Effects of regional temperature on electric vehicle efficiency, range, and emissions in the United States.

We characterize the effect of regional temperature differences on battery electric vehicle (BEV) efficiency, range, and use-phase power plant CO2 emissions in the U.S. The efficiency of a BEV varies with ambient temperature due to battery efficiency and cabin climate control. We find that annual energy consumption of BEVs can increase by an average of 15% in the Upper Midwest or in the Southwest compared to the Pacific Coast due to temperature differences. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from BEVs vary primarily with marginal regional grid mix, which has three times the GHG intensity in the Upper Midwest as on the Pacific Coast. However, even within a grid region, BEV emissions vary by up to 22% due to spatial and temporal ambient temperature variation and its implications for vehicle efficiency and charging duration and timing. Cold climate regions also encounter days with substantial reduction in EV range: the average range of a Nissan Leaf on the coldest day of the year drops from 70 miles on the Pacific Coast to less than 45 miles in the Upper Midwest. These regional differences are large enough to affect adoption patterns and energy and environmental implications of BEVs relative to alternatives.

[1]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Will subsidies drive electric vehicle adoption? Measuring consumer preferences in the U.S. and China , 2015 .

[2]  Thomas H. Bradley,et al.  Geographical and temporal differences in electric vehicle range due to cabin conditioning energy consumption , 2015 .

[3]  Jeremy Neubauer,et al.  Thru-life impacts of driver aggression, climate, cabin thermal management, and battery thermal management on battery electric vehicle utility , 2014 .

[4]  Thomas H. Bradley,et al.  Estimating the HVAC energy consumption of plug-in electric vehicles , 2014 .

[5]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Influence of driving patterns on life cycle cost and emissions of hybrid and plug-in electric vehicle powertrains , 2013 .

[6]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Optimal design and allocation of electrified vehicles and dedicated charging infrastructure for minimum life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and cost , 2012 .

[7]  Matthew J. Kotchen,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity of Marginal Emissions: Implications for Electric Cars and Other Electricity-Shifting Policies , 2012 .

[8]  M Granger Morgan,et al.  Marginal emissions factors for the U.S. electricity system. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Christopher R. Knittel,et al.  Reducing Petroleum Consumption from Transportation , 2012 .

[10]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Valuation of plug-in vehicle life-cycle air emissions and oil displacement benefits , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Jay Apt,et al.  Net air emissions from electric vehicles: the effect of carbon price and charging strategies. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Robb A. Barnitt,et al.  Analysis of Off-Board Powered Thermal Preconditioning in Electric Drive Vehicles: Preprint , 2010 .

[13]  David Linden,et al.  Linden's Handbook of Batteries , 2010 .

[14]  Jonn Axsen,et al.  The Early U.S. Market for PHEVs: Anticipating Consumer Awareness, Recharge Potential, Design Priorities and Energy Impacts , 2008 .

[15]  S. Wilcox,et al.  Users Manual for TMY3 Data Sets (Revised) , 2008 .

[16]  Constantine Samaras,et al.  Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: implications for policy. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Kyle W Meisterling,et al.  Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: implications for policy. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Valerie H. Johnson,et al.  Fuel Used for Vehicle Air Conditioning: A State-by-State Thermal Comfort-Based Approach , 2002 .