Coupling machine learning with 3D bioprinting to fast track optimisation of extrusion printing

Abstract 3D bioprinting, a paradigm shift in tissue engineering holds a promising perspective for regenerative medicine and disease modelling. 3D scaffolds are fabricated for subsequent cell seeding or incorporated directly to the bioink to create cell-laden 3D constructs. A plethora of factors relating to bioink properties, printing parameters and post print curing play a significant role in the optimisation of the printing process. Although qualitative evaluation of printability has been investigated largely, there is a paucity of studies on quantitative approaches to assess printability. Hence, this study explores machine learning as a novel tool to evaluate printability quantitatively and to fast track optimisation of extrusion printing in achieving a reproducible 3D scaffold. Bayesian Optimisation, a machine learning method has been employed for optimising 3D bioplotting with a scoring system established to assess the printability of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) and hyaluronic acid methacrylate (HAMA) bioinks. The performance of two fundamental criteria encountered in the printing process: the filament formation of the bioink and the layer stacking of the 3D scaffold have been incorporated in the scoring metric. The optimal print parameters for GelMA containing inks with ranging concentrations (10%, 7.5% & 5% (w/v)) were obtained in 19, 4 & 47 experiments whereas for GelMA:HAMA (10:2%, 7.5:2% & 5:2% (w/v)) 32, 25 & 32 experiments were required respectively. This number of experiments is drastically reduced compared to the 6000 to 10 000 possible combinations in the Bayesian algorithm. Hence, this study will be a stepping-stone into unravelling the benefits of machine learning in this rapidly developing area of 3D bioprinting.

[1]  Wim E. Hennink,et al.  Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels , 2002 .

[2]  Cheng Li,et al.  Rapid Bayesian optimisation for synthesis of short polymer fiber materials , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Wei Sun,et al.  The influence of printing parameters on cell survival rate and printability in microextrusion-based 3D cell printing technology , 2015, Biofabrication.

[4]  Vladimir Mironov,et al.  Organ printing: computer-aided jet-based 3D tissue engineering. , 2003, Trends in biotechnology.

[5]  Alexander L. Davis,et al.  Expert-guided optimization for 3D printing of soft and liquid materials , 2018, PloS one.

[6]  C. Decker Light‐induced crosslinking polymerization , 2002 .

[7]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[8]  Yasamin A. Jodat,et al.  3D Printed Cartilage‐Like Tissue Constructs with Spatially Controlled Mechanical Properties , 2019, Advanced functional materials.

[9]  N. Azarpira,et al.  Liver tissue engineering as an emerging alternative for liver disease treatment. , 2019, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[10]  Wei Sun,et al.  Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells , 2016, Biofabrication.

[11]  Gordon G Wallace,et al.  Development of the Biopen: a handheld device for surgical printing of adipose stem cells at a chondral wound site , 2016, Biofabrication.

[12]  Vladimir Mironov,et al.  Review: bioprinting: a beginning. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[13]  Qing Gao,et al.  Research on the printability of hydrogels in 3D bioprinting , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[14]  Johnson H. Y. Chung,et al.  Bio-ink properties and printability for extrusion printing living cells. , 2013, Biomaterials science.

[15]  Krishna Rajan,et al.  Information Science for Materials Discovery and Design , 2016 .

[16]  F. Melchels,et al.  Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability , 2017, Biofabrication.

[17]  Dazhong Wu,et al.  Predictive Modeling of Droplet Formation Processes in Inkjet-Based Bioprinting , 2018, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering.

[18]  G. Wallace,et al.  On Low-Concentration Inks Formulated by Nanocellulose Assisted with Gelatin Methacrylate (GelMA) for 3D Printing toward Wound Healing Application , 2019, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[19]  Ibrahim T. Ozbolat,et al.  The bioink: A comprehensive review on bioprintable materials. , 2017, Biotechnology advances.

[20]  Gordon G Wallace,et al.  Tailoring the mechanical properties of gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels through manipulation of the photocrosslinking conditions. , 2018, Soft matter.

[21]  Santu Rana,et al.  Bayesian Optimization for Adaptive Experimental Design: A Review , 2020, IEEE Access.

[22]  S. Van Vlierberghe,et al.  Bioink properties before, during and after 3D bioprinting , 2016, Biofabrication.

[23]  X. B. Chen,et al.  Characterization of the flow behavior of alginate/hydroxyapatite mixtures for tissue scaffold fabrication , 2009, Biofabrication.

[24]  Léa J Pourchet,et al.  Human Skin 3D Bioprinting Using Scaffold‐Free Approach , 2017, Advanced healthcare materials.

[25]  Niklas Sandler,et al.  Vascularized 3D printed scaffolds for promoting bone regeneration. , 2019, Biomaterials.

[26]  Jinchun Song,et al.  Multi-Objective Optimization Design through Machine Learning for Drop-on-Demand Bioprinting , 2019, Engineering.

[27]  A. Gaharwar,et al.  Advanced Bioinks for 3D Printing: A Materials Science Perspective , 2016, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  R. Landers,et al.  Rapid prototyping of scaffolds derived from thermoreversible hydrogels and tailored for applications in tissue engineering. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[29]  Anthony Atala,et al.  Optimization of gelatin–alginate composite bioink printability using rheological parameters: a systematic approach , 2018, Biofabrication.

[30]  Xuan Zhou,et al.  Recent advances in 3D printing: vascular network for tissue and organ regeneration. , 2019, Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine.

[31]  You Han Bae,et al.  Thermosensitive sol-gel reversible hydrogels. , 2002, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[32]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Information-Theoretic Regret Bounds for Gaussian Process Optimization in the Bandit Setting , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[33]  P. R. van Weeren,et al.  Gelatin-methacrylamide hydrogels as potential biomaterials for fabrication of tissue-engineered cartilage constructs. , 2013, Macromolecular bioscience.