Umbilical deployment modeling for tethered UAV detecting oil pollution from ship

Abstract Oil slick detection and guiding of oil recovery ship by using on board tethered UAV need a non-linear dynamic model for the aerial umbilical including variable length domain and material elasticity. Considering the flight phases constraints and the system definition, two continuous models are presented using a Lagrangian approach or an updated Lagrangian one, both including different kinds of boundary condition at the umbilical bottom end. At the winch position, during a take-off or landing (TOL) phase flight, a geometrical singularity occurs in the Lagrangian approach while in the updated Lagrangian one, a difference exists between the unstrained curvilinear coordinate velocity and the strained umbilical material point velocity. Properties of internal strain energy and non-linear strain measure permit to characterize the regularity of the longitudinal and transversal umbilical displacements. From the continuous models we deduce the discrete finite-element models. Numerical examples with until eleven nodes are given, including the case of an emergency flight phase. Applications of this captive aerial detection system are equally discussed.

[1]  N. Robbe,et al.  Remote sensing of marine oil spills from airborne platforms using multi-sensor systems , 2006 .

[2]  J. Garratt Review of Drag Coefficients over Oceans and Continents , 1977 .

[3]  V. N. Do,et al.  Deployment control of a cable connecting a ship to an underwater vehicle , 1995 .

[4]  Christopher D. Rahn,et al.  Response of a Tethered Aerostat to Simulated Turbulence , 2006 .

[5]  C Katz,et al.  Oil Spill Response Technology Initiation Decision Report to the Pollution Abatement Ashore Program , 2007 .

[6]  M. Fingas,et al.  Review of oil spill remote sensing. , 2014, Marine pollution bulletin.

[7]  Asgeir J. Sørensen,et al.  FEM modelling and automatic control for collision prevention of top tensioned risers , 2008 .

[8]  In Lee,et al.  Analysis of Tethered Aerostat Response Under Atmospheric Turbulence Considering Nonlinear Cable Dynamics , 2009 .

[9]  S. Chucheepsakul,et al.  Applications of Lie Group Analysis to the Equations of Motion of Inclined Unsagged Cables , 2008 .

[10]  Thierry Coupez,et al.  Lagrangian finite‐element analysis of time‐dependent viscous free‐surface flow using an automatic remeshing technique: Application to metal casting flow , 1993 .

[11]  C. Fabre,et al.  A modelling of springing, whipping and slamming for ships , 2008 .

[12]  Sergey Khantsis,et al.  UAV Controller Design Using Evolutionary Algorithms , 2005, Australian Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

[13]  Tarek Hamel,et al.  Nonlinear attitude and gyroscope's bias estimation for a VTOL UAV , 2007, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[14]  Ronald L. Huston,et al.  Multibody Dynamics Modeling of Variable Length Cable Systems , 2001 .

[15]  S. Prabhakar,et al.  Dynamics modeling and control of a variable length remotely operated vehicle tether , 2005, Proceedings of OCEANS 2005 MTS/IEEE.

[16]  B. Buckham,et al.  Development of a Finite Element Cable Model for Use in Low-Tension Dynamics Simulation , 2004 .