Evaluation of impaired fingertip texture discrimination and wrist position sense in patients affected by stroke: comparison of clinical and new quantitative measures.

Discriminative sensory loss is common following stroke but may not be adequately detected by routine clinical measures. Quantitative tests of texture discrimination and limb position sense have been recently developed. These tests provide reliable estimates of discrimination, differentiate impaired performance following stroke, and have standardized criteria of abnormality. The purpose of this study was to compare predictions of impairment based on current clinical measures with predictions based on these quantitative, standardized measures. Thirty-five patients who had strokes were tested on the new quantitative measures and clinical measures of texture discrimination and limb position sense. The findings indicated poor agreement between impairment defined using current clinical measures and statistically abnormal performance on the new quantitative, norm-referenced measures. The findings suggest that the quantitative tests may provide additional assessment information to supplement that of the existing clinical measures of texture discrimination and limb position sense. Further development of these new quantitative measures is indicated.

[1]  G. Holmes,et al.  Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions , 1911 .

[2]  T. Treasure,et al.  CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE Sensory consequences of stroke , 1993, The Lancet.

[3]  A. Anastasi.  Psychological testing, 6th ed. , 1988 .

[4]  H Burton,et al.  Functional MRI in human somatosensory cortex activated by touching textured surfaces , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  E. Renzi,et al.  Hemispheric contribution to exploration of space through the visual and tactile modality. , 1970, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[6]  R G Smith,et al.  Observer variation in the clinical assessment of stroke. , 1976, Age and ageing.

[7]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Right cerebral dominance in spatial attention. Further evidence based on ipsilateral neglect. , 1987, Archives of neurology.

[8]  Nadina B. Lincoln,et al.  Reliability and Revision of the Nottingham Sensory Assessment for Stroke Patients , 1998 .

[9]  H Burton,et al.  Multiple foci in parietal and frontal cortex activated by rubbing embossed grating patterns across fingerpads: a positron emission tomography study in humans. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  F. Tomasello,et al.  Assessment of inter‐observer differences in the Italian multicenter study on reversible cerebral ischemia. , 1982, Stroke.

[11]  I. Darian‐Smith,et al.  Peripheral neural representation of the spatial frequency of a grating moving across the monkey's finger pad. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  Human tactile pattern recognition: active versus passive touch, velocity effects, and patterns of confusion. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Richard D. Jones,et al.  Impairment and recovery of ipsilateral sensory-motor function following unilateral cerebral infarction. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  T. Munsat.  Quantification of neurologic deficit , 1989 .

[15]  Neurological examination in clinical practice , 1968 .

[16]  Leeanne M. Carey,et al.  Somatosensory Loss after Stroke , 1995 .

[17]  J S Kim,et al.  Discriminative sensory dysfunction after unilateral stroke. , 1996, Stroke.

[18]  Nadina B. Lincoln,et al.  The unreliability of sensory assessments , 1991 .

[19]  L. Carey,et al.  Impaired limb position sense after stroke: a quantitative test for clinical use. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  Don McNicol,et al.  A Primer of Signal Detection Theory , 1976 .

[21]  D. Burke,et al.  Does the nervous system depend on kinesthetic information to control natural limb movements , 1992 .

[22]  L. Carey,et al.  Sensory loss in stroke patients: effective training of tactile and proprioceptive discrimination. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  D. Wade,et al.  Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. , 1992, Current opinion in neurology and neurosurgery.

[24]  W. Schiff,et al.  Tactual Perception: A Source Book , 1983 .

[25]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Tactile discrimination of gratings , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  C. Anderson,et al.  Patterns of Acute Hospital Care, Rehabilitation, and Discharge Disposition after Acute Stroke: The Perth Community Stroke Study 1989–1990 , 1994 .

[27]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[28]  J. Guilford.  Psychometric methods, 2nd ed. , 1954 .

[29]  T. Schenkenberg,et al.  Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment , 1980, Neurology.

[30]  P. Halligan,et al.  Current practice and clinical relevance of somatosensory assessment after stroke , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[31]  C Bassetti,et al.  Sensory syndromes in parietal stroke , 1993, Neurology.

[32]  R. Prescott,et al.  Predicting functional outcome following acute stroke using a standard clinical examination. , 1982, Stroke.

[33]  K. Hayes.  The effect of awareness of measurement error on physical therapists' confidence in their decisions. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[34]  Leeanne M. Carey,et al.  Impaired Touch Discrimination After Stroke: A Quantiative Test , 1997 .