Informal university technology transfer: a comparison between the United States and Germany

Existing literature has confined university technology transfer almost exclusively to formal mechanisms, like patents, licenses or royalty agreements. Relatively little is known about informal technology transfer that is based upon interactions between university scientists and industry personnel. Moreover, most studies are limited to the United States, where the Bayh-Dole Act has shaped the institutional environment since 1980. In this paper, we provide a comparative study between the United States and Germany where the equivalent of the Bayh-Dole Act has come into force only in 2002. Based on a sample of more than 800 university scientists, our results show similar relationships for the United States and Germany. Faculty quality which is however based on patent applications rather than publications serves as a major predictor for informal technology transfer activities. Hence, unless universities change their incentives (e.g., patenting as one criterion for promotion and tenure) knowledge will continue to flow out the backdoor.

[1]  Albert N. Link,et al.  On the Growth of U.S. Science Parks , 2003 .

[2]  James D. Adams,et al.  Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  P. Matthyssens,et al.  Critical Role and Screening Practices of European Business Incubators , 2005 .

[4]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature , 2007 .

[5]  H. Etzkowitz.  Research groups as ???quasi-firms???: the invention of the entrepreneurial university , 2003 .

[6]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Who is Selling the Ivory Tower , 2000 .

[7]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  WHO'S PATENTING IN THE UNIVERSITY? EVIDENCE FROM THE SURVEY OF DOCTORATE RECIPIENTS , 2007 .

[8]  Fiona E. Murray.  The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life , 2004 .

[9]  Maryann Feldman,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Equity and the Technology Transfer Strategies of American Research Universities , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[10]  L. Zucker,et al.  Star scientists and institutional transformation: patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  M. Perkmann,et al.  University Industry Relationships and Open Innovation: Towards a Research Agenda , 2007 .

[12]  Mark Schankerman,et al.  Royalty Sharing and Technology Licensing in Universities , 2004 .

[13]  Albert N. Link,et al.  Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Technological Change , 2007 .

[14]  A. Jaffe.  Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[15]  Jerry G. Thursby,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Who Is Selling the Ivory Tower? Sources of Growth in University Licensing , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[16]  Christian Kilger,et al.  New Rules for German Professors , 2002, Science.

[17]  A. Link,et al.  Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. , 2004 .

[18]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Reprinted Article Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT , 2009 .

[19]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Heterogeneity of Patenting Activity and Its Implications for Scientific Research , 2007 .

[20]  Albert N. Link,et al.  Generating science-based growth: an econometric analysis of the impact of organizational incentives on university–industry technology transfer , 2005 .

[21]  Katrin Hussinger,et al.  Commercializing academic research: the quality of faculty patenting , 2011 .

[22]  Phillip H. Phan,et al.  Analyzing the Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Implications for Entrepreneurship Education , 2005 .

[23]  A. Link,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Propensity of Academics to Engage In Informal University Technology Transfer , 2007 .

[24]  Anne W. Fuller,et al.  Us Faculty Patenting: Inside and Outside the University , 2007 .

[25]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .

[26]  Joseph Friedman,et al.  University Technology Transfer: Do Incentives, Management, and Location Matter? , 2003 .

[27]  W. Glänzel,et al.  Patent and Publication Activities of German Professors: An Empirical Assessment of Their Co-Activity , 2007 .