Unbiased Forward Genetic Screening with Chemical Mutagenesis to Uncover Drug-Target Interactions.

The steadily increasing throughput in next-generation sequencing technologies is revolutionizing a number of fields in biology. One application requiring massive parallel sequencing is forward genetic screening based on chemical mutagenesis. Such screens interrogate the entire genome in an entirely unbiased fashion and can be applied to a number of research questions. CRISPR/Cas9-based screens, which are largely limited to a gene's loss of function, have already been very successful in identifying drug targets and pathways related to the drug's mode of action. By inducing single nucleotide changes using an alkylating reagent, it is possible to generate amino acid changes that perturb the interaction between a drug and its direct target, resulting in drug resistance. This chemogenomic approach combined with latest sequencing technologies allows deconvolution of drug targets and characterization of drug-target binding interfaces at amino acid resolution, therefore nicely complementing existing biochemical approaches. Here we describe a general protocol for a chemical mutagenesis-based forward genetic screen applicable for drug-target deconvolution.

[1]  Nicole M. Gaudelli,et al.  Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage , 2017, Nature.

[2]  David R. Liu,et al.  Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage , 2016, Nature.

[3]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  The histone chaperone CAF-1 safeguards somatic cell identity , 2015, Nature.

[4]  J. Zuber,et al.  Forward and reverse genetics through derivation of haploid mouse embryonic stem cells. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[5]  David A. Scott,et al.  Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system , 2013, Nature Protocols.

[6]  John A. Tallarico,et al.  High-resolution chemical dissection of a model eukaryote reveals targets, pathways and gene functions. , 2014, Microbiological research.

[7]  Daniel St Johnston,et al.  The art and design of genetic screens: Drosophila melanogaster , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[8]  Pablo Cingolani,et al.  © 2012 Landes Bioscience. Do not distribute. , 2022 .

[9]  A. Antebi,et al.  Hexosamine Pathway Metabolites Enhance Protein Quality Control and Prolong Life , 2014, Cell.

[10]  M. Peifer,et al.  Unbiased compound-protein interface mapping and prediction of chemoresistance loci through forward genetics in haploid stem cells , 2018, Oncotarget.

[11]  D. Beranek Distribution of methyl and ethyl adducts following alkylation with monofunctional alkylating agents. , 1990, Mutation research.

[12]  Heng Li Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM , 2013, 1303.3997.

[13]  D. Hilton,et al.  The art and design of genetic screens: mouse , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[14]  A. Saghatelian,et al.  Methods for the elucidation of protein-small molecule interactions. , 2013, Chemistry & biology.

[15]  Erik M. Jorgensen,et al.  The art and design of genetic screens: Caenorhabditis elegans , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[16]  S. Forsburg The art and design of genetic screens: yeast , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.