Embryonic approach to the development of information systems

Abstract Prototyping in information systems (IS) development has recently shown increased benefits. In principle, the prototyping process provides users with more opportunities to improve their work, to verify that their needs are provided for, and that the terms used in the interface of the designed system are consistent with those in use in their work. As a result, they should be highly motivated to participate in an IS development process. However, certain drawbacks inherited from traditional prototyping in industrial production could limit the use of this approach in IS development. Some problems are identified in this paper, such as: (1) product-oriented thinking; (2) feedback delay; (3) the preoccupation of designers with respect to the experimental approach; (4) problems arising from the users' participation being indirect, and (5) negative attitudes towards contradiction. This paper proposes an organic approach, the ‘Embryonic Approach’ (EmA), in order to explore the full potentialities of prototyping in IS development. This approach is based on two fundamental elements; an adaptive and expandable kernel-structure, and a built-in communication mechanism.

[1]  Peter Weill,et al.  The Relationship Between Investment in Information Technology and Firm Performance: A Study of the Valve Manufacturing Sector , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Marian G. Williams,et al.  Translation between software designers and users , 1993, CACM.

[3]  David J. Miller,et al.  The structural and environmental correlates of business strategy , 1987 .

[4]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Apprenticing with the customer , 1995, CACM.

[5]  Vijay Sethi,et al.  Development of measures to assess the extent to which an information technology application provides competitive advantage , 1994 .

[6]  Kristo Ivanov,et al.  Hypersystems: A Base for Specification of Computer-Supported Self-Learning Social Systems , 1993 .

[7]  Donald A. Schön Designing: Rules, types and worlds , 1988 .

[8]  Douglas Schuler,et al.  Participatory Design: Principles and Practices , 1993 .

[9]  Peter Weill,et al.  Managing Investment in Information Technology: Mini Case Examples and Implications , 1989, MIS Q..

[10]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Information systems and organizational change , 1990, CACM.

[11]  David Miller Strategy Making and Structure: Analysis and Implications for Performance , 1987 .

[12]  Susan Harker User participation in prototyping , 1993, CACM.

[13]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  Supporting Active User Involvement in Prototyping , 1990, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[14]  William R. King,et al.  Organizational Characteristics and Information Systems Planning: An Empirical Study , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Karlheinz Kautz,et al.  Communication support for prototyping projects , 1993, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[16]  M. Kyng,et al.  Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge , 1987 .

[17]  Christiane Floyd,et al.  Outline of a Paradigm Change in Software Engineering , 1993 .

[18]  J. Ward,et al.  Strategic Planning for Information Systems , 1990 .

[19]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Erran Carmel,et al.  PD and joint application design: a transatlantic comparison , 1993, CACM.

[21]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Strategic orientation of business enterprises : the construct and its measurement , 1985 .

[22]  Anthony Morris,et al.  Activity Theory and the Analysis of Organizations , 1993 .

[23]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Making representations work , 1995, CACM.

[24]  M. K. D. Vries,et al.  Top Executive Locus of Control and Its Relationship to Strategy-Making, Structure, and Environment , 1982 .

[25]  Gro Bjerknes Dialectical Reflection in Information Systems Development , 1992, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[26]  C. Floyd A Systematic Look at Prototyping , 1984 .

[27]  Michael T. Sager,et al.  Competitive information systems in Australian retail banking , 1988, Inf. Manag..

[28]  Andrew Clement,et al.  A retrospective look at PD projects , 1993, CACM.

[29]  William R. King,et al.  The impact of information systems planning on the organization , 1988 .

[30]  William R. King,et al.  An Empirical Assessment of Information Systems Planning and the Role of Information Systems in Organizations , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  David G. Novick,et al.  Participatory conversation in PD , 1993, CACM.

[32]  Kari Kuutti,et al.  Identifying potential CSCW applications by means of activity theory concepts: a case example , 1992, CSCW '92.

[33]  Peter. Weill,et al.  Strategic Investment in Information Technology: An Empirical Study , 1990 .

[34]  Preben Mogensen,et al.  Towards a Provotyping Approach in Systems Development , 1992, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Bijan Fazlollahi,et al.  Adaptive decision support systems , 1997, Decis. Support Syst..

[36]  T. S. Ragu-Nathan,et al.  Research Report - Adaptation of a Planning System Success Model to Information Systems Planning , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  Henry Mintzberg Patterns in Strategy Formation , 1978, International Studies of Management & Organization.

[38]  Finn Kensing,et al.  PD: structure in the toolbox , 1993, CACM.