暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] B. J. Weiner,et al. accepted to the Astrophysical Journal Preprint typeset using L ATEX style emulateapj v. 10/09/06 THE EVOLUTION OF GALAXY MERGERS AND MORPHOLOGY AT Z < 1.2 IN THE EXTENDED GROTH STRIP , 2007 .
[2] Matthew A. Bershady,et al. The asymmetry of galaxies: physical morphology for nearby and high redshift galaxies , 1999 .
[3] S. P. Littlefair,et al. THE ASTROPY PROJECT: BUILDING AN INCLUSIVE, OPEN-SCIENCE PROJECT AND STATUS OF THE V2.0 CORE PACKAGE , 2018 .
[4] Andrew A. West,et al. Evolution of the Bar Fraction in COSMOS: Quantifying the Assembly of the Hubble Sequence , 2007, 0710.4552.
[5] Mattia Fumagalli,et al. THE 3D-HST SURVEY: HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE WFC3/G141 GRISM SPECTRA, REDSHIFTS, AND EMISSION LINE MEASUREMENTS FOR ∼100,000 GALAXIES , 2015, 1510.02106.
[6] Jimmy Ba,et al. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.
[7] Teng Liu,et al. Morphology Dependence of Stellar Age in Quenched Galaxies at Redshift ∼1.2:Massive Compact Galaxies Are Older than More Extended Ones , 2016, 1607.06089.
[8] Eduardo Serrano,et al. LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products , 2008, The Astrophysical Journal.
[9] Sander Dieleman,et al. Rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for galaxy morphology prediction , 2015, ArXiv.
[10] Mattia Fumagalli,et al. THE STRUCTURAL EVOLUTION OF MILKY-WAY-LIKE STAR-FORMING GALAXIES SINCE z ∼ 1.3 , 2013, 1304.2395.
[11] Stefano Casertano,et al. CANDELS: THE COSMIC ASSEMBLY NEAR-INFRARED DEEP EXTRAGALACTIC LEGACY SURVEY—THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS, IMAGING DATA PRODUCTS, AND MOSAICS , 2011, 1105.3754.
[12] J. Newman,et al. Galaxy formation and evolution science in the era of the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope , 2019, Nature Reviews Physics.
[13] Awad Aubad,et al. Towards a framework building for social systems modelling , 2020 .
[14] Neil Davey,et al. An automatic taxonomy of galaxy morphology using unsupervised machine learning , 2017, 1709.05834.
[15] Ralf Bender,et al. THE SLOPE OF THE BLACK HOLE MASS VERSUS VELOCITY DISPERSION CORRELATION , 2002, astro-ph/0203468.
[16] Stijn Wuyts,et al. WHAT TURNS GALAXIES OFF? THE DIFFERENT MORPHOLOGIES OF STAR-FORMING AND QUIESCENT GALAXIES SINCE z ∼ 2 FROM CANDELS , 2011, 1110.3786.
[17] John D. Hunter,et al. Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.
[18] Kirpal Nandra,et al. CANDELS: CONSTRAINING THE AGN–MERGER CONNECTION WITH HOST MORPHOLOGIES AT z ∼ 2 , 2011, 1109.2588.
[19] Marijn Franx,et al. THE SIZE EVOLUTION OF GALAXIES SINCE Z ∼ 3: COMBINING SDSS, GEMS AND FIRES 1 , 2006 .
[20] John E. Krist,et al. 20 years of Hubble Space Telescope optical modeling using Tiny Tim , 2011 .
[21] Masami Ouchi,et al. MORPHOLOGIES OF ∼190,000 GALAXIES AT z = 0–10 REVEALED WITH HST LEGACY DATA. I. SIZE EVOLUTION , 2015, 1503.07481.
[22] Donald W. Sweeney,et al. LSST Science Book, Version 2.0 , 2009, 0912.0201.
[23] Sugata Kaviraj,et al. Galaxy Zoo: Major Galaxy Mergers Are Not a Significant Quenching Pathway , 2017, 1708.00866.
[24] P. Madau,et al. A NEW NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH TO GALAXY MORPHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION , 2003, astro-ph/0311352.
[25] Thomas Brox,et al. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.
[26] Michael J. Smith,et al. Generative deep fields: arbitrarily sized, random synthetic astronomical images through deep learning , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[27] Gregory F. Snyder,et al. Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Galaxies Science Roadmap , 2017 .
[28] C. Conselice,et al. Mass assembly and morphological transformations since z ∼ 3 from CANDELS , 2016, 1606.04952.
[29] M. Huertas-Company,et al. Deep Learning Identifies High-z Galaxies in a Central Blue Nugget Phase in a Characteristic Mass Range , 2018, 1804.07307.
