Visual field biases for near and far stimuli in disparity selective columns in human visual cortex

ABSTRACT When visual objects are located in the lower visual field, human observers perceive objects to be nearer than their real physical location. Conversely, objects in the upper visual field are viewed farther than their physical location. This bias may be linked to the statistics of natural scenes, and perhaps the ecological relevance of objects in the upper and lower visual fields (Previc, 1990; Yang and Purves, 2003). However, the neural mechanisms underlying such perceptual distortions have remained unknown. To test for underlying brain mechanisms, we presented visual stimuli at different perceptual distances, while measuring high‐resolution fMRI in human subjects. First, we localized disparity‐selective thick stripes and thick‐type columns in secondary and third visual cortical areas, respectively. Consistent with the perceptual bias, we found that the thick stripe/columns that represent the lower visual field also responded more selectively to near rather than far visual stimuli. Conversely, thick stripe/columns that represent the upper visual field show a complementary bias, i.e. selectively higher activity to far rather than near stimuli. Thus, the statistics of natural scenes may play a significant role in the organization of near‐ and far‐selective neurons within V2 thick stripes and V3 thick‐type columns. HIGHLIGHTSWithin human visual cortex, preferential responses to near vs. far stimuli are organized within thick stripes and thick‐type columns in V2 and V3, respectively.near' and ‘far’ clusters are preferentially located in the retinotopic representation of the lower and upper visual fields, respectively.This heterogeneous distribution is consistent with a known perceptual bias which ‘exaggerates’ the perception of near and far distances in lower vs. upper visual fields, respectively.

[1]  C. Furmanski,et al.  An oblique effect in human primary visual cortex , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  B. Breitmeyer,et al.  Existence and Implications of a Tilted Binocular Disparity Space , 1977, Perception.

[3]  D. L. Adams,et al.  Functional organization of macaque V3 for stereoscopic depth. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Claudine Joëlle Gauthier,et al.  Cortical lamina-dependent blood volume changes in human brain at 7T , 2015, NeuroImage.

[5]  D. Finlay,et al.  Detection threshold differences to crossed and uncrossed disparities , 1987, Vision Research.

[6]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Stereopsis Activates V3A and Caudal Intraparietal Areas in Macaques and Humans , 2003, Neuron.

[7]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  High-field fMRI unveils orientation columns in humans , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multisubject fMRI Studies and Conjunction Analyses , 1999, NeuroImage.

[9]  G. Poggio,et al.  Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon , 2001, Nature.

[11]  V. Mountcastle The columnar organization of the neocortex. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  R. Tootell,et al.  Functional anatomy of the second visual area (V2) in the macaque , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  Takahiro Doi,et al.  Disparity-tuning characteristics of neuronal responses to dynamic random-dot stereograms in macaque visual area V4. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Scene-Selective Cortical Regions in Human and Nonhuman Primates , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Anna W. Roe,et al.  A Map for Horizontal Disparity in Monkey V2 , 2008, Neuron.

[16]  R. Goebel,et al.  Cortical Depth Dependent Functional Responses in Humans at 7T: Improved Specificity with 3D GRASE , 2013, PloS one.

[17]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Human Ocular Dominance Columns as Revealed by High-Field Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2001, Neuron.

[18]  B. Julesz,et al.  Dynamic random-dot stereograms reveal up-down anisotropy and left-right isotropy between cortical hemifields , 1975, Science.

[19]  J. Philbeck,et al.  Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Kang Cheng,et al.  Recent progress in high-resolution functional MRI. , 2011, Current opinion in neurology.

[21]  Keiji Tanaka Columns for complex visual object features in the inferotemporal cortex: clustering of cells with similar but slightly different stimulus selectivities. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[23]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[24]  A. Dale,et al.  Whole Brain Segmentation Automated Labeling of Neuroanatomical Structures in the Human Brain , 2002, Neuron.

[25]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[26]  B. Keil,et al.  Design Optimization of a 32-Channel Head Coil at 7 T , 2009 .

[27]  Hans Wallach,et al.  Slope of regard as a distance cue , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[29]  B. Julesz,et al.  Binocular-Disparity-Dependent Upper—Lower Hemifield Anisotropy and Left—Right Hemifield Isotropy as Revealed by Dynamic Random-Dot Stereograms , 1976, Perception.

[30]  G. Glover,et al.  Retinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Representation of Visual Features of Objects in the Inferotemporal Cortex , 1996, Neural Networks.

[32]  Roger B. H. Tootell,et al.  A Cardinal Orientation Bias in Scene-Selective Visual Cortex , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Lawrence L. Wald,et al.  Laminar analysis of 7T BOLD using an imposed spatial activation pattern in human V1 , 2010, NeuroImage.

[34]  Thorsten Feiweier,et al.  Reducing sensitivity losses due to respiration and motion in accelerated echo planar imaging by reordering the autocalibration data acquisition , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  R. Turner,et al.  Recent Advances in High-Resolution MR Application and Its Implications for Neurovascular Coupling Research , 2010, Front. Neuroenerg..

[36]  F. Previc Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[37]  D. Field,et al.  Natural image statistics and efficient coding. , 1996, Network.

[38]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[39]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  Robust detection of ocular dominance columns in humans using Hahn Spin Echo BOLD functional MRI at 7 Tesla , 2007, NeuroImage.

[40]  J. Kaas,et al.  Cortical connections of areas 17 (V‐I) and 18 (V‐II) of squirrels , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[41]  R. Tootell,et al.  Thinking Outside the Box: Rectilinear Shapes Selectively Activate Scene-Selective Cortex , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Holly Bridge,et al.  Neural modulation by binocular disparity greatest in human dorsal visual stream. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  Retinotopic mapping with spin echo BOLD at 7T. , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[44]  Shahin Nasr,et al.  Interdigitated Color- and Disparity-Selective Columns within Human Visual Cortical Areas V2 and V3 , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Coding of Stereoscopic Depth Information in Visual Areas V3 and V3A , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  B. Cumming,et al.  Macaque V2 Neurons, But Not V1 Neurons, Show Choice-Related Activity , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  Frank H. Durgin,et al.  Distance Perception and the Visual Horizon in Head-Mounted Displays , 2005, TAP.

[48]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[49]  A. Asenov,et al.  Where Do the Dopants Go? , 2005, Science.

[50]  R. Goebel,et al.  Mapping the Organization of Axis of Motion Selective Features in Human Area MT Using High-Field fMRI , 2011, PloS one.

[51]  H. Duvernoy,et al.  The vascularization of the human cerebellar cortex , 1983, Brain Research Bulletin.

[52]  B. Julesz Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[53]  A. Parker,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the responses of V1 neurons to horizontal disparity in dynamic random-dot stereograms. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[54]  Denis Schluppeck,et al.  7 Tesla fMRI Reveals Systematic Functional Organization for Binocular Disparity in Dorsal Visual Cortex , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  B. Cumming,et al.  Psychophysically measured task strategy for disparity discrimination is reflected in V2 neurons , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[56]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Cortical connections of areas V3 and VP of macaque monkey extrastriate visual cortex , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[57]  G. Orban,et al.  The influence of eccentricity on receptive field types and orientation selectivity in areas 17 and 18 of the cat , 1981, Brain Research.

[58]  Dale Purves,et al.  A statistical explanation of visual space , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[59]  MessingRoss,et al.  Distance Perception and the Visual Horizon in Head-Mounted Displays , 2005 .

[60]  Bevil R. Conway,et al.  Receptive Fields of Disparity-Tuned Simple Cells in Macaque V1 , 2003, Neuron.