Cooperative Relay Service in a Wireless LAN

As a family of wireless local area network (WLAN) protocols between physical layer and higher layer protocols, IEEE 802.11 has to accommodate the features and requirements of both ends. However, current practice has addressed the problems of these two layers separately and is far from satisfactory. On one end, due to varying channel conditions, WLANs have to provide multiple physical channel rates to support various signal qualities. A low channel rate station not only suffers low throughput, but also significantly degrades the throughput of other stations. On the other end, the power saving mechanism of 802.11 is ineffective in TCP-based communications, in which the wireless network interface (WNI) has to stay awake to quickly acknowledge senders, and hence, the energy is wasted on channel listening during idle awake time. In this paper, considering the needs of both ends, we utilize the idle communication power of the WNI to provide a Cooperative Relay Service (CRS) for WLANs with multiple channel rates. We characterize energy efficiency as energy per bit, instead of energy per second. In CRS, a high channel rate station relays data frames as a proxy between its neighboring stations with low channel rates and the Access Point, improving their throughput and energy efficiency. Different from traditional relaying approaches, CRS compensates a proxy for the energy consumed in data forwarding. The proxy obtains additional channel access time from its clients, leading to the increase of its own throughput without compromising its energy efficiency. Extensive experiments are conducted through a prototype implementation and ns-2 simulations to evaluate our proposed CRS. The experimental results show that CRS achieves significant performance improvements for both low and high channel rate stations

[1]  Xiaoning Ding,et al.  Exploiting Idle Communication Power to Improve Wireless Network Performance and Energy Efficiency , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[2]  Calvin Newport,et al.  The mistaken axioms of wireless-network research , 2003 .

[3]  Paul Barford,et al.  Generating representative Web workloads for network and server performance evaluation , 1998, SIGMETRICS '98/PERFORMANCE '98.

[4]  John V. Guttag,et al.  Time-based Fairness Improves Performance in Multi-Rate WLANs , 2004, USENIX Annual Technical Conference, General Track.

[5]  Martin Heusse,et al.  Performance anomaly of 802.11b , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[6]  A. M. Abdullah,et al.  Wireless lan medium access control (mac) and physical layer (phy) specifications , 1997 .

[7]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .

[8]  Haiyun Luo,et al.  UCAN: a unified cellular and ad-hoc network architecture , 2003, MobiCom '03.

[9]  Raghupathy Sivakumar,et al.  On using the ad-hoc network model in cellular packet data networks , 2002, MobiHoc '02.

[10]  Jason Flinn,et al.  Self-Tuning Wireless Network Power Management , 2005, Wirel. Networks.

[11]  Guohong Cao,et al.  rDCF: A Relay-Enabled Medium Access Control Protocol for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[12]  Voon Chin Phua,et al.  Wireless lan medium access control (mac) and physical layer (phy) specifications , 1999 .

[13]  Robin Kravets,et al.  Application‐driven power management for mobile communication , 2000, Wirel. Networks.

[14]  Hari Balakrishnan,et al.  Minimizing Energy for Wireless Web Access with Bounded Slowdown , 2005, Wirel. Networks.

[15]  Kevin C. Almeroth,et al.  Understanding congestion in IEEE 802.11b wireless networks , 2005, IMC '05.

[16]  Seungjoon Lee,et al.  The case for a multi-hop wireless local area network , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[17]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  Measuring and Reducing Energy Consumption of Network Interfaces in Hand-Held Devices (Special Issue on Mobile Computing) , 1997 .