those of the plant. Assuming that the time between successive jumps is known to belong to a given closed set allows us to formulate an augmented system with a timer which keeps track of the time elapsed between successive jumps and facilitates the analysis. Then, since the jumps of the plant and of the observer are synchronized, the error system has time-invariant linear flow and jump maps, and a Lyapunov analysis leads to sufficient conditions on the design of the gains for uniform asymptotic stability in three different settings: continuous and discrete updates, only discrete updates, or only continuous updates. Those conditions take the form of matrix inequalities, which we solve in examples including cases where the time between successive jumps is unbounded or tends to zero (Zeno behavior).

[1]  Antonio Ramírez-Treviño,et al.  On the observer design problem for continuous-time switched linear systems with unknown switchings , 2015, J. Frankl. Inst..

[2]  Xinghuo Yu,et al.  On controllability and observability for a class of impulsive systems , 2002, Syst. Control. Lett..

[3]  B. Paden,et al.  Observers for linear systems with quantized outputs , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No.97CH36041).

[4]  Hyungbo Shim,et al.  Observability for Switched Linear Systems: Characterization and Observer Design , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[5]  Ricardo G. Sanfelice,et al.  State estimation of linear systems in the presence of sporadic measurements , 2016, Autom..

[6]  Ricardo G. Sanfelice,et al.  Hybrid Dynamical Systems: Modeling, Stability, and Robustness , 2012 .

[7]  Luca Zaccarian,et al.  Follow the Bouncing Ball: Global Results on Tracking and State Estimation With Impacts , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[8]  Jitao Sun,et al.  Controllability and observability for a class of time-varying impulsive systems☆ , 2009 .

[9]  A. Alessandri,et al.  Switching observers for continuous-time and discrete-time linear systems , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference. (Cat. No.01CH37148).

[10]  Hyungbo Shim,et al.  State estimation strategy without jump detection for hybrid systems using gluing function , 2014, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[11]  Enrique A. Medina,et al.  Reachability and observability of linear impulsive systems , 2008, Autom..

[12]  Ricardo G. Sanfelice,et al.  On Robustness of Pre-Asymptotic Stability to Delayed Jumps in Hybrid Systems , 2018, 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC).

[13]  Enrique A. Medina,et al.  State estimation for linear impulsive systems , 2009, 2009 American Control Conference.

[14]  Ferdinand Küsters,et al.  Switch observability for switched linear systems , 2018, Autom..

[15]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  Observability of Linear Hybrid Systems , 2003, HSCC.

[16]  Frank Allgöwer,et al.  Observers with impulsive dynamical behavior for linear and nonlinear continuous-time systems , 2007, 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[17]  Alberto L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli,et al.  The design of dynamical observers for hybrid systems: Theory and application to an automotive control problem , 2012, Autom..