Comparative model analysis of the performance of tube fitted bulk monolithic catalyst with conventional pellet shapes for natural gas reforming

Abstract A novel catalyst shape for reforming reaction, as an intraparticle diffusion limited-reaction, using bulk monolithic catalyst (BMC), the so-called tube fitted bulk monolithic catalyst (TFBMC), instead of conventional pellets is presented. A detailed analysis of the transport phenomena and proper models are introduced. The model is applied for natural gas reforming reaction and validated using industrial data. Then comparative model analysis and comparison for packed bed rector using conventional pellet shapes and TFBMC is presented. The results indicate that the TFBMC has superior advantages over the conventional pellet shapes especially with regards to the pressure drop and effective usage of the catalyst. Thus, TFBMC offer smaller reactor volume for processing similar feed flow which in turn results in less capital cost and also energy saving in the course of operation. Moreover, the TFBMC concept may be easily adapted to the present fixed bed reactors which use conventional pellet catalysts resulting more productivity and better performance.

[1]  Andrzej Stankiewicz,et al.  Process intensification in in-line monolithic reactor , 2001 .

[2]  G. Groppi,et al.  'High conductivity' monolith catalysts for gas/solid exothermic reactions , 2002 .

[3]  G. Froment,et al.  Methane steam reforming: II. Diffusional limitations and reactor simulation , 1989 .

[4]  Lars J. Pettersson,et al.  Combined methanol reforming for hydrogen generation over monolithic catalysts , 2003 .

[5]  Achim Karl-Erich Heibel,et al.  Heat transfer in conductive monolith structures , 2005 .

[6]  Jungil Yang,et al.  Ni catalyst wash-coated on metal monolith with enhanced heat-transfer capability for steam reforming , 2007 .

[7]  Shinn Hwang,et al.  Monolithic structures as alternatives to particulate catalysts for the reforming of hydrocarbons for hydrogen generation , 2005 .

[8]  Guillermo F. Barreto,et al.  Effect of the geometric characteristics of commercial catalysts for steam reforming , 1988 .

[9]  Achim Karl-Erich Heibel,et al.  Monolithic Catalysts for the Chemical Industry , 2004 .

[10]  G. Froment,et al.  Methane steam reforming, methanation and water‐gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics , 1989 .

[11]  Moustafa A. Soliman,et al.  Digital simulation of industrial steam reformers for natural gas using heterogeneous models , 1992 .

[12]  Peter Lehner,et al.  Monoliths as multiphase reactors: A review , 2004 .

[13]  T. Boger,et al.  Monolithic Catalysts with High Thermal Conductivity for Improved Operation and Economics in the Production of Phthalic Anhydride , 2005 .

[14]  Ramon L. Cerro,et al.  Pressure drop in monolith reactors , 2001 .

[15]  J. Votruba,et al.  Heat and mass transfer in honeycomb catalysts—II , 1975 .

[16]  H. Ebrahimi,et al.  Software development for design and simulation of terraced wall and top fired primary steam reformers , 2008, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[17]  Enrico Tronconi,et al.  Design of novel monolith catalyst supports for gas/solid reactions with heat exchange , 2000 .

[18]  A. Zamaniyan,et al.  Catalyst Shape as a Design Parameter—Optimum Shape for Methane-Steam Reforming Catalyst , 2002 .

[19]  G. Groppi,et al.  Honeycomb supports with high thermal conductivity for gas/solid chemical processes , 2005 .

[20]  Hui Liu,et al.  Modeling of a metal monolith catalytic reactor for methane steam reforming–combustion coupling , 2007 .

[21]  Y. Mortazavi,et al.  Tube fitted bulk monolithic catalyst as novel structured reactor for gas–solid reactions , 2010 .

[22]  Hadi Ebrahimi,et al.  A unified model for top fired methane steam reformers using three-dimensional zonal analysis , 2008 .

[23]  H. S. Fogler,et al.  Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering , 1986 .

[24]  Suresh T. Gulati,et al.  The application of monoliths for gas phase catalytic reactions , 2001 .

[25]  Shudong Wang,et al.  Autothermal reforming of gasoline on Rh-based monolithic catalysts , 2007 .

[26]  Hary Devianto,et al.  The catalytic performance of Ni/MgSiO3 catalyst for methane steam reforming in operation of direct internal reforming MCFC , 2010 .

[27]  Gunther Kolb,et al.  Micro-structured reactors for gas phase reactions , 2004 .

[28]  Hadi Ebrahimi,et al.  Effect of design parameters on performance of a top fired natural gas reformer , 2008 .

[29]  G. Froment,et al.  Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design , 1979 .

[30]  Young‐Kwon Park,et al.  Extrusion of honeycomb monoliths employed with activated carbon-LDPE hybrid materials , 2010 .