Use of continuous quality improvement to increase use of process measures in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT A rigorous evaluation of continuous quality improvement (CQI) in medical practice has not been carried out on a national scale. OBJECTIVE To test whether low-intensity CQI interventions can be used to speed the national adoption of 2 coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery process-of-care measures: preoperative beta-blockade therapy and internal mammary artery (IMA) grafting in patients 75 years or older. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Three hundred fifty-nine academic and nonacademic hospitals (treating 267 917 patients using CABG surgery) participating in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Database between January 2000 and July 2002 were randomized to a control arm or to 1 of 2 groups that used CQI interventions designed to increase use of the process-of-care measures. INTERVENTION Each intervention group received measure-specific information, including a call to action to a physician leader; educational products; and periodic longitudinal, nationally benchmarked, site-specific feedback. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Differential incorporation of the targeted care processes into practice at the intervention sites vs the control sites, assessed by measuring preintervention (January-December 2000)/postintervention (January 2001-July 2002) site differences and by using a hierarchical patient-level analysis. RESULTS From January 2000 to July 2002, use of both process measures increased nationally (beta-blockade, 60.0%-65.6%; IMA grafting, 76.2%-82.8%). Use of beta-blockade increased significantly more at beta-blockade intervention sites (7.3% [SD, 12.8%]) vs control sites (3.6% [SD, 11.5%]) in the preintervention/postintervention (P =.04) and hierarchical analyses (P<.001). Use of IMA grafting also tended to increase at IMA intervention sites (8.7% [SD, 17.5%]) vs control sites (5.4% [SD,15.8%]) (P =.20 and P =.11 for preintervention/postintervention and hierarchical analyses, respectively). Both interventions tended to have more impact at lower-volume CABG sites (for interaction: P =.04 for beta-blockade; P =.02 for IMA grafting). CONCLUSIONS A multifaceted, physician-led, low-intensity CQI effort can improve the adoption of care processes into national practice within the context of a medical specialty society infrastructure.

[1]  R. E. Clark.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database status report. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  E. DeLong,et al.  Hospital variability in length of stay after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from the Society of Thoracic Surgeon's National Cardiac Database. , 2002, Annals of Thoracic Surgery.

[3]  J J Allison,et al.  Improving quality improvement using achievable benchmarks for physician feedback: a randomized controlled trial. , 2001, JAMA.

[4]  P. Pairolero,et al.  The STS National database : Current changes and challenges for the new millennium. Commentary , 2000 .

[5]  L. Goldman,et al.  Health and economic benefits of increased beta-blocker use following myocardial infarction. , 2000, JAMA.

[6]  E. Peterson,et al.  Preoperative beta-blocker use and mortality and morbidity following CABG surgery in North America. , 2002, JAMA.

[7]  G. Marshall,et al.  Impact of mammary grafts on coronary bypass operative mortality and morbidity. Department of Veterans Affairs Cardiac Surgeons. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[8]  K. Anstrom,et al.  Alabama coronary artery bypass grafting project: results of a statewide quality improvement initiative. , 2001, JAMA.

[9]  Robert Parrish,et al.  Improving quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: The Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) Initiative. , 2002, JAMA.

[10]  C A Marrin,et al.  A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. , 1996, JAMA.

[11]  D M Eddy,et al.  Performance measurement: problems and solutions. , 1998, Health affairs.

[12]  E. Hannan,et al.  Improving the Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in New York State , 1994 .

[13]  Diane P. Martin,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of CQI teams and academic detailing: can they alter compliance with guidelines? , 1998, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[14]  A. Kini,et al.  Cardioprotective effect of prior beta-blocker therapy in reducing creatine kinase-MB elevation after coronary intervention: benefit is extended to improvement in intermediate-term survival. , 2000, Circulation.

[15]  G. O'connor,et al.  Use of the Internal Mammary Artery Graft and In-Hospital Mortality and Other Adverse Outcomes Associated With Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery , 2001, Circulation.

[16]  W. Ghali,et al.  Statewide quality improvement initiatives and mortality after cardiac surgery. , 1997, JAMA.

[17]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Predictors of Cardiac Events After Major Vascular Surgery Role of Clinical Characteristics, Dobutamine Echocardiography, and b-Blocker Therapy , 2001 .

[18]  H. Krumholz,et al.  A qualitative study of increasing beta-blocker use after myocardial infarction: Why do some hospitals succeed? , 2001, JAMA.

[19]  R. E. Clark,et al.  Impact of internal mammary artery conduits on operative mortality in coronary revascularization. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[20]  R. Grol.  Improving the quality of medical care: building bridges among professional pride, payer profit, and patient satisfaction. , 2001, JAMA.

[21]  S. Jencks,et al.  Change in the quality of care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries, 1998-1999 to 2000-2001. , 2003, JAMA.

[22]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  A L Shroyer,et al.  A Decade’s Experience With Quality Improvement in Cardiac Surgery Using the Veterans Affairs and Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Databases , 2001, Annals of surgery.

[24]  S. Shortell,et al.  Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement on clinical practice: what it will take to accelerate progress. , 1998, The Milbank quarterly.

[25]  D. Berwick.  Disseminating innovations in health care. , 2003, JAMA.

[26]  D M Berwick,et al.  Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  A L Shroyer,et al.  The 1996 coronary artery bypass risk model: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac National Database. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[28]  E. Hannan,et al.  The decline in coronary artery bypass graft surgery mortality in New York State. The role of surgeon volume. , 1995, JAMA.

[29]  H. Krumholz,et al.  National use and effectiveness of beta-blockers for the treatment of elderly patients after acute myocardial infarction: National Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. , 1998, JAMA.

[30]  D Blumenthal,et al.  The case for using industrial quality management science in health care organizations. , 1989, JAMA.

[31]  M. Chassin,et al.  Achieving and sustaining improved quality: lessons from New York State and cardiac surgery. , 2002, Health affairs.

[32]  W. C. Sheldon,et al.  Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  A. Wallace,et al.  Effect of atenolol on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity after noncardiac surgery. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Randomized trial of an education and support intervention to prevent readmission of patients with heart failure. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[35]  E L Hannan,et al.  Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State. , 1994, JAMA.

[36]  W. Baumgartner,et al.  Routine use of the left internal mammary artery graft in the elderly. , 1990, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[37]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Improving the quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. , 1998, JAMA.

[38]  D. Hsia.  Medicare quality improvement: bad apples or bad systems? , 2003, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

[39]  S B Soumerai,et al.  Effect of local medical opinion leaders on quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial. , 1998, JAMA.

[40]  R. Littell.  SAS System for Mixed Models , 1996 .

[41]  K. Anstrom,et al.  Alabama coronary artery bypass grafting project: results of a statewide quality improvement initiative. , 2001, JAMA.

[42]  G. E. Green,et al.  Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery grafts--effects on survival over a 15-year period. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  L Goldman,et al.  Adverse Outcomes of Underuse of β-Blockers in Elderly Survivors of Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1997 .