Equivalent comfort contours for vertical seat vibration: effect of vibration magnitude and backrest inclination

This study determined how backrest inclination and the frequency and magnitude of vertical seat vibration influence vibration discomfort. Subjects experienced vertical seat vibration at frequencies in the range 2.5–25 Hz at vibration magnitudes in the range 0.016–2.0 ms−2 r.m.s. Equivalent comfort contours were determined with five backrest conditions: no backrest, and with a stationary backrest inclined at 0° (upright), 30°, 60° and 90°. Within all conditions, the frequency of greatest sensitivity to acceleration decreased with increasing vibration magnitude. Compared to an upright backrest, around the main resonance of the body, the vibration magnitudes required to cause similar discomfort were 100% greater with 60° and 90° backrest inclinations and 50% greater with a 30° backrest inclination. It is concluded that no single frequency weighting provides an accurate prediction of the discomfort caused by vertical seat vibration at all magnitudes and with all backrest conditions. Practitioner Summary: Vertical seat vibration is a main cause of vibration discomfort for drivers and passengers of road vehicles. A frequency weighting has been standardised for the evaluation of vertical seat vibration when sitting upright but it was not known whether this weighting is suitable for the reclined sitting postures often adopted during travel.

[1]  Toshisuke Miwa.  EVALUATION METHODS FOR VIBRATION EFFECT , 1968 .

[2]  Yoshiharu Yonekawa,et al.  EVALUATION METHODS FOR VIBRATION EFFECT:PART 9. RESPONSE TO SINUSOIDAL VIBRATION AT LYING POSTURE , 1969 .

[3]  R. W. Shoenberger,et al.  Psychophysical Assessment of Whole-Body Vibration , 1971, Human factors.

[4]  D. J. Saunders,et al.  Effects of postural and methodological changes on equal comfort contours for whole body, vertical, sinusoidal vibration , 1972 .

[5]  M J Griffin,et al.  Subjective equivalence of sinusoidal and random whole-body vibration. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  D J Oborne,et al.  Subjective response to whole-body vibration. The effects of posture. , 1982, Ergonomics.

[7]  K C Parsons,et al.  Vibration and comfort. I. Translational seat vibration. , 1982, Ergonomics.

[8]  Richard W. Shoenberger.  Subjective Response to Whole-Body Vibration , 1982 .

[9]  P Donati,et al.  The subjective equivalence of sinusoidal and random whole-body vibration in the sitting position (an experimental study using the "floating reference vibration" method). , 1983, Ergonomics.

[10]  Kazuo Kanada,et al.  Thresholds of perception of vibration in recumbent men , 1984 .

[11]  M J Griffin,et al.  Vibration and comfort: vertical and lateral motion in the range 0.5 to 5.0 Hz. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[12]  M. Griffin,et al.  Whole-body vibration perception thresholds , 1988 .

[13]  M J Griffin,et al.  The apparent mass of the seated human body: vertical vibration. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  H.-K. Jang,et al.  The effect of phase of differential vertical vibration at the seat and feet on discomfort , 1999 .

[15]  Y Yonekawa,et al.  Whole-body vibration perception thresholds of recumbent subjects--Part 1: Supine posture. , 1999, Industrial health.

[16]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  EFFECT OF PHASE, FREQUENCY, MAGNITUDE AND POSTURE ON DISCOMFORT ASSOCIATED WITH DIFFERENTIAL VERTICAL VIBRATION AT THE SEAT AND FEET , 2000 .

[17]  Michael J Griffin,et al.  Non-linear characteristics in the dynamic responses of seated subjects exposed to vertical whole-body vibration. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[18]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Magnitude-dependence of equivalent comfort contours for fore-and-aft, lateral and vertical whole-body vibration , 2006 .

[19]  T. Miwa,et al.  EVALUATION METHODS FOR VIBRATION EFFECT PART 1. MEASUREMENTS OF THRESHOLD AND EQUAL SENSATION CONTOURS OF WHOLE BODY FOR VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL VIBRATIONS , 2008 .

[20]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Nonlinear dual-axis biodynamic response of the semi-supine human body during vertical whole-body vibration , 2008 .

[21]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Nonlinearity in apparent mass and transmissibility of the supine human body during vertical whole-body vibration , 2009 .

[22]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Apparent mass of the human body in the vertical direction: Effect of seat backrest , 2009 .

[23]  Setsuo Maeda,et al.  Determination of backrest inclination based on biodynamic response study for prevention of low back pain. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[24]  Bazil Basri,et al.  The vibration of inclined backrests: perception and discomfort of vibration applied parallel to the back in the z-axis of the body , 2011, Ergonomics.

[25]  S R Holmes,et al.  The influence of seat backrest angle on human performance during whole-body vibration , 2012, Ergonomics.

[26]  Christine M. Haslegrave,et al.  Bodyspace: Anthropometry, Ergonomics and the Design of Work, Third Edition , 2016 .