How Social Are Task Representations?

The classical Simon effect shows that actions are carried out faster if they spatially correspond to the stimulus signaling them. Recent studies revealed that this is the case even when the two actions are carried out by different people; this finding has been taken to imply that task representations are socially shared. In work described here, we found that the “interactive” Simon effect occurs only if actor and coactor are involved in a positive relationship (induced by a friendly-acting, cooperative confederate), but not if they are involved in a negative relationship (induced by an intimidating, competitive confederate). This result suggests that agents can represent self-generated and other-generated actions separately, but tend to relate or integrate these representations if the personal relationship between self and other has a positive valence.

[1]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. , 2002, Psychological review.

[2]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  R. Wallace,et al.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Marcel Brass,et al.  The Inhibition of Imitative Response Tendencies , 2001, NeuroImage.

[5]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Joint action: bodies and minds moving together , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  W. Prinz,et al.  Representing others' actions: just like one's own? , 2003, Cognition.

[7]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  A. Aron,et al.  Close Relationships as Including Other in the Self , 1991 .

[9]  Wen-Jui Kuo,et al.  A common coding framework in self–other interaction: evidence from joint action task , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[11]  Jonathan S. Leonard,et al.  The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network , 2003 .

[12]  M. Brass,et al.  The inhibition of imitative and overlearned responses: a functional double dissociation , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  W. Prinz,et al.  How two share a task: corepresenting stimulus-response mappings. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Günther Knoblich,et al.  The Social Nature of Perception and Action , 2006 .

[15]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[16]  B. Hommel.  The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap , 1993 .

[17]  W. Prinz,et al.  Far from action-blind: Representation of others' actions in individuals with Autism , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[18]  Michael W. Kraus,et al.  The Relational Self , 2011 .

[19]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Twin Peaks: An ERP Study of Action Planning and Control in Coacting Individuals , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  R. Proctor,et al.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  Serena Chen,et al.  The relational self: an interpersonal social-cognitive theory. , 2002, Psychological review.