A 3D morphometric perspective for facial gender analysis and classification using geodesic path curvature features

The relationship between the shape and gender of a face, with particular application to automatic gender classification, has been the subject of significant research in recent years. Determining the gender of a face, especially when dealing with unseen examples, presents a major challenge. This is especially true for certain age groups, such as teenagers, due to their rapid development at this phase of life. This study proposes a new set of facial morphological descriptors, based on 3D geodesic path curvatures, and uses them for gender analysis. Their goal is to discern key facial areas related to gender, specifically suited to the task of gender classification. These new curvature-based features are extracted along the geodesic path between two biological landmarks located in key facial areas.Classification performance based on the new features is compared with that achieved using the Euclidean and geodesic distance measures traditionally used in gender analysis and classification. Five different experiments were conducted on a large teenage face database (4745 faces from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children) to investigate and justify the use of the proposed curvature features. Our experiments show that the combination of the new features with geodesic distances provides a classification accuracy of 89%. They also show that nose-related traits provide the most discriminative facial feature for gender classification, with the most discriminative features lying along the 3D face profile curve.

[1]  D. Perrett,et al.  What Gives a Face its Gender? , 1993, Perception.

[2]  Hao Zhang,et al.  Expression-insensitive 3D face recognition using sparse representation , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[3]  Edwin R. Hancock,et al.  Facial gender classification using shape-from-shading , 2010, Image Vis. Comput..

[4]  Ligang Liu,et al.  Fast Wavefront Propagation (FWP) for Computing Exact Geodesic Distances on Meshes , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[5]  Laurent D. Cohen,et al.  Global Minimum for Active Contour Models: A Minimal Path Approach , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[6]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Sex Classification is Better with Three-Dimensional Head Structure Than with Image Intensity Information , 1997, Perception.

[7]  S. Palmer Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  SEXNET: A Neural Network Identifies Sex From Human Faces , 1990, NIPS.

[9]  A. David Marshall,et al.  Automatic Classification of Facial Morphology for Medical Applications , 2015, KES.

[10]  Keenan Crane,et al.  Geodesics in heat: A new approach to computing distance based on heat flow , 2012, TOGS.

[11]  Chung How Kau,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of facial morphology surface changes in untreated children from 12 to 14 years of age. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[12]  S. Richmond,et al.  The prevalence of lip vermilion morphological traits in a 15‐year‐old population , 2013, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[13]  Syed Zulqarnain Gilani,et al.  Geometric Facial Gender Scoring: Objectivity of Perception , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  R. Nanda,et al.  Adolescent growth changes in soft tissue profile. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  A. M. Burton,et al.  What's the Difference between Men and Women? Evidence from Facial Measurement , 1993, Perception.

[16]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Automatic feature extraction for multiview 3D face recognition , 2006, 7th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FGR06).

[17]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[18]  Gabriel Taubin,et al.  Estimating the tensor of curvature of a surface from a polyhedral approximation , 1995, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[19]  Ajmal S. Mian,et al.  Perceptual Differences between Men and Women: A 3D Facial Morphometric Perspective , 2014, 2014 22nd International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[20]  Laurent D. Cohen,et al.  Geodesic Computations for Fast and Accurate Surface Remeshing and Parameterization , 2005 .

[21]  Zhongke Wu,et al.  3D Facial Similarity Measure Based on Geodesic Network and Curvatures , 2014 .

[22]  S. Leong,et al.  Aesthetic proportions of the nasal aperture in 3 different racial groups of men. , 2005, Archives of facial plastic surgery.

[23]  Yijie Han,et al.  Shortest paths on a polyhedron , 1990, SCG '90.

[24]  D. Enlow Handbook of facial growth , 1975 .

[25]  Hassan Ugail,et al.  Gender Classification Based on 3D Face Geometry Features Using SVM , 2009, 2009 International Conference on CyberWorlds.

[26]  Ioannis A. Kakadiaris,et al.  Automatic 3D Facial Region Retrieval from Multi-pose Facial Datasets , 2009, 3DOR@Eurographics.

[27]  José Miguel Buenaposada,et al.  Revisiting Linear Discriminant Techniques in Gender Recognition , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[28]  Hassen Drira,et al.  Pose and Expression-Invariant 3D Face Recognition using Elastic Radial Curves , 2010, BMVC.

[29]  L. Bolton Adolescent growth patterns of the bony and cartilaginous framework of the nose. A cephalometric study. , 1999 .

[30]  Shi-Qing Xin,et al.  Parallel chen-han (PCH) algorithm for discrete geodesics , 2013, ACM Trans. Graph..

[31]  Chitra Dorai,et al.  COSMOS - A Representation Scheme for 3D Free-Form Objects , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[32]  C. Cacou Anthropometry of the head and face , 1995 .

[33]  Ye Duan,et al.  Facial phenotypes in subgroups of prepubertal boys with autism spectrum disorders are correlated with clinical phenotypes , 2011, Molecular autism.

