Modelling effective brain connectivity using manifolds in optical functional neuroimaging

The development of analytical approaches for decoding brain’s effective connectivity from neuroimages remains open to improvement as existing model assumptions depart from physiological processes. Manifold based topological approaches are surprisingly underexplored considering the powerful mathematical abstraction they represent. This research hypothesizes that the brain function abides to the topological abstraction of a manifold, and thus the subsequent interactions among brain regions underpinning functional and effective connectivity can be expressed either as locations within the manifold or as trips along the manifold surface. In seeking to confirm this hypothesis, the aim is to develop a model of brain effective connectivity capitalizing on topological modelling of neurophysiological processes so that the connectivity network can retrieved from experimental neuroimaging data. As the physics of the image formation shall determine the topological characteristics of the dataset, the modelling will have to consider such modality-specific demands; in the case at hand, those of functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). To realize this goal, first the topological properties (continuity, differentiality and existence of a suitable metric) of the data will be characterized and the needs to represent the segregational response attended. It will be shown how the ambient Euclidean distance is insufficient for these purposes. Later, the integrational information will be univocally integrated within the direction of the flow of information first along a Riemann manifold by means of imposing a metric inspired on causal principles. Finally the inherent causal structure of certain manifolds such as the Lorentzian, will be harness to afford a computationally efficient modelling solution. Verification against synthetic scenarios and posterior validation against gold standard Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) over experimental observation will be carried out for the two modelling proposals. One important contribution in computational neuroscience of this thesis shall be the establishment of the foundations for topological modelling of brain function; an approach which has been hinted in literature but it is thus far lacking robust foundational mathematical support . Also, two major manifold-based modelling approaches i.e. Riemmanian and Lorentzian, will be explored. Finally, additional definition and establishment of topological constraints to be demanded to the resulting manifolds will be characterized so to ensure compliance with neurophysiological conditions and the exploitation of existing, or imposition of causal structure of manifolds to encode brain’s effective connectivity. Successful completion of this research will provide new computational insights about topological modelling that should in principle be transferable to other domains, and it will further offer a new highly expressive causal modelling approach for one of the most important phenomenon to understand brain behaviour, effective connectivity.

[1]  David A Boas,et al.  A cerebrovascular response model for functional neuroimaging including dynamic cerebral autoregulation. , 2009, Mathematical biosciences.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional topography: multidimensional scaling and functional connectivity in the brain. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  P. Collier A Most Incomprehensible Thing: Notes Towards a Very Gentle Introduction to the Mathematics of Relativity , 2013 .

[4]  N. Hicks Notes on Differential Geometry , 1967 .

[5]  R. Turner,et al.  Event-Related fMRI: Characterizing Differential Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[6]  M. Schweiger,et al.  Image reconstruction in optical tomography. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[7]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Detection of Brain Functional-Connectivity Difference in Post-stroke Patients Using Group-Level Covariance Modeling , 2010, MICCAI.

[8]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Assessment of the cerebral cortex during motor task behaviours in adults: A systematic review of functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) studies , 2011, NeuroImage.

[9]  Cones and causal structures on topological and differentiable manifolds , 1999, gr-qc/9905106.

[10]  David A. Boas,et al.  A temporal comparison of BOLD, ASL, and NIRS hemodynamic responses to motor stimuli in adult humans , 2006, NeuroImage.

[11]  Sungho Tak,et al.  Statistical analysis of fNIRS data: A comprehensive review , 2014, NeuroImage.

[12]  S. Fantini,et al.  Comment on the modified Beer-Lambert law for scattering media. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  John M. Lee Introduction to Smooth Manifolds , 2002 .

[14]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  Theory and Methods of Scaling. , 1958 .

[15]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[16]  Arthur W Toga,et al.  Spatiotemporal Evolution of Functional Hemodynamic Changes and Their Relationship to Neuronal Activity , 2005, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[17]  S. Arridge,et al.  Estimation of optical pathlength through tissue from direct time of flight measurement , 1988 .

[18]  Vittorio Murino,et al.  Kernel-Based Analysis of Functional Brain Connectivity on Grassmann Manifold , 2015, MICCAI.

[19]  Bruce J. Biddle,et al.  Causality, confirmation, credulity, and structural equation modeling. , 1987 .

[20]  A. Toga,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Relationships between Neuronal Activity, Oxygen Metabolism, and Hemodynamic Responses , 2004, Neuron.

