The influence of density differences on the mixing of the primary loop inventory and the emergency core cooling (ECC) water in the cold leg and downcomer of a pressurized water reactor (PWR) was analyzed at the Rossendorf coolant mixing (ROCOM) test facility. This paper presents a matrix of ROCOM experiments in which water with the same or higher density was injected into a cold leg of the reactor model with already established natural circulation conditions at different low mass flow rates. Wire-mesh sensors measuring the concentration of a tracer in the injected water were installed in the cold leg, upper and lower part of the downcomer. A transition matrix from momentum to buoyancy-driven flow experiments was selected for validation of the computational fluid dynamics software ANSYS CFX. A hybrid mesh with 4×10 6 elements was used for the calculations. The turbulence models usually applied in such cases assume that turbulence is isotropic, whilst buoyancy actually induces anisotropy. Thus, in this paper, higher order turbulence models have been developed and implemented, which take into account that anisotropy. Buoyancy generated source and dissipation terms were proposed and introduced into the balance equations for the turbulent kinetic energy. The results of the experiments and of the numerical calculations show that mixing strongly depends on buoyancy effects: At higher mass flow rates (close to nominal conditions) the injected slug propagates in the circumferential direction around the core barrel. Buoyancy effects reduce this circumferential propagation with lower mass flow rates and/or higher density differences. The ECC water falls in an almost vertical path and reaches the lower downcomer sensor directly below the inlet nozzle. Therefore, density effects play an important role during natural convection with the ECC injection in PWR and should be also considered in pressurized thermal shock scenarios. ANSYS CFX was able to predict the observed flow patterns and mixing phenomena quite well.
[1]
Frank-Peter Weiss,et al.
Coolant Mixing in a Pressurized Water Reactor: Deboration Transients, Steam-Line Breaks, and Emergency Core Cooling Injection
,
2003
.
[2]
W. Kastner,et al.
Thermal hydraulics of PWRS with respect to boron dilution phenomena. Experimental results from the test facilities PKL and UPTF
,
2001
.
[3]
Horst-Michael Prasser,et al.
Fast wire-mesh sensors for gas-liquid flows - Visualisation with up to 10 000 frames per second
,
2002
.
[4]
Soeren Kliem,et al.
Fluid mixing and flow distribution in the reactor circuit, measurement data base
,
2005
.
[5]
H. Prasser,et al.
A new electrode-mesh tomograph for gas–liquid flows
,
1998
.
[6]
Ulrich Bieder,et al.
Simulation of mixing effects in a VVER-1000 reactor
,
2007
.
[7]
Thomas Höhne,et al.
CFD Simulation of Thermal-Hydraulic Benchmark V1000CT-2 Using ANSYS CFX
,
2009
.
[8]
Florian R. Menter,et al.
CFD Best Practice Guidelines for CFD Code Validation for Reactor- Safety Applications
,
2002
.
[9]
Soeren Kliem,et al.
Fluid mixing and flow distribution in a primary circuit of a nuclear pressurized water reactor—Validation of CFD codes
,
2007
.
[10]
Soeren Kliem,et al.
Hydrodynamic phenomena in the downcomer during flow rate transients in the primary circuit of a PWR
,
2007
.
[11]
Thomas Höhne,et al.
Modeling of a buoyancy-driven flow experiment at the ROCOM test facility using the CFD codes CFX-5 and Trio_U
,
2006
.
[12]
Francesco Saverio D'Auria,et al.
CFX Simulations of ROCOM Slug Mixing Experiments
,
2007
.