[34]  Frank B. ter Haar,et al.  A 3D face matching framework for facial curves , 2009, Graph. Model..

[35]  J. Ayres,et al.  Household chemicals, persistent wheezing and lung function: effect modification by atopy? , 2008, European Respiratory Journal.

[36]  Maurício Pamplona Segundo,et al.  3D Face Recognition Using Simulated Annealing and the Surface Interpenetration Measure , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[37]  JEAN-MARC FELLOUS,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(97)00010-2 , 2003 .

[38]  Tobias Gehrig,et al.  Draft : Evaluation Guidelines for Gender Classification and Age Estimation , 2011 .

[39]  Szymon Rusinkiewicz,et al.  Estimating curvatures and their derivatives on triangle meshes , 2004, Proceedings. 2nd International Symposium on 3D Data Processing, Visualization and Transmission, 2004. 3DPVT 2004..

[40]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Multimodal Facial Gender and Ethnicity Identification , 2006, ICB.

[41]  J. Gower Generalized procrustes analysis , 1975 .

[42]  A. M. Burton,et al.  Sex Discrimination: How Do We Tell the Difference between Male and Female Faces? , 1993, Perception.

[43]  Tieniu Tan,et al.  Automatic 3D face recognition combining global geometric features with local shape variation information , 2004, Sixth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 2004. Proceedings..

[44]  Michael G. Strintzis,et al.  3-D Face Recognition With the Geodesic Polar Representation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[45]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[46]  A. Toma Characterization of normal facial features and their association with genes , 2014 .

[47]  Driss Aboutajdine,et al.  Boosting 3-D-Geometric Features for Efficient Face Recognition and Gender Classification , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[48]  Dominique Valentin,et al.  Sex classification of face areas: How well can a linear neural network predict human performance? , 1998 .

[49]  D. Lawlor,et al.  Cohort Profile: The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children: ALSPAC mothers cohort , 2012, International journal of epidemiology.

[50]  S Richmond,et al.  Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on 3D laser-scanned facial images. , 2009, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[51]  Alexander M. Bronstein,et al.  Three-Dimensional Face Recognition , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[52]  Ramesh C. Jain,et al.  Invariant surface characteristics for 3D object recognition in range images , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[53]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Anthropometric 3D Face Recognition , 2010, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[54]  A. Ben Hamza,et al.  Geodesic matching of triangulated surfaces , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[55]  Andreas Christmann,et al.  Support vector machines , 2008, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook.

[56]  Pierre Alliez,et al.  Anisotropic polygonal remeshing , 2003, ACM Trans. Graph..

[57]  Ying He,et al.  Saddle vertex graph (SVG) , 2013, ACM Trans. Graph..

[58]  J. Brigham,et al.  Do “They all look alike?” The Effect of Race, Sex, Experience, and Attitudes on the Ability to Recognize Faces1 , 1978 .

[59]  Yunqi Lei,et al.  Geometric Features of 3D Face and Recognition of It by PCA , 2011, J. Multim..

[60]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Multimodal Facial Feature Extraction for Automatic 3D Face Recognition , 2005 .

[61]  Ning Wang,et al.  1 Sensitivity , Specificity , Accuracy , Associated Confidence Interval and ROC Analysis with Practical SAS , 2010 .

[62]  Shi-Qing Xin,et al.  Improving Chen and Han's algorithm on the discrete geodesic problem , 2009, TOGS.

[63]  Ashok Samal,et al.  How effective are landmarks and their geometry for face recognition? , 2006, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[64]  Steven J. Gortler,et al.  Fast exact and approximate geodesics on meshes , 2005, ACM Trans. Graph..

[65]  Marti A. Hearst Trends & Controversies: Support Vector Machines , 1998, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[66]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Matching 2.5D face scans to 3D models , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[67]  Hua Huang,et al.  Geodesic Video Stabilization in Transformation Space , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[68]  Marcel Campen,et al.  Efficient Computation of Shortest Path-Concavity for 3D Meshes , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[69]  A. O'Toole,et al.  An ‘other-Race Effect’ for Categorizing Faces by Sex , 1996, Perception.

[70]  A J O'Toole,et al.  More about the Difference between Men and Women: Evidence from Linear Neural Networks and the Principal-Component Approach , 1995, Perception.

[71]  James A. Sethian,et al.  Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods: Evolving Interfaces in Computational Geometry, Fluid , 2012 .

[72]  John W. Shepherd,et al.  THE FACE AND SOCIAL ATTRIBUTION , 1989 .

[73]  R. Malpass,et al.  Recognition for faces of own and other race. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[74]  David Cohen-Steiner,et al.  Restricted delaunay triangulations and normal cycle , 2003, SCG '03.

[75]  Jean-Marie Morvan,et al.  Curvature measures, normal cycles and asymptotic cones , 2013 .

[76]  Flip Phillips,et al.  Fechner, information, and shape perception , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[77]  Yong-Jin Liu,et al.  Exact geodesic metric in 2-manifold triangle meshes using edge-based data structures , 2013, Comput. Aided Des..