Real-Time Pricing in the Nordic Power Markets

In this paper we study the potential effects of Real-Time Pricing (RTP) of electricity on the need for long-run capacities in the Nordic Power markets. A characteristic of the Nordic Power market is the large variety of production technologies, of which hydro and nuclear power are capacity constrained. We analyze the impact of RTP on: the need for total, peak and midmerit capacities; total demand; prices; peak demand hours; and economic welfare. We have also studied whether the results of RTP are sensitive to the simultaneous implementation of tradable emission permits. We find that RTP diminishes the need for total capacity even with inelastic demand. Our results show that even with modest assumptions related to RTP participation, the annual midmerit and peaker capacity efficiency savings amount to 97million Euros, which are around 6% of their total annual investment costs. The price of the peak demand hour clearly diminishes as the share of the RTP customers increases or demand becomes more price elastic. We compare RTP and tradable emission permits as two separate instruments in reaching energy use efficiencies and show how these two instruments must be seen as complementary and not as substitutable instruments. We show how RTP and tradable emission permits have a positive correlation in promoting market access of renewable energy sources. We find that welfare effects of the implementation of RTP are positive.

[1]  Severin Borenstein Electricity pricing that reflects its real-time cost , 2009 .

[2]  S. Borenstein,et al.  Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California's Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market , 2002 .

[3]  T. Johnsen,et al.  Demand, generation and price in the Norwegian market for electric power , 2001 .

[4]  Douglas W. Caves,et al.  The Response of Industrial Customers to Electric Rates Based Upon Dynamic Marginal Costs , 1993 .

[5]  Severin Borenstein,et al.  Wealth Transfers Among Large Customers from Implementing Real-Time Retail Electricity Pricing , 2007 .

[6]  Customer Response to Real-Time Prices in the England and Wales Electricity Market: Implications for Demand-Side Bidding and Pricing Options Design Under Competition , 1999 .

[7]  E. Kahn,et al.  A quantitative analysis of pricing behavior in California's wholesale electricity market during summer 2000 , 2001, 2001 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37262).

[8]  S. Borenstein,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Potential for Market Power in California&Apos;S Electricity Industry , 1998 .

[9]  R. Tarjanne,et al.  Comparison of electricity generation costs , 2008 .

[10]  R. Tol,et al.  Europe's long-term climate target: A critical evaluation , 2005 .

[11]  Shana L. Dardan,et al.  INDUSTRIAL RESPONSE TO ELECTRICITY REAL‐TIME PRICES: SHORT RUN AND LONG RUN , 2002 .

[12]  Severin Borenstein,et al.  Customer Risk from Real-Time Retail Electricity Pricing: Bill Volatility and Hedgability , 2006 .

[13]  Ahmad Faruqui,et al.  The Power of Dynamic Pricing , 2009 .

[14]  O. Kauppi A model of imperfect dynamic competition in the Nordic power market , 2009 .

[15]  S. Borenstein The Long-Run Efficiency of Real-Time Electricity Pricing , 2005 .

[16]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  Assessing Emission Allocation in Europe: An Interactive Simulation Approach , 2005 .

[17]  H. Allcott,et al.  Rethinking Real Time Electricity Pricing , 2011 .