[30] R. Bender,et al. Dynamically hot galaxies. I - Structural properties , 1992 .
[31] Guido Rossum,et al. Python Reference Manual , 2000 .
[32] Annalisa Pillepich,et al. The Hubble Sequence at z ∼ 0 in the IllustrisTNG simulation with deep learning , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[33] Maria Wimmer,et al. Fully Convolutional Architectures for Multiclass Segmentation in Chest Radiographs , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[34] Kyle W. Willett,et al. Integrating human and machine intelligence in galaxy morphology classification tasks , 2018, 1802.08713.
[35] Puragra Guhathakurta,et al. The DEEP3 Galaxy Redshift Survey: the impact of environment on the size evolution of massive early-type galaxies at intermediate redshift , 2011, 1109.5698.
[36] Joel R. Primack,et al. The formation of bulges, discs and two-component galaxies in the CANDELS Survey at z < 3 , 2016, 1606.07405.
[37] C. Lintott,et al. Galaxy Zoo:CANDELS barred discs and bar fractions , 2014, 1409.1214.
[38] Marijn Franx,et al. The Hubble Legacy Fields (HLF-GOODS-S) v1.5 Data Products: Combining 2442 Orbits of GOODS-S/CDF-S Region ACS and WFC3/IR Images , 2016 .
[39] Takashi Ichikawa,et al. THE EVOLUTION OF GALAXY SIZE AND MORPHOLOGY AT z ∼ 0.5–3.0 IN THE GOODS-N REGION WITH HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE/WFC3 DATA , 2014, 1402.5752.
[40] M. S. Roberts,et al. Physical Parameters Along the Hubble Sequence , 1994 .
[41] Sergey Ioffe,et al. Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift , 2015, ICML.
[42] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.
[43] J. Trump,et al. CANDELS VISUAL CLASSIFICATIONS: SCHEME, DATA RELEASE, AND FIRST RESULTS , 2014, 1401.2455.
[44] Martín Abadi,et al. TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems , 2016, ArXiv.
[45] Konrad Kuijken,et al. THE LUMINOSITY-SIZE AND MASS-SIZE RELATIONS OF GALAXIES OUT TO z ~ 3 , 2004 .
[46] Mari Kawakatsu,et al. MORPHOLOGY AND THE COLOR–MASS DIAGRAM AS CLUES TO GALAXY EVOLUTION AT z ∼ 1 , 2017, 1701.04716.
[47] E. Bertin,et al. SExtractor: Software for source extraction , 1996 .
[48] Patrick Putzky,et al. Analyzing interferometric observations of strong gravitational lenses with recurrent and convolutional neural networks , 2018, 1808.00011.
[49] S. Ravindranath,et al. CANDELS: THE COSMIC ASSEMBLY NEAR-INFRARED DEEP EXTRAGALACTIC LEGACY SURVEY—THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS, IMAGING DATA PRODUCTS, AND MOSAICS , 2011, 1105.3753.
[50] Marc Huertas-Company,et al. A catalog of polychromatic bulge-disc decompositions of ∼17.600 galaxies in CANDELS , 2018, 1803.10234.
[51] Shannon G. Patel,et al. 3D-HST WFC3-SELECTED PHOTOMETRIC CATALOGS IN THE FIVE CANDELS/3D-HST FIELDS: PHOTOMETRY, PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFTS, AND STELLAR MASSES , 2014, 1403.3689.
[52] Laurence Perreault Levasseur,et al. Fast automated analysis of strong gravitational lenses with convolutional neural networks , 2017, Nature.
[53] Bruce G. Elmegreen,et al. Galaxy Morphologies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field: Dominance of Linear Structures at the Detection Limit , 2005 .
[54] Gilles Bertrand,et al. Topological gray-scale watershed transformation , 1997, Optics & Photonics.
[55] R. Nichol,et al. The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy - an overview , 2016, 1601.00329.
[56] E. Decenciere,et al. Deep learning for galaxy surface brightness profile fitting , 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[57] C. Lintott,et al. Galaxy Zoo: morphological classifications for 120 000 galaxies in HST legacy imaging , 2016, 1610.03068.
[58] Jason Rhodes,et al. Scientific Synergy between LSST and Euclid , 2017, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.
[59] R. C. Smith,et al. A catalogue of structural and morphological measurements for DES Y1 , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[60] C. Lintott,et al. Galaxy Zoo 2: detailed morphological classifications for 304,122 galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2013, 1308.3496.
[61] V. A. Bruce,et al. The bulge-disc decomposition of AGN host galaxies , 2015, 1510.03870.
