DNA Specificity Determinants Associate with Distinct Transcription Factor Functions

To elucidate how genomic sequences build transcriptional control networks, we need to understand the connection between DNA sequence and transcription factor binding and function. Binding predictions based solely on consensus predictions are limited, because a single factor can use degenerate sequence motifs and because related transcription factors often prefer identical sequences. The ETS family transcription factor, ETS1, exemplifies these challenges. Unexpected, redundant occupancy of ETS1 and other ETS proteins is observed at promoters of housekeeping genes in T cells due to common sequence preferences and the presence of strong consensus motifs. However, ETS1 exhibits a specific function in T cell activation; thus, unique transcriptional targets are predicted. To uncover the sequence motifs that mediate specific functions of ETS1, a genome-wide approach, chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq), identified both promoter and enhancer binding events in Jurkat T cells. A comparison with DNase I sensitivity both validated the dataset and also improved accuracy. Redundant occupancy of ETS1 with the ETS protein GABPA occurred primarily in promoters of housekeeping genes, whereas ETS1 specific occupancy occurred in the enhancers of T cell–specific genes. Two routes to ETS1 specificity were identified: an intrinsic preference of ETS1 for a variant of the ETS family consensus sequence and the presence of a composite sequence that can support cooperative binding with a RUNX transcription factor. Genome-wide occupancy of RUNX factors corroborated the importance of this partnership. Furthermore, genome-wide occupancy of co-activator CBP indicated tight co-localization with ETS1 at specific enhancers, but not redundant promoters. The distinct sequences associated with redundant versus specific ETS1 occupancy were predictive of promoter or enhancer location and the ontology of nearby genes. These findings demonstrate that diversity of DNA binding motifs may enable variable transcription factor function at different genomic sites.

[1]  David A. Nix,et al.  Empirical methods for controlling false positives and estimating confidence in ChIP-Seq peaks , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[2]  S. Weitzman,et al.  p300/cAMP-responsive Element-binding Protein Interactions with Ets-1 and Ets-2 in the Transcriptional Activation of the Human Stromelysin Promoter* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  A. Sharrocks The ETS-domain transcription factor family , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[4]  Gary D. Stormo,et al.  Identifying DNA and protein patterns with statistically significant alignments of multiple sequences , 1999, Bioinform..

[5]  K. Takeda,et al.  Runx proteins are involved in regulation of CD122, Ly49 family and IFN-gamma expression during NK cell differentiation. , 2008, International immunology.

[6]  C. Hauser,et al.  Changes in the Expression of Many Ets Family Transcription Factors and of Potential Target Genes in Normal Mammary Tissue and Tumors* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells , 2008, Nature.

[8]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  One nucleotide in a kappaB site can determine cofactor specificity for NF-kappaB dimers. , 2004, Cell.

[9]  M. Carey,et al.  A mechanism for coordinating chromatin modification and preinitiation complex assembly. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[10]  W. Hahn,et al.  Telomerase Maintains Telomere Structure in Normal Human Cells , 2003, Cell.

[11]  Charles Elkan,et al.  Fitting a Mixture Model By Expectation Maximization To Discover Motifs In Biopolymer , 1994, ISMB.

[12]  Peter C. Hollenhorst,et al.  Genome-wide analyses reveal properties of redundant and specific promoter occupancy within the ETS gene family. , 2007, Genes & development.

[13]  May D. Wang,et al.  GoMiner: a resource for biological interpretation of genomic and proteomic data , 2003, Genome Biology.

[14]  Kimberly Glass,et al.  All and only CpG containing sequences are enriched in promoters abundantly bound by RNA polymerase II in multiple tissues , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[15]  Dustin E. Schones,et al.  High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome , 2007, Cell.

[16]  A. Rosmarin,et al.  GA-Binding Protein and p300 Are Essential Components of a Retinoic Acid-Induced Enhanceosome in Myeloid Cells , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[17]  A. Visel,et al.  Combinatorial Regulation of Endothelial Gene Expression by Ets and Forkhead Transcription Factors , 2008, Cell.

[18]  Anthony P. Fejes,et al.  Genome-wide relationship between histone H3 lysine 4 mono- and tri-methylation and transcription factor binding. , 2008, Genome research.

[19]  Cizhong Jiang,et al.  Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation: advances through genomics , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[20]  R Grosschedl,et al.  Assembly and function of a TCR alpha enhancer complex is dependent on LEF-1-induced DNA bending and multiple protein-protein interactions. , 1995, Genes & development.

