Low-echoic lesions underneath the skin in subjects with spinal-cord injury

Study design:Criterion standard and survey cases.Objectives:To assess the utility of ultrasonography for detecting deep tissue injury or incipient pressure ulcers and to determine the patterns of development of pressure ulcers in subjects with chronic spinal-cord injury (SCI).Setting:Ambulatory setting at public hospital.Methods:The subjects were 43 men with SCI between C5 and L1 (age: 42.6±11.6 years, mean±s.d.). A total of 129 areas (sacral region and bilateral ischial regions in each subject) were examined by inspection, palpation and ultrasonography.Results:Of the 129 areas, 112 were normal by inspection, palpation and ultrasound imaging. Nine areas were abnormal on ultrasonography alone and six were lesion positive by palpation and ultrasonography. Only two areas were abnormal by all three methods. Ultrasonography always detected a heterogeneous pattern and low-echoic areas directly adjacent to the bone.Conclusions:Our results indicated that low-echoic lesions, signaling deep tissue injuries or early pressure ulcers, originated in areas near the bone and extended toward the epidermis. The results suggest that ultrasonography is a useful tool for the early detection of deep tissue injuries or pressure ulcers.

[1]  D L Bader,et al.  Compression-induced deep tissue injury examined with magnetic resonance imaging and histology. , 2006, Journal of applied physiology.

[2]  M. Kosiak,et al.  Etiology and pathology of ischemic ulcers. , 1959, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  Courtney H. Lyder,et al.  Use of High-Resolution, High-Frequency Diagnostic Ultrasound to Investigate the Pathogenesis of Pressure Ulcer Development , 2006, Advances in skin & wound care.

[4]  L M Vistnes,et al.  Differential Response of Skin and Muscle in the Experimental Production of Pressure Sores , 1980, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  M. Gordon,et al.  Review of evidenced-based practice for the prevention of pressure sores in burn patients. , 2004, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[6]  G A Ksander,et al.  An In‐Depth Look at Pressure Sores Using Monolithic Silicon Pressure Sensors , 1984, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  M. Kosiak,et al.  Etiology of decubitus ulcers. , 1961, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  L C Parish,et al.  Histopathology of the decubitus ulcer. , 1982, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[9]  B. Oot-Giromini,et al.  Pressure ulcer prevention versus treatment, comparative product cost study. , 1989, Decubitus.

[10]  Smaroula Dilioglou,et al.  Review of Immune Function, Healing of Pressure Ulcers, and Nutritional Status in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury , 2000, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[11]  T J Ryan,et al.  The effect of mechanical forces (vibration or external compression) on the dermal water content of the upper dermis and epidermis, assessed by high frequency ultrasound. , 2001, Journal of tissue viability.

[12]  Pressure ulcers prevalence, cost and risk assessment: consensus development conference statement--The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. , 1989, Decubitus.

[13]  B. Kuhn,et al.  Balancing the pressure ulcer cost and quality equation. , 1992, Nursing economic$.

[14]  Victor Alterescu,et al.  PRESSURE ULCERS: GUIDELINES FOR PREVENTION AND NURSING MANAGEMENT , 1991 .

[15]  D. Langemo,et al.  National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel's updated pressure ulcer staging system. , 2007, Advances in skin & wound care.