Response of an isolated cable-stayed bridge under bi-directional seismic actions

This paper investigates the effectiveness and limitations of seismic isolation for the earthquake protection of a cable-stayed bridge under bi-directional seismic actions. A simplified lumped mass finite element model of the Quincy Bay-view Bridge at Illinois is developed for the investigation. The deck of the bridge is isolated from the towers by using elastomeric and sliding isolation systems. For the non-linear isolation systems, the interaction between the restoring forces in two orthogonal horizontal directions is duly considered in the response analysis. The seismic response of the bridge is obtained by solving the governing equations of motion in the incremental form using an iterative step-by-step method. A parametric study is also performed by varying important parameters of the isolation systems. The seismic response of the isolated cable-stayed bridge is compared with the corresponding response of the bridge without isolation systems. The results of the investigation indicate that the peak base shear response of the towers and deck accelerations are significantly reduced by the isolation. The displacement response of the hysteretic isolation systems is found to be increased when the bi-directional interaction of the bearing force is considered in the response analysis. Furthermore, it is also found that the response of the bridge is significantly affected by the variation in the parameters of the isolation systems.

[1]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF SLIDING ISOLATED STRUCTURES WITH UPLIFT RESTRAINT , 1992 .

[2]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  A Simple Pendulum Technique for Achieving Seismic Isolation , 1990 .

[3]  Y. K. Wen,et al.  Random vibration of hysteretic systems under bi‐directional ground motions , 1986 .

[4]  John C. Wilson,et al.  Ambient vibration measurements on a cable-stayed bridge , 1991 .

[5]  R. S. Jangid,et al.  Seismic behaviour of base-isolated buildings : a state-of-the-art review , 1995 .

[6]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Dynamics of Structures—Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1996 .

[7]  John C. Wilson,et al.  Modelling of a cable‐stayed bridge for dynamic analysis , 1991 .

[8]  Ahmed M. Abdel-Ghaffar,et al.  SEISMIC ENERGY DISSIPATION FOR CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES USING PASSIVE DEVICES , 1994 .

[9]  K Kawashima,et al.  New design considerations for reducing seismic lateral force of highway bridges in Japan , 1989 .

[10]  R. S. Jangid,et al.  Seismic behavior of isolated bridges: A-state-of-the-art review , 2003 .

[11]  R. S. Jangid Computational numerical models for seismic response of structures isolated by sliding systems , 2005 .

[12]  Ronald L. Mayes,et al.  Seismic Isolation: History, Application, and Performance—A World View , 1990 .

[13]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of 3‐D‐Base‐Isolated Structures , 1991 .

[14]  N J Gimsing ANCHORED AND PARTIALLY ANCHORED STAYED BRIDGES , 1966 .

[15]  H I A Hegab STATIC ANALYSIS OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES. , 1986 .

[16]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[17]  John C. Wilson,et al.  Seismic isolation of cable‐stayed bridges for near‐field ground motions , 2003 .