Mechanism Design for Resource Allocation in Networks With Intergroup Competition and Intragroup Sharing

We consider a network where strategic agents, who are contesting for allocation of resources, are divided into fixed groups. The network control protocol is such that within each group agents get to share the resource and across groups they contest for it. A prototypical example is the allocation of data rate on a network with the multicast/multirate architecture. Compared to the unicast architecture (which is a special case), the multicast/multirate architecture can result in substantial bandwidth savings. However, design of a market mechanism in such a scenario requires dealing with both private and public good problems as opposed to just private goods in unicast. The mechanism proposed in this paper ensures that social welfare maximizing allocation on such a network is realized at all Nash equilibria (NE), i.e., full implementation in NE. In addition it is individually rational, i.e., agents have an incentive to participate in the mechanism. The mechanism, which is constructed in a quasi-systematic way starting from the dual of the centralized problem, has a number of useful properties. Specifically, due to a novel allocation scheme, namely “radial projection,” the proposed mechanism results in feasible allocation even off equilibrium. This is a practical necessity for any realistic mechanism since agents have to “learn” the NE through a dynamic process. Finally, it is shown how strong budget balance at equilibrium can be achieved with a minimal increase in message space as an add-on to a weakly budget balanced mechanism.

[1]  Mingyi Hong,et al.  Mechanism Design for Base Station Association and Resource Allocation in Downlink OFDMA Network , 2012, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[2]  Frank Kelly,et al.  Rate control for communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[3]  T.M. Stoenescu,et al.  A Pricing Mechanism which Implements in Nash Equilibria a Rate Allocation Problem in Networks , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[4]  K. Arrow,et al.  Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare , 2011 .

[5]  Ali Kakhbod,et al.  An Efficient Game Form for Unicast Service Provisioning , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[6]  Koushik Kar,et al.  Progressive second price auctions with elastic supply for PEV charging in the smart gric , 2014, 2014 7th International Conference on NETwork Games, COntrol and OPtimization (NetGCoop).

[7]  A. Mas-Colell,et al.  Microeconomic Theory , 1995 .

[8]  Andrew Postlewaite,et al.  Feasible and Continuous Implementation , 1989 .

[9]  Tilman Börgers,et al.  An introduction to the theory of mechanism design , 2015 .

[10]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Efficiency of Scalar-Parameterized Mechanisms , 2008, Oper. Res..

[11]  Bruce Hajek,et al.  Revenue and Stability of a Mechanism for Efficient Allocation of a Divisible Good , 2005 .

[12]  P. Healy,et al.  Designing stable mechanisms for economic environments , 2012 .

[13]  T. Başar,et al.  Nash Equilibrium and Decentralized Negotiation in Auctioning Divisible Resources , 2003 .

[14]  Don Towsley,et al.  The impact of multicast layering on network fairness , 2002, TNET.

[15]  Yan Chen,et al.  A family of supermodular Nash mechanisms implementing Lindahl allocations , 2002 .

[16]  Demosthenis Teneketzis,et al.  Local Public Good Provisioning in Networks: A Nash Implementation Mechanism , 2012, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[17]  Jean C. Walrand,et al.  An efficient Nash-implementation mechanism for network resource allocation , 2010, Autom..

[18]  E. Maskin,et al.  Implementation Theory∗ , 2002 .

[19]  Leonid Hurwicz,et al.  Economic design, adjustment processes, mechanisms, and institutions , 1994 .

[20]  T. Groves,et al.  Optimal Allocation of Public Goods: A Solution to the 'Free Rider Problem' , 1977 .

[21]  L. Hurwicz Outcome Functions Yielding Walrasian and Lindahl Allocations at Nash Equilibrium Points , 1979 .

[22]  Bruce Hajek,et al.  VCG-Kelly Mechanisms for Allocation of Divisible Goods: Adapting VCG Mechanisms to One-Dimensional Signals , 2006 .

[23]  Mingyan Liu,et al.  Multirate multicast service provisioning I: an algorithm for optimal price splitting along multicast trees , 2007, Math. Methods Oper. Res..

[24]  Michael J. Neely Optimal pricing in a free market wireless network , 2007, IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[25]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Efficiency loss in a network resource allocation game: the case of elastic supply , 2005, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[26]  Ali Kakhbod,et al.  An Efficient Game Form for Multi-Rate Multicast Service Provisioning , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[27]  Leandros Tassiulas,et al.  Fair allocation of utilities in multirate multicast networks: a framework for unifying diverse fairness objectives , 2002, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[28]  L. Tassiulas,et al.  Layered multicast rate control based on Lagrangian relaxation and dynamic programming , 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[29]  Leandros Tassiulas,et al.  Optimization based rate control for multirate multicast sessions , 2001, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213).

[30]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Decentralized Computation of Weighted Max-Min Fair Bandwidth Allocation in Networks with Multicast Flows , 2001, IWDC.

[31]  R.T. Maheswaran,et al.  Social welfare of selfish agents: motivating efficiency for divisible resources , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[32]  Guoqiang Tian,et al.  Implementation of the Lindahl Correspondence by a Single-Valued, Feasible, and Continuous Mechanism , 1989 .

[33]  Abhinav Sinha,et al.  A practical mechanism for network utility maximization for unicast flows on the internet , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[34]  Koushik Kar,et al.  Extended Second Price Auctions With Elastic Supply for PEV Charging in the Smart Grid , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[35]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Mechanisms and Games for Dynamic Spectrum Allocation: Preface , 2013 .

[36]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Algorithmic Game Theory , 2007 .