[21]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis , 2004 .

[22]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Transport on Riemannian Manifold for Connectivity-Based Brain Decoding , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  M. Paradiso,et al.  Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain , 1996 .

[24]  Myung Yung Jeong,et al.  Optimal hemodynamic response model for functional near-infrared spectroscopy , 2015, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[25]  S. Zeki,et al.  Regional changes in cerebral haemodynamics as a result of a visual stimulus measured by near infrared spectroscopy , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. , 2000, Science.

[27]  Leslie Lamport,et al.  Time, clocks, and the ordering of events in a distributed system , 1978, CACM.

[28]  David A Boas,et al.  A haemodynamic response function model in spatio-temporal diffuse optical tomography , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  D. Delpy,et al.  System for long-term measurement of cerebral blood and tissue oxygenation on newborn infants by near infra-red transillumination , 1988, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[30]  A. Villringer,et al.  Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS): A new tool to study hemodynamic changes during activation of brain function in human adults , 1993, Neuroscience Letters.

[31]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Transport on Riemannian Manifold for Functional Connectivity-Based Classification , 2014, MICCAI.

[32]  J. Pearl Causal inference in statistics: An overview , 2009 .

[33]  Ann-Christine Ehlis,et al.  Reconstructing functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) signals impaired by extra-cranial confounds: An easy-to-use filter method , 2014, NeuroImage.

[34]  O. Calvo,et al.  Characterization of the anticipated synchronization regime in the coupled FitzHugh–Nagumo model for neurons , 2003 .

[35]  J. Herrera-Vega,et al.  Image Reconstruction in Functional Optical Neuroimaging The modelling and separation of the scalp blood flow: A research proposal , 2015 .

[36]  Karl J. Friston Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review , 2011, Brain Connect..

[37]  M Kaps,et al.  Neurovascular coupling and cerebral autoregulation can be described in terms of a control system. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[38]  J. Thorpe Elementary Topics in Differential Geometry , 1979 .

[39]  Marco Ferrari,et al.  A brief review on the history of human functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) development and fields of application , 2012, NeuroImage.

[40]  Naoki Tanaka,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of interrelations between spontaneous low-frequency oscillations in cerebral hemodynamics and systemic cardiovascular dynamics , 2006, NeuroImage.

[41]  L. Abbott,et al.  Model neurons: From Hodgkin-Huxley to hopfield , 1990 .

[42]  Barry Horwitz,et al.  The elusive concept of brain connectivity , 2003, NeuroImage.

[43]  A. Darzi,et al.  Quality control and assurance in functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) experimentation , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[44]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy in Novice and Expert Surgeons - A Manifold Embedding Approach , 2007, MICCAI.

[45]  B. O'neill Semi-Riemannian Geometry With Applications to Relativity , 1983 .

[46]  Karl J. Friston Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: A synthesis , 1994 .

[47]  Bülent Sankur,et al.  Constraining the general linear model for sensible hemodynamic response function waveforms , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[48]  S. Sra Positive definite matrices and the Symmetric Stein Divergence , 2011 .

[49]  S. Schultz Principles of Neural Science, 4th ed. , 2001 .

[50]  David Beeman,et al.  Hodgkin-Huxley Model , 2014, Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience.

[51]  Katarzyna J. Blinowska,et al.  A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures , 1991, Biological Cybernetics.

[52]  Shing-Tung Yau Mathematics: Its content, methods, and meaning , 2014 .

[53]  N. Wermuth,et al.  Causality: a Statistical View , 2004 .

[54]  Martin Wolf,et al.  A review on continuous wave functional near-infrared spectroscopy and imaging instrumentation and methodology , 2014, NeuroImage.

[55]  Luiz A. Baccalá,et al.  Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[56]  Vittorio Murino,et al.  Kernel-based classification for brain connectivity graphs on the Riemannian manifold of positive definite matrices , 2015, 2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[57]  Roger Penrose,et al.  On the structure of causal spaces , 1967, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[58]  T. Banchoff,et al.  Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces , 2010 .

[59]  David A. Boas,et al.  Dynamic physiological modeling for functional diffuse optical tomography , 2006, NeuroImage.

[60]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Fast and Simple Calculus on Tensors in the Log-Euclidean Framework , 2005, MICCAI.

[61]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.