Quantum Hamiltonian complexity and the detectability lemma

Quantum Hamiltonian complexity studies computational complexity aspects of local Hamiltonians and ground states; these questions can be viewed as generalizations of classical computational complexity problems related to local constraint satisfaction (such as SAT), with the additional ingredient of multi-particle entanglement. This additional ingredient of course makes generalizations of celebrated theorems such as the PCP theorem from classical to the quantum domain highly non-trivial; it also raises entirely new questions such as bounds on entanglement and correlations in ground states, and in particular area laws. We propose a simple combinatorial tool that helps to handle such questions: it is a simplified, yet more general version of the detectability lemma introduced by us in the more restricted context on quantum gap amplification a year ago. Here, we argue that this lemma is applicable in much more general contexts. We use it to provide a simplified and more combinatorial proof of Hastings' 1D area law, together with a less than 1 page proof of the decay of correlations in gapped local Hamiltonian systems in any constant dimension. We explain how the detectability lemma can replace the Lieb-Robinson bound in various other contexts, and argue that it constitutes a basic tool for the study of local Hamiltonians and their ground states in relation to various questions in quantum Hamiltonian complexity.

[1]  M. B. Hastings,et al.  Locality in Quantum Systems , 2010, 1008.5137.

[2]  Avinatan Hassidim,et al.  Quantum state restoration and single-copy tomography for ground states of Hamiltonians. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[3]  F. Verstraete,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum-state engineering driven by dissipation , 2009 .

[4]  Umesh V. Vazirani,et al.  The detectability lemma and quantum gap amplification , 2008, STOC '09.

[5]  Avinatan Hassidim,et al.  Quantum state restoration and single-copy tomography , 2009 .

[6]  C. Badea,et al.  A generalization of the Friedrichs angle and the method of alternating projections , 2009 .

[7]  M. Hastings,et al.  An area law for one-dimensional quantum systems , 2007, 0705.2024.

[8]  M. B. Hastings Entropy and entanglement in quantum ground states , 2007 .

[9]  G. Vidal Entanglement renormalization. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[10]  Irit Dinur,et al.  The PCP theorem by gap amplification , 2006, STOC.

[11]  G. Vidal,et al.  Classical simulation of quantum many-body systems with a tree tensor network , 2005, quant-ph/0511070.

[12]  D Porras,et al.  Density matrix renormalization group and periodic boundary conditions: a quantum information perspective. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[13]  F. Verstraete,et al.  Renormalization algorithms for Quantum-Many Body Systems in two and higher dimensions , 2004, cond-mat/0407066.

[14]  G. Vidal Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quantum many-body systems. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[15]  M. Hastings Lieb-Schultz-Mattis in higher dimensions , 2003, cond-mat/0305505.

[16]  A. Kitaev,et al.  Fault tolerant quantum computation by anyons , 1997, quant-ph/9707021.

[17]  S. Rommer,et al.  CLASS OF ANSATZ WAVE FUNCTIONS FOR ONE-DIMENSIONAL SPIN SYSTEMS AND THEIR RELATION TO THE DENSITY MATRIX RENORMALIZATION GROUP , 1997 .

[18]  Östlund,et al.  Thermodynamic limit of density matrix renormalization. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[19]  Kennedy,et al.  Rigorous results on valence-bond ground states in antiferromagnets. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[20]  A. Uhlmann Relative entropy and the Wigner-Yanase-Dyson-Lieb concavity in an interpolation theory , 1977 .

[21]  G. Lindblad Completely positive maps and entropy inequalities , 1975 .

[22]  D. W. Robinson,et al.  The finite group velocity of quantum spin systems , 1972 .

[23]  John von Neumann,et al.  The geometry of orthogonal spaces , 1950 .

[24]  C. Eckart,et al.  The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank , 1936 .