A process mapping model for calculating indirect costs of workplace accidents.

UNLABELLED This article follows an earlier one in which four criteria and four bases for the development of an indirect-cost calculation model adapted to the accuracy requirements and time constraints of workplace decision-makers were established. A two-level model for calculating indirect costs using process mapping of the organizational response to a workplace accident is presented. The model is based on data collected in interviews with those employees in charge of occupational health and safety in 10 companies of various sizes in different industry sectors. This model is the first to use process mapping to establish the indirect costs of workplace accidents. The approach allows easy identification of the duration and frequency of actions taken by stakeholders when a workplace accident occurs, facilitates the collection of the information needed to calculate indirect costs and yields a usable, precise result. A simple graphic representation of an organization's accident processes helps the user understand each accident's cost components, allowing the identification and reduction of inefficiencies in the overall process. IMPACT ON INDUSTRY By facilitating data collection and shortening the time needed to assess indirect costs of workplace accidents, this indirect cost calculation tool is better suited for workplace use than those currently available.

[1]  Rafael Amador-Rodezno An overview to CERSSO's self evaluation of the cost-benefit on the investment in occupational safety and health in the textile factories: "a step by step methodology". , 2005, Journal of safety research.

[2]  Philippe Dumas,et al.  La méthode OSSAD : pour maîtriser les technologies de l'information , 1990 .

[3]  PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT Safety Performance Measurement : IDENTIFYING PROSPECTIVE INDICATORS WITH HIGH VALIDITY , .

[4]  Pall M Rikhardsson,et al.  Corporate cost of occupational accidents: an activity-based analysis. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Maurice S. Oxenburgh Cost-Benefit Analysis of Ergonomics Programs , 1997 .

[6]  Jorma Saari,et al.  The accident consequence tree method and its application by real-time data collection in the Finnish furniture industry , 1996 .

[7]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  Estimating uninsured costs of work-related accidents, part II: an incidence-based model , 2006 .

[8]  Bernard Brody,et al.  An indirect cost theory of work accident prevention , 1990 .

[9]  Daniel Imbeau,et al.  Development of an indirect-cost calculation model suitable for workplace use. , 2011, Journal of safety research.

[10]  Sam Salem,et al.  Estimating the uninsured costs of work-related accidents, part I: a systematic review , 2006 .

[11]  Daniel Corcoran,et al.  The value of estimating the hidden costs of accidents. , 2002, Occupational health & safety.

[12]  M A Koopmanschap,et al.  The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease. , 1995, Journal of health economics.

[13]  Stig Vinberg,et al.  A statistical human resources costing and accounting model for analysing the economic effects of an intervention at a workplace , 2002, Ergonomics.

[14]  Supriya Lahiri,et al.  Net-cost model for workplace interventions. , 2005, Journal of safety research.

[15]  Arieh Gavious,et al.  The costs of industrial accidents for the organization: Developing methods and tools for evaluation and cost–benefit analysis of investment in safety , 2009 .

[16]  Markku V.P. Aaltonen,et al.  Computer‐aided calculation of accident costs , 1997 .

[17]  Peregrin Spielholz,et al.  Estimating the effectiveness of ergonomics interventions through case studies: implications for predictive cost-benefit analysis. , 2008, Journal of safety research.

[18]  Kevin D. Frick,et al.  A Review of Health-Related Workplace Productivity Loss Instruments , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.