Micromechanics of the fibrosa and the ventricularis in aortic valve leaflets.

The elastic response of aortic valve cusps is a summation of its fibrous components. To investigate the micromechanical function of valve leaflet constituents, we separated the fibrosa and the ventricularis from fresh and glutaraldehyde-fixed leaflets and tested them individually. The ventricularis was stiffer circumferentially than radially (7.41 kPa vs 3.68 kPa, p less than 0.00001) and was more extensible radially (62.7% vs 21.8% strain to high modulus phase, p less than 0.00001). The fibrosa was also stiffer circumferentially than radially (13.02 kPa vs 4.65 kPa, p less than 0.0008), but had uniform extensibility. Glutaraldehyde fixation did not affect the circumferential elastic modulus of the fibrosa, but reduced its radial modulus from 4.65 kPa to 2.32 kPa (p less than 0.0078). The elastic modulus of the ventricularis remained unchanged. Fixation also reduced the extensibility of the ventricularis circumferentially (from 21.8% to 15.2% strain, p less than 0.018), but not radially, and increased the radial extensibility of the fibrosa from 27.7% to 46.1% (p less than 0.0048). These data show that while the ventricularis contains a large amount of elastin, the amount of radially oriented collagen is similar to that of the fibrosa. The fibrosa, by itself, has the same extensibility in both directions (about 23% strain), but can extend much more radially when connected to the rest of the leaflet because it is attached to the ventricularis in a highly folded configuration. The two layers therefore complement each other during aortic valve function, and become detrimentally altered by fixation in glutaraldehyde.

[1]  B H Smaill,et al.  An assessment of the mechanical properties of leaflets from four second-generation porcine bioprostheses with biaxial testing techniques. , 1989, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  D R Boughner,et al.  The glutaraldehyde-stabilized porcine aortic valve xenograft. I. Tensile viscoelastic properties of the fresh leaflet material. , 1984, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  A A Sauren,et al.  Elastic and viscoelastic material behaviour of fresh and glutaraldehyde-treated porcine aortic valve tissue. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  A. Mazzucco,et al.  Early mechanical failures of the Hancock pericardial xenograft. , 1987, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  N. Broom,et al.  Fatigue-induced damage in glutaraldehyde-preserved heart valve tissue. , 1978, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[6]  A A Sauren,et al.  The mechanical properties of porcine aortic valve tissues. , 1983, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  G Thiene,et al.  Results of reoperation for primary tissue failure of porcine bioprostheses. , 1985, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  I. Vesely,et al.  Mechanical testing of cryopreserved aortic allografts. Comparison with xenografts and fresh tissue. , 1990, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[9]  M. Thubrikar,et al.  Patterns of calcific deposits in operatively excised stenotic or purely regurgitant aortic valves and their relation to mechanical stress. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  F. Nistal,et al.  Comparative study of primary tissue failure between porcine (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) and bovine pericardial (Ionescu-Shiley) bioprostheses in the aortic position at five- to nine-year follow-up. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  J. Mercer,et al.  The geometry and construction of the aortic leaflet. , 1973, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[12]  P D Stein,et al.  Relation of calcification to torn leaflets of spontaneously degenerated porcine bioprosthetic valves. , 1985, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  E. Arbustini,et al.  Calcific degeneration as the main cause of porcine bioprosthetic valve failure. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  H. Rakowski,et al.  Survival and bioprosthetic valve failure. Ten-year follow-up. , 1989, Circulation.

[15]  I. Vesely,et al.  Effects of dynamic fixation on shear behaviour of porcine xenograft valves. , 1990, Biomaterials.

[16]  R. E. Clark,et al.  Scanning and light microscopy of human aortic leaflets in stressed and relaxed states. , 1974, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  D R Boughner,et al.  The glutaraldehyde-stabilized porcine aortic valve xenograft. II. Effect of fixation with or without pressure on the tensile viscoelastic properties of the leaflet material. , 1984, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[18]  S. Gabbay,et al.  Do heart valve bioprostheses degenerate for metabolic or mechanical reasons? , 1988, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[19]  E A Trowbridge,et al.  Pericardial heterograft valves: an assessment of leaflet stresses and their implications for heart valve design. , 1987, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[20]  F. Nistal,et al.  Six- to ten-year follow-up of patients with the Hancock cardiac bioprosthesis. Incidence of primary tissue valve failure. , 1986, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[21]  M Jones,et al.  Structure and classification of cuspal tears and perforations in porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves implanted in patients. , 1981, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  F. Schoen Cardiac valve prostheses: review of clinical status and contemporary biomaterials issues. , 1987, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[23]  B. Chaitman,et al.  Late tears in leaflets of porcine bioprostheses in adults. , 1984, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[24]  I Vesely,et al.  Tissue buckling as a mechanism of bioprosthetic valve failure. , 1988, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[25]  I Vesely,et al.  Analysis of the bending behaviour of porcine xenograft leaflets and of natural aortic valve material: bending stiffness, neutral axis and shear measurements. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  L N Scotten,et al.  New generation tissue valves. Their in vitro function in the mitral position. , 1984, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[27]  F. J. Thomson,et al.  Influence of fixation conditions on the performance of glutaraldehyde-treated porcine aortic valves: towards a more scientific basis. , 1979, Thorax.

[28]  L Gross,et al.  Topographic Anatomy and Histology of the Valves in the Human Heart. , 1931, The American journal of pathology.

[29]  G. Stellin,et al.  Performance of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis following aortic valve replacement: considerations based on a 15-year experience. , 1988, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[30]  Y. Fung,et al.  The retained elasticity of elastin under fixation agents. , 1981, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[31]  W. M. Swanson,et al.  Dimensions and Geometric Relationships of the Human Aortic Value as a Function of Pressure , 1974, Circulation research.

[32]  M. R. Roach,et al.  Arterial elastin as seen with scanning electron microscopy: a review. , 1988, Scanning microscopy.

[33]  I. Vesely Analysis of the Medtronic Intact bioprosthetic valve. Effects of "zero-pressure" fixation. , 1991, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[34]  G F Tyers,et al.  The Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis. A first-generation tissue valve with excellent long-term clinical performance. , 1990, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[35]  E. Trowbridge,et al.  The standardisation of gauge length: its influence on the relative extensibility of natural and chemically modified pericardium. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  Effect of glutaraldehyde fixation and valve constraint conditions on porcine aortic valve leaflet coaptation. , 1982, Thorax.

[37]  E. Peterson,et al.  The porcine bioprosthetic valve. Twelve years later. , 1985, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.