The Discipline's Community: The Effects of Method and Market on Research Relevance

[1]  T. Luke.  The discipline as disciplinary normalization: Networks of research∗ , 1999 .

[2]  J. Gunnell.  The Descent of Political Theory: The Genealogy of an American Vocation , 1993 .

[3]  David M. Ricci.  The Tragedy of Political Science: Politics, Scholarship, and Democracy , 1985 .

[4]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Science and critique in political discourse: Elements of a postpositivistic methodology. , 1982 .

[5]  L. Laudan,et al.  Progress and its problems: Toward a theory of scientific growth , 1978 .

[6]  J. Tanenhaus,et al.  The development of American political science : from Burgess to behavioralism , 1967 .

[7]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .

[8]  T. Duvall.  Becoming comfortable on unsteady ground: Knowledge, perspective, and the science of politics , 1997 .

[9]  D. Easton,et al.  Regime and discipline : democracy and the development of political science , 1995 .

[10]  James Farr,et al.  Discipline and history : political science in the United States , 1993 .

[11]  David M. Ricci.  The tragedy of political science , 1984 .

[12]  R. Bernstein.  Beyond objectivism and relativism , 1983 .

[13]  H. Blalock.  Conceptualization and Measurement in the Social Sciences , 1982 .

[14]  H. Feigl.  The Origin and Spirit of Logical Positivism , 1981 .

[15]  I. Lakatos.  Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1976 .

[16]  G. Carey,et al.  The post-behavioral era : perspectives on political science , 1972 .

[17]  David Bicknell Truman,et al.  The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion , 1951 .

[18]  H. Lasswell.  Propaganda technique in the world war , 1938 .

[19]  James N. Rosenau,et al.  Scientific Study of Foreign Policy , 1938, Nature.

[20]  C. E. Merriam.  Civic education in the United States , 1934 .

[21]  David Easton.  The New Revolution in Political Science , 1969, American Political Science Review.