Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs

Animals that forage socially often stand to gain from coordination of their behaviour. Yet it is not known how group members reach a consensus on the timing of foraging bouts. Here we demonstrate a simple process by which this may occur. We develop a state-dependent, dynamic game model of foraging by a pair of animals, in which each individual chooses between resting or foraging during a series of consecutive periods, so as to maximize its own individual chances of survival. We find that, if there is an advantage to foraging together, the equilibrium behaviour of both individuals becomes highly synchronized. As a result of this synchronization, differences in the energetic reserves of the two players spontaneously develop, leading them to adopt different behavioural roles. The individual with lower reserves emerges as the ‘pace-maker’ who determines when the pair should forage, providing a straightforward resolution to the problem of group coordination. Moreover, the strategy that gives rise to this behaviour can be implemented by a simple ‘rule of thumb’ that requires no detailed knowledge of the state of other individuals.

[1]  R. Lewontin The Interaction of Selection and Linkage. I. General Considerations; Heterotic Models. , 1964, Genetics.

[2]  W. Hamilton Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  Earl Hunt,et al.  REVIEW AND PROSPECTUS , 1975 .

[4]  O. Leimar,et al.  Evolution of Fighting Behaviour: Decision Rules and Assessment of Relative Strength , 1983 .

[5]  C. Barnard Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 2nd edition, J.R. Krebs, N.B. Davies (Eds.). Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford (1984), xi , 1985 .

[6]  S. L. Lima PREDATION RISK AND UNPREDICTABLE FEEDING CONDITIONS: DETERMINANTS OF BODY MASS IN BIRDS' , 1986 .

[7]  C. Clark The lazy, adaptable lions: a Markovian model of group foraging , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  Marc Mangel,et al.  Dynamic models in behavioural and evolutionary ecology , 1988, Nature.

[9]  C. Clark,et al.  Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral Ecology , 2019 .

[10]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[11]  A. Houston,et al.  The value of fat reserves and the tradeoff between starvation and predation , 1990, Acta biotheoretica.

[12]  M. Mangel Resource divisibility, predation and group formation , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  A. J. Rook,et al.  Synchronisation of eating, ruminating and idling activity by grazing sheep , 1991 .

[14]  C. Clark,et al.  DOMINANT AND SUBORDINATE FATTENING STRATEGIES - A DYNAMIC GAME , 1995 .

[15]  E. J. Collins,et al.  A general technique for computing evolutionarily stable strategies based on errors in decision-making. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  P A Bednekoff,et al.  Mutualism Among Safe, Selfish Sentinels: A Dynamic Game , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[17]  S. L. Lima Stress and Decision Making under the Risk of Predation: Recent Developments from Behavioral, Reproductive, and Ecological Perspectives , 1998 .

[18]  L. Conradt,et al.  Could asynchrony in activity between the sexes cause intersexual social segregation in ruminants? , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Paul Reeves,et al.  Positioning Behaviour in Roach Shoals: The Role of Body Length and Nutritional State , 1998 .

[20]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Models of Adaptive Behaviour: An Approach Based on State , 1999 .

[21]  T. Caraco,et al.  Social Foraging Theory , 2018 .

[22]  Raymond J. O'Connor,et al.  Models of Adaptive Behaviour: An Approach Based on State. , 2001 .

[23]  R. R. Krausz Living in Groups , 2013 .

[24]  S. Richards Temporal partitioning and aggression among foragers: modeling the effects of stochasticity and individual state , 2002 .

[25]  K. Ruckstuhl,et al.  Sexual segregation in ungulates: a comparative test of three hypotheses , 2002, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[26]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Self-Organization in Biological Systems , 2001, Princeton studies in complexity.

[27]  T. J. Roper,et al.  Group decision-making in animals , 2003, Nature.

[28]  Jens Krause,et al.  The relationship between foraging and shoal position in a mixed shoal of roach (Rutilus rutilus) and chub (Leuciscus cephalus): a field study , 1993, Oecologia.

[29]  J. Krause,et al.  Relationship between the position preference and nutritional state of individuals in schools of juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus) , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[30]  J. Godin,et al.  Foraging under the risk of predation in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) : effects of social status and hunger , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[31]  A. Houston,et al.  Flocking behaviour of passerines: a dynamic model for the non-reproductive season , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.