Mate choice and optimal search behavior: fitness returns under the fixed sample and sequential search strategies.

The behavior of a female in search of a mate determines the likelihood that she encounters a high-quality male in the search process. The fixed sample (best-of-n) search strategy and the sequential search (fixed threshold) strategy are two prominent models of search behavior. The sequential search strategy dominates the former strategy--yields an equal or higher expected net fitness return to searchers--when search costs are nontrivial and the distribution of quality among prospective mates is uniform or truncated normal. In this paper our objective is to determine whether there are any search costs or distributions of male quality for which the sequential search strategy is inferior to the fixed sample search strategy. The two search strategies are derived under general conditions in which females evaluate encountered males by inspection of an indicator character that has some functional relationship to male quality. The solutions are identical to the original models when the inspected male attribute is itself male quality. The sequential search strategy is shown to dominate the fixed sample search strategy for all search costs and distributions of male quality. Low search costs have been implicated to explain empirical observations that are consistent with the use of a fixed sample search strategy, but under conditions in which the original models were derived there is no search cost or distribution of male quality that favors the fixed sample search strategy. Plausible alternative explanations for the apparent use of this search strategy are discussed.

[1]  L. Real,et al.  Sequential search and the influence of male quality on female mating decisions , 1999, Journal of mathematical biology.

[2]  L. Real,et al.  Some Distinguishing Features of Models of Search Behavior and Mate Choice , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[3]  A. Janetos Strategies of female mate choice: A theoretical analysis , 1980, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[4]  Leslie A. Real,et al.  Search Theory and Mate Choice. II. Mutual Interaction, Assortative Mating, and Equilibrium Variation in Male and Female Fitness , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[5]  William E. Wagner,et al.  Experience Affects Female Responses to Male Song in the Variable Field Cricket Gryllus lineaticeps (Orthoptera, Gryllidae) , 2001 .

[6]  Barney Luttbeg,et al.  Assessing the robustness and optimality of alternative decision rules with varying assumptions , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  Barney Luttbeg,et al.  A Comparative Bayes tactic for mate assessment and choice , 1996 .

[8]  M. Itzkowitz,et al.  Mate inspection patterns in the female beaugregory damselfish (Stegastes leucostictus) , 2008, acta ethologica.

[9]  A. Wallace Darwinism : an exposition of the theory of natural selection, with some of its applications / by Alfred Russel Wallace. , 1889 .

[10]  Daniel D Wiegmann,et al.  Mate choice and uncertainty in the decision process. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  M. Milinski,et al.  Costs influences sequential mate choice in sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  R. Feinberg,et al.  The Superiority of Sequential Search: A Calculation , 1977 .

[13]  M. Petrie,et al.  VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[14]  A. Wallace Contributions to the Theory of Natural Selection , 2009 .

[15]  R. Gibson,et al.  How do animals choose their mates? , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  Jerald B. Johnson,et al.  Predator exposure alters female mate choice in the green swordtail , 2003 .

[17]  L. Real Search Theory and Mate Choice. I. Models of Single-Sex Discrimination , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[18]  The empirical question of thresholds and mechanisms of mate choice , 1996, Evolutionary Ecology.

[19]  John J. McCall,et al.  The Economics of Search , 2007 .

[20]  M. Wilson The ant and the peacock: altruism and sexual selection from darwin to today , 1992 .

[21]  G. Rosenqvist,et al.  Prior exposure to male phenotypes influences mate choice in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata , 1997 .

[22]  P. Backwell,et al.  Density affects female and male mate searching in the fiddler crab, Uca beebei , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[23]  J. Byers,et al.  A Dry Summer Diminishes Mate Search Effort by Pronghorn Females: Evidence for a Significant Cost of Mate Search , 2006 .

[24]  C. J. McKenna Uncertainty and the Labour Market: Recent Developments in Job Search Theory , 1985 .