[21]  C. Y. Wang,et al.  Activation of the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor promoter in T cells requires cooperative binding of Elf-1 and AP-1 transcription factors , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[22]  N Muthusamy,et al.  The Ets-1 transcription factor is required for the development of natural killer cells in mice. , 1998, Immunity.

[23]  N. Speck,et al.  Transactivation of the Moloney murine leukemia virus and T-cell receptor beta-chain enhancers by cbf and ets requires intact binding sites for both proteins , 1995, Journal of virology.

[24]  B. Teferedegne,et al.  Mechanism of action of a distal NF-kappaB-dependent enhancer. , 2006, Molecular and cellular biology.

[25]  David Baltimore,et al.  One Nucleotide in a κB Site Can Determine Cofactor Specificity for NF-κB Dimers , 2004, Cell.

[26]  T. Gu,et al.  Auto-Inhibition of Ets-1 Is Counteracted by DNA Binding Cooperativity with Core-Binding Factor α2 , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[27]  C. Foulds,et al.  Ras/Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Activates Ets-1 and Ets-2 by CBP/p300 Recruitment , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[28]  S. Batzoglou,et al.  Genome-Wide Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding Sites Based on ChIP-Seq Data , 2008, Nature Methods.

[29]  N. Speck,et al.  Cooperative binding of Ets-1 and core binding factor to DNA , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[30]  M. Ohki,et al.  Interaction and functional cooperation of the leukemia‐associated factors AML1 and p300 in myeloid cell differentiation , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[31]  Peter C. Hollenhorst,et al.  Expression profiles frame the promoter specificity dilemma of the ETS family of transcription factors. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[32]  S. Arber,et al.  ERM is required for transcriptional control of the spermatogonial stem cell niche , 2005, Nature.

[33]  Nathaniel D. Heintzman,et al.  Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[34]  S. Mango,et al.  Regulation of Organogenesis by the Caenorhabditis elegans FoxA Protein PHA-4 , 2002, Science.

[35]  A. Visel,et al.  ChIP-seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers , 2009, Nature.

[36]  Toshiyuki Yamada,et al.  Molecular biology of the Ets family of transcription factors. , 2003, Gene.

[37]  Dustin E. Schones,et al.  Genome-wide Mapping of HATs and HDACs Reveals Distinct Functions in Active and Inactive Genes , 2009, Cell.

[38]  B. Teferedegne,et al.  Mechanism of Action of a Distal NF-κB-Dependent Enhancer , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[39]  Hongkai Ji,et al.  A comparative analysis of genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation data for mammalian transcription factors , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[40]  Z. Weng,et al.  High-Resolution Mapping and Characterization of Open Chromatin across the Genome , 2008, Cell.

[41]  C. Massie,et al.  ChIPping away at gene regulation , 2008, EMBO reports.

[42]  K. Gaston,et al.  CpG methylation has differential effects on the binding of YY1 and ETS proteins to the bi-directional promoter of the Surf-1 and Surf-2 genes. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[43]  J. Ghysdael,et al.  A single amino-acid substitution in the Ets domain alters core DNA binding specificity of Ets1 to that of the related transcription factors Elf1 and E74. , 1993, Nucleic acids research.

[44]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Chromatin decouples promoter threshold from dynamic range , 2008, Nature.

[45]  K. Yamamoto,et al.  DNA Binding Site Sequence Directs Glucocorticoid Receptor Structure and Activity , 2009, Science.

[46]  M. Rivera,et al.  A Role for CREB Binding Protein and p300 Transcriptional Coactivators in Ets-1 Transactivation Functions , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[47]  N. Speck,et al.  Core binding factors are necessary for natural killer cell development and cooperate with Notch signaling during T-cell specification. , 2008, Blood.

[48]  R. Kobayashi,et al.  A DNA methylation site in the male-specific P450 (Cyp 2d-9) promoter and binding of the heteromeric transcription factor GABP , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[49]  L. Hennighausen,et al.  Genetic evidence supporting selection of the Valpha14i NKT cell lineage from double-positive thymocyte precursors. , 2005, Immunity.

[50]  Victor X Jin,et al.  E2F in vivo binding specificity: comparison of consensus versus nonconsensus binding sites. , 2008, Genome research.

[51]  F. Alt,et al.  Increased T-cell apoptosis and terminal B-cell differentiation induced by inactivation of the Ets-1 proto-oncogene , 1995, Nature.

[52]  A. Bird DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. , 2002, Genes & development.

[53]  N. Muthusamy,et al.  Defective activation and survival of T cells lacking the Ets-1 transcription factor , 1995, Nature.

[54]  A. Orth,et al.  Large-scale analysis of the human and mouse transcriptomes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.