A study of the tactual and visual reception of fingerspelling.

A method of communication in frequent use among members of the deaf-blind community is the tactual reception of fingerspelling. In this method, the hand of the deaf-blind individual is placed on the hand of the sender to monitor the handshapes and movements associated with the letters of the manual alphabet. The purpose of the current study was to examine the ability of experienced deaf-blind subjects to receive fingerspelled materials, including sentences and connected text, through the tactual sense. A parallel study of the reception of fingerspelling through the visual sense was also conducted using sighted deaf subjects. For both visual and tactual reception of fingerspelled sentences, accuracy of reception was examined as a function of rate of presentation. In the tactual study, where rates were limited to those that could be produced naturally by an experienced interpreter, highly accurate reception of conversational sentence materials was observed throughout the range of naturally produced rates (i.e., 2 to 6 letters/s). In the visual study, rates in excess of those that can be produced naturally were achieved through variable-speed playback of videotapes of fingerspelled sentences. The results of this study indicate that performance varies systematically as a function of rate of presentation, with scores of 50% correct on conversational sentences obtained at rates of 12 to 16 letters/s (i.e., rates roughly double to triple normal speed). These results suggest that normal communication rates for the visual reception of fingerspelling are restricted by limitations on the rate of manual production. Although maximal rates of natural manual production of fingerspelling correspond to the presentation of a new handshape on the order of once every 150-20 ms, the data from the sped-up visual study suggest that experienced receivers of visual fingerspelling are able to receive sentences at substantially higher rates of fingerspelling (which are, in fact, comparable to communication rates for spoken English).

[1]  S D Fischer,et al.  Looking through phonological shape to lexical meaning: The bottleneck of non-native sign language processing , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[2]  C M Reed,et al.  Analytic study of the Tadoma method: identification of consonants and vowels by an experienced Tadoma user. , 1982, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  B L Scott,et al.  A method for training and evaluating the reception of ongoing speech. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  C M Reed,et al.  Preliminary results of speech-reception tests obtained with the synthetic Tadoma system. , 1988, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  C M Reed,et al.  Analytic study of the Tadoma method: effects of hand position on segmental speech perception. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[6]  W. M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Analytic study of the Tadoma method: background and preliminary results. , 1977, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  U. Bellugi,et al.  A comparison of sign language and spoken language , 1972 .

[8]  C M Reed,et al.  Analytic study of the Tadoma method: further experiments with inexperienced observers. , 1982, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[9]  C M Reed,et al.  Analytic study of the Tadoma method: discrimination ability of untrained observers. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  Ursula Bellugi,et al.  Remembering in signs , 1975, Cognition.

[11]  C M Reed,et al.  Research on the Tadoma method of speech communication. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  V. L. Hanson Use of orthographic structure by deaf adults: Recognition of fingerspelled words , 1982, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[13]  C. Chomsky,et al.  Analytic study of the Tadoma method: language abilities of three deaf-blind subjects. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  Emerson Foulke,et al.  Transmission of Morse Code by Electrocutaneous Stimulation , 1968 .

[15]  Charlotte M. Reed,et al.  Research on Tactual Communication of Speech: Ideas, Issues, and Findings. , 1989 .

[16]  F A GELDARD,et al.  Some neglected possibilities of communication. , 1960, Science.

[17]  Lowe Bryan William,et al.  Studies on the telegraphic language: The acquisition of a hierarchy of habits. , 1899 .

[18]  N I Durlach,et al.  Analysis of a synthetic Tadoma system as a multidimensional tactile display. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  M. Picheny,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[20]  S. R. Silverman,et al.  Hearing and deafness , 1970 .

[21]  F. A. Geldard Adventures in tactile literacy. , 1957 .