An innovative tapping system, the double cut alternative, to improve the yield of Hevea brasiliensis in Thai rubber plantations

In Thailand, the continuous decrease in the size of rubber plantations has led to the general adoption of intensive tapping systems which may lead to over harvesting, high rates of tapping panel dryness (TPD), short life-cycles of the plantations, and low labour productivity. In Thailand, farmers use a half-spiral downward tapping system (S/2) or a one third-spiral (S/3) with a tapping frequency of once two days (d2) or more. To increase productivity, it is difficult to reduce tapping frequencies, even with ethylene stimulation, as this would result in days without work for tappers. The purpose of this study was to characterize the behaviour of the Hevea latex yield under the double cut alternative tapping system (DCA). The aim was ensure the long-term sustainability of latex yield by increasing the time required for latex regeneration between two tappings through splitting this high tapping intensity (100% or above) into two different tapping cuts tapped alternately (S/2 d47d7(t,t). Over a period of 10 years, compared to a single cut tapping system (S/2 d2) of equivalent intensity, DCA increased cumulative rubber production by 9%. Ability of the trees to produce more latex under DCA was related to the sucrose and inorganic phosphorus contents of the latex cells in each tapping panel. DCA produced metabolic activity more favourable to yield during the first 10 years of tapping. But DCA also resulted in higher TPD rates, a sign of a metabolic dysfunction of the productive bark. DCA is a new tapping system. Further research is required to optimize the use of the DCA strategy. Such research will lead to new advances in our knowledge of the physiology of the rubber tree, mainly at the trunk scale.

[1]  D. Roussel,et al.  Yield limiting factors, latex physiological parameters, latex diagnosis, and clonal typology , 1989 .

[2]  É. Gohet,et al.  Long-term effect of ethylene stimulation on the yield of rubber trees is linked to latex cell biochemistry , 2010 .

[3]  H. Taussky,et al.  A microcolorimetric method for the determination of inorganic phosphorus. , 1953, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[4]  R. Lacrotte,et al.  Photosynthate allocation and productivity of latex vessels inHevea brasiliensis , 1986, Biologia Plantarum.

[5]  L. Coulibaly,et al.  Effect of tapping systems and height of tapping opening on clone PB 235 agronomic parameters and it's susceptibility to tapping panel dryness in south-east of Côte d'Ivoire , 2009 .

[6]  H. Chrestin,et al.  Influence de l'éthylène sur l'utilisation du saccharose exogène par les laticifères d'Hevea brasiliensis: proposition d'un mécanisme d'action , 1985 .

[7]  W. C. Schneider Colorimetric Analysis of Sugar. , 1957 .

[8]  Eric Gohet La production de latex par Hevea brasiliensis. Relations avec la croissance. Influence de différents facteurs : origine clonale, stimulation hormonale, réserves hydrocarbonées , 1996 .

[9]  G. Ashwell [12] Colorimetric analysis of sugars , 1957 .

[10]  P. Thaler,et al.  Carbohydrate reserves as a competing sink: evidence from tapping rubber trees. , 2007, Tree physiology.

[11]  B. Buttery,et al.  Manometric Measurement of Turgor Pressures in Laticiferous Phloem Tissues2 , 1966 .

[12]  É. Gohet,et al.  Panel management in rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) tapping and impact on yield, growth, and latex diagnosis , 2004 .

[13]  V. Pujade-Renaud,et al.  The regulation of cis-polyisoprene production (natural rubber) from Hevea brasiliensis , 1997 .