[62] Marijn Franx,et al. Structure and Star Formation in Galaxies out to z = 3: Evidence for Surface Density Dependent Evolution and Upsizing , 2008, 0808.2642.
[63] Richard Hans Robert Hahnloser,et al. Digital selection and analogue amplification coexist in a cortex-inspired silicon circuit , 2000, Nature.
[64] R. Nichol,et al. Euclid Definition Study Report , 2011, 1110.3193.
[65] Michael S. Bernstein,et al. ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge , 2014, International Journal of Computer Vision.
[66] D. Gerdes,et al. Transfer learning for galaxy morphology from one survey to another , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[67] M. Franx,et al. Hubble Space Telescope and Spitzer Imaging of Red and Blue Galaxies at z ~ 2.5: A Correlation between Size and Star Formation Activity from Compact Quiescent Galaxies to Extended Star-forming Galaxies , 2007, 0707.4484.
[68] Yarin Gal,et al. Galaxy Zoo: Probabilistic Morphology through Bayesian CNNs and Active Learning , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[69] Guillermo Barro,et al. The Isophotal Structure of Star-forming Galaxies at 0.5 < z < 1.8 in CANDELS: Implications for the Evolution of Galaxy Structure , 2018, 1802.07930.
[70] B. C. Kelly,et al. MORPHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF GALAXIES BY SHAPELET DECOMPOSITION IN THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY. II. MULTIWAVELENGTH CLASSIFICATION , 2005 .
[71] Xiaopan Zhu,et al. Galaxy morphology classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2018, Astrophysics and Space Science.
[72] Chien Y. Peng,et al. STRUCTURAL PARAMETERS OF GALAXIES IN CANDELS , 2012, 1211.6954.
[73] Kirpal Nandra,et al. CANDELS MULTI-WAVELENGTH CATALOGS: SOURCE DETECTION AND PHOTOMETRY IN THE GOODS-SOUTH FIELD , 2013, 1308.4405.
[74] R. Abraham,et al. The Morphological Evolution of Galaxies , 2001, Science.
[75] Ben Forrest,et al. Effect of Local Environment and Stellar Mass on Galaxy Quenching and Morphology at 0.5 < z < 2.0 , 2017, 1706.03780.
[76] Jeffrey Kruk,et al. Photometric Redshift Calibration Requirements for WFIRST Weak-lensing Cosmology: Predictions from CANDELS , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.
[77] Ray M. Sharples,et al. A Catalog of Morphological Types in 10 Distant Rich Clusters of Galaxies , 1996, astro-ph/9611210.
[78] Chris J. Willott,et al. The JWST Extragalactic Mock Catalog: Modeling Galaxy Populations from the UV through the Near-IR over 13 Billion Years of Cosmic History , 2018, 1802.05272.
[79] Roberto E. Gonz'alez,et al. Galaxy detection and identification using deep learning and data augmentation , 2018, Astron. Comput..
[80] R. Davies,et al. Spectroscopy and photometry of elliptical galaxies. I: a new distance estimator , 1987 .
[81] Henry C. Ferguson,et al. CANDELS: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN GALAXY MORPHOLOGY AND STAR FORMATION ACTIVITY AT z ∼ 2 , 2013, 1306.4980.
[82] H. Rix,et al. The James Webb Space Telescope , 2006, astro-ph/0606175.
[83] Lin Lin,et al. The evolution of galaxy shapes in CANDELS: from prolate to discy , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[84] G. Vaucouleurs. Classification and Morphology of External Galaxies , 1959 .
[85] Sébastien Ourselin,et al. Generalised Dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentations , 2017, DLMIA/ML-CDS@MICCAI.
[86] Mariska Kriek,et al. THE RELATION BETWEEN GALAXY STRUCTURE AND SPECTRAL TYPE: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE BUILDUP OF THE QUIESCENT GALAXY POPULATION AT 0.5 < z < 2.0 , 2016, 1601.02629.
[87] C. J. Conselice,et al. Major mergers are not significant drivers of star formation or morphological transformation around the epoch of peak cosmic star formation , 2016, 1608.03892.
[88] Marijn Franx,et al. TIGHT CORRELATIONS BETWEEN MASSIVE GALAXY STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES AND DYNAMICS: THE MASS FUNDAMENTAL PLANE WAS IN PLACE BY z ∼ 2 , 2013, 1309.6638.
[89] Karl Glazebrook,et al. The Size Evolution of Star-forming Galaxies since z ∼ 7 Using ZFOURGE , 2016, 1612.05262.
[90] N. R. Tanvir,et al. Galaxy morphology to I = 25 mag in the Hubble Deep Field , 1996 .
