Impact of Imprint Cytology in Detecting Short Segment Barrett's Esophagus

Background Short-segment Barrett's esophagus (SSBE) is defined by the presence of columnar-appearing mucosa in distal esophagus (involving less than 2 to 3 cm), with intestinal metaplasia on biopsy. Its potential to develop dysplasia and cancer may require a surveillance program with better diagnostic tools to detect intestinal metaplasia. Goals To investigate the role of imprint cytology as a diagnostic tool either alone or combined with histology in SSBE. Study Seventy-nine patients (46 men, 33 women) with SSBE diagnosed during elective upper gastroscopy were included. Patients with serrated z-line with short tongues of pink mucosa and patients with a circular nonserrated z-line that extended less than 2 cm above the esophagogastric junction were biopsied on four quadrants just distal to z-line. Four slides of imprint preparation (including 1, 2, 3, and 4 touching of each biopsy specimen) was made for cytologic examination. Hematoxylin and eosin and Alcian blue staining for histologic examinations and Alcian Blue for cytologic evaluations were used to find evidence of intestinal metaplasia. Results Intestinal metaplasia was detected in 15 (19%), 21 (27%), and 30 (38%) patients by histologic examination with hematoxylin and eosin alone, by Alcian blue alone, and by histologic plus cytologic examination with Alcian blue, respectively. Nine patients with negative histologic but positive cytologic results were positive for intestinal metaplasia when they were reevaluated after further sectioning and staining. Sensitivity of imprint cytology alone was 53%. When imprint cytology was combined with the histologic evaluation, the prevalence of intestinal metaplasia increased from 27% to 38% (p < 0.05). Conclusion Imprint cytology might be a complementary diagnostic tool for histology in detecting patients with SSBE.

[1]  P. Sharma,et al.  Short segment Barrett esophagus and specialized columnar mucosa at the gastroesophageal junction. , 2001, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[2]  L. Burgart,et al.  Endoscopic and histologic diagnosis of Barrett esophagus. , 2001, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[3]  R. Wong,et al.  Specialized intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, and cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: prevalence and clinical data. , 1999, Gastroenterology.

[4]  C. Kapadia Short-segment Barrett's esophagus: prevalence, diagnosis, and associations. , 1998, Gastroenterology.

[5]  A. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Dysplasia in short-segment Barrett's esophagus: a prospective 3-year follow-up. , 1997, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[6]  D. Antonioli,et al.  Morphology of Barrett's esophagus and Barrett's-associated dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. , 1997, Gastroenterology clinics of North America.

[7]  S. Spechler The columnar-lined esophagus. History, terminology, and clinical issues. , 1997, Gastroenterology clinics of North America.

[8]  N. Talley,et al.  Short segment Barrett's oesophagus: prevalence, diagnosis and associations. , 1997, Gut.

[9]  J. Hunter,et al.  Significance of Intestinal Metaplasia in Different Areas of Esophagus Including Esophagogastric Junction , 1997, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[10]  R. Goyal,et al.  Value of cytology in detecting intestinal metaplasia and associated dysplasia at the gastroesophageal junction. , 1997, Human pathology.

[11]  R. Cherian,et al.  Prospective long-term endoscopic and histological follow-up of short segment Barrett's esophagus: comparison with traditional long segment Barrett's esophagus. , 1997, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[12]  M. Johnston,et al.  The prevalence and clinical characteristics of short segments of specialized intestinal metaplasia in the distal esophagus on routine endoscopy. , 1996, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[13]  R. Cherian,et al.  Short segment Barrett's esophagus: clinical and histological features, associated endoscopic findings, and association with gastric intestinal metaplasia. , 1996, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[14]  A. Cameron,et al.  Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and Barrett's esophagus. , 1995, Gastroenterology.

[15]  K. Geisinger Endoscopic biopsies and cytologic brushings of the esophagus are diagnostically complementary. , 1995, American journal of clinical pathology.

[16]  R. Goyal,et al.  Prevalence of metaplasia at the gastro-oesophageal junction , 1994, The Lancet.

[17]  R. Haggitt,et al.  Barrett's esophagus, dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma. , 1994, Human pathology.

[18]  S. McClave,et al.  Incomplete intestinal metaplasia in the diagnosis of columnar lined esophagus (Barrett's esophagus). , 1989, American Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[19]  R. R. Smith,et al.  Prevalence and characteristics of Barrett esophagus in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction. , 1988, Human pathology.

[20]  S. Hamilton,et al.  Diagnostic value of cytopathology in Barrett esophagus and associated carcinoma. , 1988, American journal of clinical pathology.

[21]  Lee Tk The value of imprint cytology in tumor diagnosis: a retrospective study of 522 cases in northern China. , 1982 .

[22]  H. Spiro,et al.  The nature and location of lower esophageal ring. , 1971, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  P. Dítě,et al.  [Barrett's esophagus]. , 2000, Bratislavske lekarske listy.

[24]  H. Zwick,et al.  Diagnostic sensitivity of different techniques in the diagnosis of lung tumors with the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope. Comparison of brush biopsy, imprint cytology of forceps biopsy, and histology of forceps biopsy , 1991, Cancer.

[25]  T. Lee,et al.  The value of imprint cytology in tumor diagnosis: a retrospective study of 522 cases in northern China. , 1982, Acta cytologica.