Developing innovation competences in engineering students: a comparison of two approaches

Thegapbetween industry needs and engineering graduates’ competences is being tackled by project-based courses, which also help to develop key innovation competences to address current societal challenges. Nevertheless, there is limited understanding about what innovation competences are developed through the different types of project-based courses. This study discusses innovation competences development in these courses with the aim of understanding how to better design educational strategies to improve them. Through content analysis, we compare the outcomes of two groups of Telecom Engineering students undergoing a capstone course following a classical product development project approach and a challenge-based course using Design Thinking. Results show that both course types contribute to developing innovation competences. Nevertheless, depending on the chosen pedagogy some competences are developed further. The traditional project-based course demonstrates better results in Planning and Managing Projects. Creativity, Leadership, and Entrepreneurship are more developed through a challenge-based approach combined with Design Thinking. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 20 July 2020 Accepted 11 August 2021

[1]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[2]  Amparo García-Carbonell,et al.  Proposal of a Framework for Innovation Competencies Development and Assessment (FINCODA) , 2016 .

[3]  H. Lappalainen,et al.  Innovation pedagogy : learning through active multidisciplinary methods. 'Pedagogía de la Innovación : aprendiendo con métodos activos multidisciplinares' , 2012 .

[4]  Kristina Edström,et al.  Rethinking engineering education - The CDIO approach, 2nd ed , 2014 .

[5]  Eduard Alarcon,et al.  Mixed Integration of CDIO skills into Telecommunication Engineering Curricula , 2010 .

[6]  Laurence F. Johnson,et al.  Challenge-Based Learning: An Approach for Our Time , 2009 .

[7]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Managing the Unknown: A New Approach to Managing High Uncertainty and Risk in Projects , 2006 .

[8]  Elizabeth Chell,et al.  The identification and measurement of innovative characteristics of young people: development of the YouthInnovation Skills Measurement Tool , 2009 .

[9]  Juan A. Marin-Garcia,et al.  Validation of a rubric to assess innovation competence , 2012 .

[10]  R. Weber.  Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[11]  F. Gault.  The Oslo Manual , 2013 .

[12]  Martin Lehmann,et al.  Problem-oriented and project-based learning (POPBL) as an innovative learning strategy for sustainable development in engineering education , 2008 .

[13]  Lotta Hassi,et al.  Mixing design, management and engineering students in challenge-based projects , 2016 .

[14]  Sebastian Fixson,et al.  Teaching innovation through interdisciplinary courses and programmes in product design and development: an analysis at 16 US schools , 2009, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[15]  Johan Malmqvist,et al.  The CDIO Syllabus v2.0. An Updated Statement of Goals for Engineering Education , 2011 .

[16]  G. Sáez,et al.  Proceso de inserción de competencias genéricas en los nuevos planes de estudios de grado de la ETSETB de acuerdo con el modelo cdio , 1970 .

[17]  Lotta Hassi,et al.  Challenge based education: an approach to innovation through multidisciplinary teams of students using Design Thinking , 2018, 2018 XIII Technologies Applied to Electronics Teaching Conference (TAEE).

[18]  R. Slavin.  Research methods in education , 1992 .

[19]  Mary Besterfield-Sacre,et al.  The ABET “Professional Skills” — Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed? , 2005 .

[20]  J. Prus,et al.  A critical review of student assessment options , 1994 .

[21]  Tim Brown,et al.  Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation , 2009 .

[22]  Johan Malmqvist,et al.  Rethinking Engineering Education - The CDIO Approach , 2007 .

[23]  D. French,et al.  Sustainable Development Goals , 2021, Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

[24]  Ian Alexander,et al.  An introduction to qualitative research , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[25]  L.J. Leifer,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[26]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[27]  C. Bloch,et al.  Oslo Manual - Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd edition: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data , 2005 .

[28]  Renata Tesch,et al.  Qualitative research : analysis types and software tools , 1990 .

[29]  Andrew Peter Wallace McCarthy.  E DITOR ’ S C OMMENTS Diversity of Design Science Research , 2022 .

[30]  Sara L. Beckman,et al.  Innovation as a Learning Process: Embedding Design Thinking , 2007 .

[31]  Thomas Lockwood,et al.  The Influence of Design Thinking in Business: Some Preliminary Observations , 2010 .

[32]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency , 2024, Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo.

[33]  Santeri Palomäki.  Impacts of a challenge-based innovation project course on the entrepreneurial intentions of multidisciplinary student teams , 2019 .

[34]  T. Robinson,et al.  Sustainable Development Goals , 2016 .