[91] M. Franx,et al. NICMOS Imaging of DRGs in the HDF-S: A Relation between Star Formation and Size at z ~ 2.5 , 2006 .
[92] H. Rix,et al. GALAXY STRUCTURE AS A DRIVER OF THE STAR FORMATION SEQUENCE SLOPE AND SCATTER , 2015, 1508.04771.
[93] A. K. Inoue,et al. The Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey: Overview and Survey Design , 2017, 1704.05858.
[94] A. Dressler. Galaxy morphology in rich clusters: Implications for the formation and evolution of galaxies , 1980 .
[95] Francisco Valdes,et al. The Morphologies of Distant Galaxies. I. an Automated Classification System , 1994 .
[96] Wolfgang Voges,et al. The size distribution of galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2003, astro-ph/0301527.
[97] Emmanuelle Gouillart,et al. scikit-image: image processing in Python , 2014, PeerJ.
[98] Christopher J. Conselice,et al. The Relationship between Stellar Light Distributions of Galaxies and Their Formation Histories , 2003 .
[99]
M. Cirasuolo,et al.
The Morphologies of Massive Galaxies at 1
[100] Chien Y. Peng,et al. DETAILED DECOMPOSITION OF GALAXY IMAGES. II. BEYOND AXISYMMETRIC MODELS , 2009, 0912.0731.
[101] Brandon C. Kelly,et al. Morphological Classification of Galaxies by Shapelet Decomposition in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2004 .
[102] D. Wake,et al. 3D-HST+CANDELS: THE EVOLUTION OF THE GALAXY SIZE–MASS DISTRIBUTION SINCE z = 3 , 2014, 1404.2844.
[103] Sugata Kaviraj,et al. Galaxy Zoo: the dependence of the star formation–stellar mass relation on spiral disc morphology , 2015, 1502.03444.
[104] Seyed-Ahmad Ahmadi,et al. V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation , 2016, 2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV).
[105] Max Welling,et al. Data-driven Reconstruction of Gravitationally Lensed Galaxies Using Recurrent Inference Machines , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[106] Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al. Multi-column deep neural networks for image classification , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[107] S. Djorgovski,et al. Fundamental Properties of Elliptical Galaxies , 1987 .
[108] Marc Huertas-Company,et al. Photometry of high-redshift blended galaxies using deep learning , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[109] Adam O. Kalinich,et al. MAPPING THE GALAXY COLOR–REDSHIFT RELATION: OPTIMAL PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFT CALIBRATION STRATEGIES FOR COSMOLOGY SURVEYS , 2015, 1509.03318.
[110] C. Lintott,et al. Galaxy Zoo: Quantitative visual morphological classifications for 48 000 galaxies from CANDELS , 2016, 1610.03070.
[111] Miguel de Val-Borro,et al. The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.
[112] J. B. Oke,et al. Secondary standard stars for absolute spectrophotometry , 1983 .
[113] Pieter van Dokkum,et al. A New View of the Size–Mass Distribution of Galaxies: Using r20 and r80 Instead of r50 , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[114] C. Lintott,et al. Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2008, 0804.4483.
[115] A. Koekemoer,et al. GALAXY STRUCTURE AND MODE OF STAR FORMATION IN THE SFR–MASS PLANE FROM z ∼ 2.5 TO z ∼ 0.1 , 2011, 1107.0317.
[116] Gregory F. Snyder,et al. Beyond spheroids and discs: classifications of CANDELS galaxy structure at 1.4 < z < 2 via principal component analysis , 2015, 1504.01751.
[117] S. M. Fall,et al. The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope: 100 Hubbles for the 2020s , 2019, 1902.05569.
[118] Casey Papovich,et al. The Luminosity, Stellar Mass, and Number Density Evolution of Field Galaxies of Known Morphology from z = 0.5 to 3 , 2004, astro-ph/0405001.
[119] Brandon C. Kelly,et al. Data mining for gravitationally lensed quasars , 2014, 1410.4565.
[120] John Kormendy,et al. Brightness distributions in compact and normal galaxies. II. Structure parameters of the spheroidal component. , 1977 .
[121] Jr.,et al. Evolution since z = 0.5 of the Morphology-Density Relation for Clusters of Galaxies , 1997, astro-ph/9707232.
[122] James Binney,et al. On the rotation of elliptical galaxies , 1978 .
[123] D. Wake,et al. THE GROWTH OF MASSIVE GALAXIES SINCE z = 2 , 2009, 0912.0514.
[124] Santiago,et al. A CATALOG OF VISUAL-LIKE MORPHOLOGIES IN THE 5 CANDELS FIELDS USING DEEP LEARNING , 2015, 1509.05429.
[125] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.