Ultrasound-microbubble-mediated drug delivery efficacy and cell viability depend on microbubble radius and ultrasound frequency

We have been investigating ultrasound-mediated drug delivery from microbubbles (MBs) as an alternative therapy to reduce hyper-proliferation of smooth muscle cells. We sought to determine if MB size affects drug delivery, cell viability, or cell adherence. Control, DiI, and drug-incorporated-rapamycin-microbubbles (R-MBs) were size sorted into “small” and “large” sub-populations with number-average mean diameters of 1.7µm and 3.7µm respectively. Drug dose was maintained by keeping the surface area between MB sub-populations constant. Vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) were exposed to size-sorted R-MBs and insonated at 1MHz, 300 kPa, with 50 cycle sinusoids at a PRF of 100Hz for 8s. Insonation with large MBs reduced the proliferation rate of cells by 66.0% vs. 56.1% (n=8, p=0.46) with small MBs. The LIVE/DEAD® Viability/Cytotoxicity assay revealed a significant reduction in live cells (61.% live vs. 77.6% live), n=4, p=0.41), and a greater, but not statistically significant, increase in the permeabilized cells after insonation (1MHz) with large MBs (15.6%) versus small MBs (11.1%). We also investigated the effect of ultrasound frequency (1, 2.25, 5, and 10MHz) on MB on rupture and viability following 20 ultrasound pulses (20 cycle-sinusoids) at a peak negative pressure 600 kPa. 1MHz insonation ruptured the most microbubbles of either size, permeabilized the most cells (50% & 43% for small and large MBs respectively) and killed (33% & 31%) the most cells. More small (d=1.8 µm) MBs were ruptured at every frequency (p<0.001, see Fig. 4). Permeabilization of cells was approximately inversely related to frequency of insonation. 1MHz ultrasound permeabilized the most cells, but also killed the most cells. The permeable/dead cell ratio was 64% for large MBs and 98% for small MBs indicating a better therapeutic ratio when using small MBs.1

[1]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[2]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[3]  Laura Mauri,et al.  2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. , 2011, Circulation.

[4]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Improving Sensitivity in Ultrasound Molecular Imaging by Tailoring Contrast Agent Size Distribution: In Vivo Studies , 2010, Molecular imaging.

[5]  Yao-Sheng Tung,et al.  Microbubble-Size Dependence of Focused Ultrasound-Induced Blood–Brain Barrier Opening in Mice In Vivo , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  J. Ornato,et al.  2009 Focused Updates: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2004 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI Guidelines on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Updating the 2005 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update) , 2009, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[7]  Raffi Karshafian,et al.  Sonoporation by ultrasound-activated microbubble contrast agents: effect of acoustic exposure parameters on cell membrane permeability and cell viability. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  Jameel A Feshitan,et al.  Microbubble size isolation by differential centrifugation. , 2009, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[9]  Aloke V. Finn,et al.  Delayed Arterial Healing and Increased Late Stent Thrombosis at Culprit Sites After Drug-Eluting Stent Placement for Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients: An Autopsy Study , 2008, Circulation.

[10]  J. Hossack,et al.  9B-6 Inhibition of Smooth Muscle Proliferation by Ultrasound-Triggered Release of Rapamycin from Microbubbles , 2007, 2007 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings.

[11]  William Wijns,et al.  Stent thrombosis late after implantation of first-generation drug-eluting stents: a cause for concern. , 2007, Circulation.

[12]  Mark Borden,et al.  Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[13]  R. Henning,et al.  Optimization of ultrasound and microbubbles targeted gene delivery to cultured primary endothelial cells , 2007, Journal of drug targeting.

[14]  Jeffrey C Bamber,et al.  Physical parameters affecting ultrasound/microbubble-mediated gene delivery efficiency in vitro. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  G. Owens,et al.  Molecular regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation in development and disease. , 2004, Physiological reviews.

[16]  O. A. Asbjornsen,et al.  Size fractionation of gas-filled microspheres by flotation , 1996 .

[17]  William Wijns,et al.  A Cause for Concern , 2007 .