The thalidomide disaster, lessons from the past.

It is close to 60 years since thalidomide was created by the German company, Chemie-Grünenthal, and launched as "Contergan." This was soon to be followed in England by the launch of "Distaval." Of all the drugs developed in the intervening years, thalidomide has undoubtedly had the greatest influence on shaping the Pharmaceutical Industry as we know it today.Strong marketing pressure in an Industry hungry for new medicines brought an inadequately tested drug to the market, targeted outsourcing quickly expanded the client base and finally market forces prevented timely withdrawal, even when evidence was emerging of disastrous side-effects. The full story of thalidomide was told by the Sunday Times in "Suffer The Children" (Kingsley et al., Suffer the children: the story of thalidomide, the insight team of the Sunday times (UK), 1979).Many preventative measures have been taken in the intervening years in light of the lessons learned with thalidomide. However, many of the pressures that led to the thalidomide disaster exist today with record high management and shareholder pressures to achieve success, parallel worldwide marketing, increased numbers of targeted outsourcing by small companies forming alliances with "Big Pharma" and, according to some commentators, a breakdown in the system of checks and balances that have existed in the regulatory authorities in the intervening years.Using thalidomide as a point of reference, this chapter looks at drug development and testing, regulatory authorities and guidelines, outsourcing and in-licensing, pharmacovigilance, and factors that influence withdrawal of a drug from the market.

[1]  D. Burley,et al.  Clinical experience with a new sedative drug. , 1959, The Practitioner.

[2]  R. L. Jordan,et al.  The teratogenic activity of a thalidomide analogue, EM 12 in rabbits, rats, and monkeys. , 1972, Teratology.

[3]  U. Banerjee,et al.  A comparative study of several methods for recording spontaneous motor activity in mice under drug effects. , 1976, Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[4]  J. Schardein Drugs as teratogens , 1976 .

[5]  Sumner J. Yaffe,et al.  Drugs in Pregnancy and Lactation: A Reference Guide to Fetal and Neonatal Risk, 8th Edition , 1986 .

[6]  T. Collins Symposium VIII: Regulatory Update: Redbook Presentations from the 17th Annual Meeting of the American College of Toxicology, 11-13 November 1996 , 1998 .

[7]  R. Sprando,et al.  Testing Guidelines for Evaluation of Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity of Food Additives in Females , 1998 .

[8]  M. Lapeyre-Mestre,et al.  Adverse drug reactions and off-label drug use in paediatric outpatients. , 2002, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[9]  J. Caldwell,et al.  Putting chirality to work: the strategy of chiral switches , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[10]  T. Collins History and evolution of reproductive and developmental toxicology guidelines. , 2006, Current pharmaceutical design.

[11]  R. Clark,et al.  Developmental toxicity of artesunate in the rat: comparison to other artemisinins, comparison of embryotoxicity and kinetics by oral and intravenous routes, and relationship to maternal reticulocyte count. , 2008, Birth defects research. Part B, Developmental and reproductive toxicology.

[12]  R. Clark Embryotoxicity of the artemisinin antimalarials and potential consequences for use in women in the first trimester. , 2009, Reproductive toxicology.