Voxel-based morphometry in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive inclusions with and without progranulin mutations.

BACKGROUND Mutations in the progranulin gene (PGRN) have recently been identified as a cause of frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive inclusions (FTLD-U) in some families. OBJECTIVE To determine whether there is a difference in the patterns of atrophy in FTLD-U cases with and without PGRN mutations. DESIGN Case-control study. SETTING Brain bank of a tertiary care medical center. Patients Eight subjects who had screened positive for PGRN mutations (PGRN-positive) and who underwent volumetric magnetic resonance imaging were identified. Subjects were then matched by clinical diagnosis to a group of 8 subjects with a pathological diagnosis of FTLD-U who had screened negative for PGRN mutations (PGRN-negative). All subjects were then age-matched and sex-matched to a control subject. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Voxel-based morphometry was used to assess the patterns of gray matter atrophy in the PGRN-positive group compared with the PGRN-negative group and compared with controls. RESULTS The PGRN-positive group showed a widespread and severe pattern of gray matter loss predominantly affecting the frontal, temporal, and parietal lobes. The PGRN-negative group showed a less severe pattern of gray matter loss restricted mainly to the temporal and frontal lobes. On direct comparison, the PGRN-positive group showed greater gray matter loss in the frontal and parietal lobes compared with the PGRN-negative group. CONCLUSION Findings from this study suggest that PGRN mutations may be associated with a specific and severe pattern of cerebral atrophy in subjects with FTLD-U.

[1]  C. Jack,et al.  Imaging correlates of posterior cortical atrophy , 2007, Neurobiology of Aging.

[2]  R. Petersen,et al.  Neuropathologic Features of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration With Ubiquitin-Positive Inclusions With Progranulin Gene (PGRN) Mutations , 2007, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[3]  J. Hardy,et al.  Novel splicing mutation in the progranulin gene causing familial corticobasal syndrome. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  D. Neary,et al.  Progranulin gene mutations associated with frontotemporal dementia and progressive non-fluent aphasia. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  S. Melquist,et al.  Mutations in progranulin are a major cause of ubiquitin-positive frontotemporal lobar degeneration. , 2006, Human molecular genetics.

[6]  P. Pietrini,et al.  Characteristics of frontotemporal dementia patients with a Progranulin mutation , 2006, Annals of neurology.

[7]  J. Morris,et al.  HDDD2 is a familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin‐positive, tau‐negative inclusions caused by a missense mutation in the signal peptide of progranulin , 2006, Annals of neurology.

[8]  C. Duijn,et al.  Null mutations in progranulin cause ubiquitin-positive frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17q21 , 2006, Nature.

[9]  S. Melquist,et al.  Mutations in progranulin cause tau-negative frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17 , 2006, Nature.

[10]  C. Jack,et al.  P4-118 MRI correlates of the language and behavioral variants of frontotemporal dementia when both are characterized by ubiquitin-only immunoreactive changes , 2006, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[11]  Ronald C Petersen,et al.  Clinically undetected motor neuron disease in pathologically proven frontotemporal lobar degeneration with motor neuron disease. , 2006, Archives of neurology.

[12]  C. Jack,et al.  Frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism associated with the IVS1+1G->A mutation in progranulin: a clinicopathologic study. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  Joseph James Duffy,et al.  Clinicopathologic analysis of frontotemporal and corticobasal degenerations and PSP , 2006, Neurology.

[14]  C. Jack,et al.  Patterns of atrophy in pathologically confirmed FTLD with and without motor neuron degeneration , 2006, Neurology.

[15]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging signatures of tissue pathology in frontotemporal dementia. , 2005, Archives of neurology.

[16]  Clifford R. Jack,et al.  Comparison of different methodological implementations of voxel-based morphometry in neurodegenerative disease , 2005, NeuroImage.

[17]  K. Ishii,et al.  Voxel-based morphometric comparison between early- and late-onset mild Alzheimer's disease and assessment of diagnostic performance of z score images. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[18]  G. Frisoni,et al.  Structural correlates of early and late onset Alzheimer’s disease: voxel based morphometric study , 2004, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[19]  Irene Litvan,et al.  Corticobasal degeneration and its relationship to progressive supranuclear palsy and frontotemporal dementia , 2003, Annals of neurology.

[20]  M. Rossor,et al.  Familial and sporadic Alzheimer's disease , 2001 .

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods , 2000, NeuroImage.

[22]  R. Faber,et al.  Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. , 1999, Neurology.

[23]  M. Freedman,et al.  Frontotemporal lobar degeneration , 1998, Neurology.

[24]  K P Offord,et al.  A short test of mental status: description and preliminary results. , 1987, Mayo Clinic proceedings.