Lesional skin in vitiligo exhibits delayed in vivo reepithelialization compared to the nonlesional skin

Vitiligo, a common skin disorder, is characterized by the loss of functional melanocytes resulting in the depigmentation of skin. Previous studies have demonstrated molecular and architectural alterations in the epidermal keratinocytes upon loss of melanocytes. The physiological implications of these “altered” keratinocytes are yet not known. We investigated the wound healing efficiency of lesional vs nonlesional skin in 12 subjects with stable nonsegmental vitiligo using histological and ultrastructural evaluation of partial‐thickness wounds. The wounds were examined 12 days postinjury, coinciding with the reepithelialization phase of healing marked primarily by keratinocyte migration and proliferation. This study demonstrated a significant difference in the reepithelialization potential between the lesional and nonlesional skin. While all 12 nonlesional wounds demonstrated considerable neoepidermis formation on the 12th day post wound, only four of the corresponding lesional samples showed comparable reepithelialization; the rest remaining in the inflammatory phase. Ultrastructural studies using transmission electron microscopy as well as immunohistochemical staining revealed a reduced number of desmosomes, shorter keratin tonofilaments and an increase in myofibroblast population in the dermis of lesional reepithelialized tissue compared to the nonlesional reepithelialized samples. This study implicates gross functional perturbations in the lesional skin during physiological wound healing in vitiligo, suggesting that the breakdown of keratinocyte‐melanocyte network results in delayed wound repair kinetics in the lesional skin when compared to patient‐matched nonlesional skin.

[1]  Nur Aimi Mohd Nasir,et al.  Fluorescent cell tracer dye permits real‐time assessment of re‐epithelialization in a serum‐free ex vivo human skin wound assay , 2018, Wound Repair and Regeneration.

[2]  L. Hynan,et al.  Lack of correlation of the patient‐derived Vitiligo Disease Activity Index with the clinician‐derived Vitiligo Area Scoring Index , 2017, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[3]  J. Rambert,et al.  Vitiligo Skin Is Imprinted with Resident Memory CD8 T Cells Expressing CXCR3. , 2017, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[4]  M. Picardo,et al.  Vitiligo Skin: Exploring the Dermal Compartment. , 2017, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[5]  Vivek T. Natarajan,et al.  Mapping architectural and transcriptional alterations in non-lesional and lesional epidermis in vitiligo , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[6]  A. Bayat,et al.  Noninvasive device readouts validated by immunohistochemical analysis enable objective quantitative assessment of acute wound healing in human skin , 2015, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[7]  A. Bayat,et al.  Optimization of an ex vivo wound healing model in the adult human skin: Functional evaluation using photodynamic therapy , 2015, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[8]  Eun-So Lee,et al.  Changes of Epidermal Thickness in Vitiligo , 2015, The American Journal of dermatopathology.

[9]  Paul Martin,et al.  Wound repair and regeneration: Mechanisms, signaling, and translation , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[10]  A. Bayat,et al.  Electrical Stimulation and Cutaneous Wound Healing: A Review of Clinical Evidence , 2014, Healthcare.

[11]  V. Setaluri,et al.  Oxidative Stress and Vitiligo: The Nrf2-ARE Signaling Connection , 2014, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[12]  P. Bainbridge,et al.  Wound healing and the role of fibroblasts. , 2013, Journal of wound care.

[13]  Fulin Gao,et al.  The contribution of melanocytes to pathological scar formation during wound healing. , 2013, International journal of clinical and experimental medicine.

[14]  Paul Martin,et al.  Inflammation drives wound hyperpigmentation in zebrafish by recruiting pigment cells to sites of tissue damage , 2012, Disease Models & Mechanisms.

[15]  Miao-ni Zhou,et al.  CD8+ T cells from vitiligo perilesional margins induce autologous melanocyte apoptosis , 2012, Molecular medicine reports.

[16]  C. Blanpain,et al.  Development and homeostasis of the skin epidermis. , 2012, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[17]  Vivek T. Natarajan,et al.  Transcriptional upregulation of Nrf2-dependent phase II detoxification genes in the involved epidermis of vitiligo vulgaris. , 2010, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[18]  B. Smoller,et al.  Special Stains in Dermatopathology , 2009 .

[19]  T. Wilgus,et al.  Immune cells in the healing skin wound: influential players at each stage of repair. , 2008, Pharmacological research.

[20]  E. Dellambra,et al.  Keratinocyte cultures from involved skin in vitiligo patients show an impaired in vitro behaviour. , 2007, Pigment cell research.

[21]  Sabine Werner,et al.  Keratinocyte-fibroblast interactions in wound healing. , 2007, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[22]  L. DiPietro,et al.  Neutrophil function in the healing wound: adding insult to injury? , 2004, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[23]  T. Löning,et al.  Immunomorphological and ultrastructural aspects of keratinocyte migration in epidermal wound healing , 2004, Virchows Archiv A.

[24]  K. Namba,et al.  Neuropeptide Regulation of Immunity: The Immunosuppressive Activity of Alpha‐Melanocyte‐Stimulating Hormone (α‐MSH) , 2000, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[25]  T. Ohnishi,et al.  Supranuclear melanin caps reduce ultraviolet induced DNA photoproducts in human epidermis. , 1998, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[26]  T. Luger,et al.  The role of alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone in cutaneous biology. , 1997, The journal of investigative dermatology. Symposium proceedings.

[27]  T. Luger,et al.  The Role of α-Melanocyte-Stimulating Hormone in Cutaneous Biology , 1997 .

[28]  H. Wulf,et al.  Photoprotection in vitiligo and normal skin. A quantitative assessment of the role of stratum corneum, viable epidermis and pigmentation. , 1996, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[29]  J. Bhawan,et al.  Keratinocyte damage in vitiligo , 1983, Journal of cutaneous pathology.

[30]  J. Nordlund,et al.  Extracellular granular material and degeneration of keratinocytes in the normally pigmented epidermis of patients with vitiligo. , 1982, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[31]  Cohen Ik,et al.  Hypertrophic scars and keloids. A collective review. , 1974 .